Skip to main content

The Rich Are Different ! Pareto Law from Asymmetric Interactions in Asset Exchange Models

  • Chapter
Econophysics of Wealth Distributions

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

It is known that asset exchange models with symmetric interaction between agents show either a Gibbs/log-normal distribution of assets among the agents or condensation of the entire wealth in the hands of a single agent, depending upon the rules of exchange. Here we explore the effects of introducing asymmetry in the interaction between agents with different amounts of wealth (i.e., the rich behave differently from the poor). This can be implemented in several ways: e.g., (1) in the net amount of wealth that is transferred from one agent to another during an exchange interaction, or (2) the probability of gaining vs. losing a net amount of wealth from an exchange interaction. We propose that, in general, the introduction of asymmetry leads to Pareto-like power law distribution of wealth.

Fitzgerald: The rich are different from you and me Hemingway: Yes, they have more money

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Persky J (1992) Pareto’s Law, J. Economic Perspectives 6: 181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pareto V (1897) Cours d’Economique Politique, vol 2. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujiwara Y, Souma W, Aoyama H, Kaizoji T, Aoki M (2003) Growth and fluctuations of personal income, Physica A 321: 598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Souma W (2001) Universal structure of the personal income distribution, Fractals 9: 463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Drăgulescu A, Yakovenko V M (2000) Exponential and power-law probability distributions of wealth and income in the United Kingdom and the United States, Physica A 299: 213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sinha S (2005) Evidence for power-law tail of the wealth distribution in India, cond-mat/0502166

    Google Scholar 

  7. http://www.business-standard.com/

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shirras G F (1935) The Pareto Law and the distribution of income, Econ. J. 45: 663–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ispolatov S, Krapivsky P L, Redner S (1998) Wealth distributions in asset exchange models, Eur. Phys. J. B 2: 267–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chakraborti A, Chakrabarti B K (2000) Statistical mechanics of money: How saving propensity affects its distribution, Eur. Phys. J. B 17: 167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drăgulescu A, Yakovenko V M (2000) Statistical mechanics of money, Eur. Phys. J. B 17: 723–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sinha S (2003) Stochastic maps, wealth distribution in random asset exchange models and the marginal utility of relative wealth, Physica Scripta T 106: 59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatterjee A, Chakrabarti B K, Manna S S (2004) Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity, Physica A 335: 155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dynan K E, Skinner J, Zeldes S P (2004) Do the rich save more ?, J. Pol. Econ. 112: 397–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Samuelson P A, Nordhaus W D (2001) Economics (17th Edition). McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ding N, Wang Y, Xu J, Xi N (2003) Power-law distributions in circulating money: Effect of preferential behavior, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 18: 2725–2729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iglesias J R, Goncalves S, Abramson G, Vega J L (2004) Correlation between risk aversion and wealth distribution, Physica A 342: 186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. DiMatteo T, Aste T, Hyde S T (2004) Exchanges in complex networks: income and wealth distributions. In: Mallamace F, Stanley H E (eds) The Physics of Complex Systems (New Advances and Perspectives). IOS Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bhattacharya K, Mukherjee G, Manna S S (2005) Continuously tunable Pareto exponent in a random shuffling money exchange model, this Proceedings volume

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sinha, S. (2005). The Rich Are Different ! Pareto Law from Asymmetric Interactions in Asset Exchange Models. In: Chatterjee, A., Yarlagadda, S., Chakrabarti, B.K. (eds) Econophysics of Wealth Distributions. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0389-X_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics