Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto pp 253–268Cite as

Quando non usare il cemento

  • Chapter

  • 477 Accesses

Estratto

Risale alla fine degli anni’ 70,primi anni’ 80 l’introduzione degli impianti protesici non cementati, prima di anca, in seguito di ginocchio. I risultati ottenuti non furono però entusiasmanti: il disegno non ideale della protesi, l’usura del polietilene con conseguente osteolisi periprotesica e importanti quadri di metallosi furono di volta in volta indicati come la causa del fallimento dell’impianto [1–4]. Tali inconvenienti hanno,almeno nelle fasi iniziali, influito negativamente sulla ricerca e sullo sviluppo di protesi non cementate insieme all’evoluzione migliorativa dei disegni protesici cementati, all’affinamento delle modalità di cementazione, alla pubblicazione in letteratura di lavori di revisione clinica a più di 10 anni di pazienti operati con impianti cementati i cui risultati venivano classificati eccellenti e/o comunque buoni [3, 5–7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Cuckler JM, Lemons J, Tamarapalli JR (2003) Polyethylene damage on the non articular surface of modular total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop 410:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nomble PC, Conditt MA, Thompson MT (2003) Extra-articular abrasive wear on cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 416:120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reilly MA, Walker PS (1982) Effects of tibial component on load transfer in upper tibia. Clin Orthop 165:273–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wasielewski RC, Park N, Williams I (2001) Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop 388:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gill GS, Joshi HB, Mills DM (1999) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16-to 21-year results. Clin Orthop (367):210–215

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gill GS, Joshi HB (2001) Long result of kinematic condylar knee replacement: an analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:355–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Laskin RS (2001) The genesis total knee prosthesis: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop (388):95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Callaghan JJ, Squire MW, Goetz DD et al (2000) Cemented rotating-platform total knee replacement. A nine to twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82:705–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hofman AA, Evanich JD, Ferguson RP (2001) Ten to 14 year clinical follow-up of the cementless natural knee system. Clin Orthop (388):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Berend ME, Mending JB (2001) Long term follow-up of anatomic graduated components posterior cruciate retaining total knee replacement. Clin Orthop (388):51–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Whiteside LA (2001) Long-term follow-up of the bone-ingrowth Ortholoc knee system without a metal-backed patella. Clin Orthop (388):77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walker PS, Greene D, Reilly DT (1981) Fixation of tibial component of knee prothesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:258–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuiko R, Zembisch A, Loyoddin M (2003) Osteointegration and implant position after cementless total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 408:201–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Onsten I, Nordqvist A, Calsson AS, Besjakov J (1998) Hydroxyapatite augmentation of the porous coating improves fixation of tibial components. A randomized RSA study in 116 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:417–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Forster MC (2003) Survival analysis of primary cemented total knee arthroplasty: which design last? J Arthroplasty 18:265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chockalingam S, Scott G (2000) The outcome of cemented vs. cementless fixation of a femoral component in total knee replacement (TKR) with identification of radiological sign for prediction of failure. Knee 7:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA (1998) Cemented versus cementless fixation knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (356):66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Morris RW, Gregg PJ (2002) A randomised, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement. Ten-year survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:658–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bert J, McShane M (1988) It is necessary to cement the tibial stem in knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop (356):73–78

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ritter M, Herbst S, Keating M (1994) Radiolucency at the bone cement interface in total knee replacement. The effect of bone surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Berman A, Parmet J, Harding S (1998) Emboli observed with use of transoesophageal echocardiomiography immediately after tourniquet release during total knee arthroplasty with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:389–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seki T, Omori G, Koga Y et al (1999) Is bone density in the distal femur affected by use of cement and by femoral component design in total knee arthroplasty? J Orthop Sci 4:180–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1988) Uncemented total knee arthroplasty: a two to eight years survey and analysis of multi-center, multi-system result. Am J Knee Surgery 1:42

    Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe H, Akizuki S, Takizawa T (2004) Survival analysis of a cementless, cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clinical and radiographic assessment 10 to 13 years after surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:824–829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sansone V, da Gama Malcher M (2004) Mobile-bearing total knee prosthesis: a 5-to 9-year follow-up of the first 110 consecutive arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19:678–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bassett RW (1998) Result of 1000 Performance knees; cementless versus cemented fixation. J Arthroplasty 13:409–413

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sumner DR, Berzins A, Turner TM, Igloria R (1994) Requirements for successful total knee replacements. Design considerations. J Biomech 27:929–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker PS (1989) Requirements for successful total knee replacements. Design considerations. Orthop Clin North Am 20:15–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Stern SH, Wills RD, Gilbert JL (1997) The effect of tibial stem design on component micromotion in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (345):44–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Voltz R, Nisbet J, Lee W (1995) The mechanical stability of various noncemented tibial components. Clin Orthop 226:38–42

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sumner DR, Berzins A, Turner TM, Igloria R (1994) Initial in vitro stability of the tibial component in a canine model of cementless total knee replacement. J Biomech 27:929–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Sato M, Slamovich EB, Webster TJ (2004) Enhanced osteoblast adhesion on hydrothermally-treated hydroxyapatite/titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) sol-gel titanium coatings. Biomaterials 26:1349–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bellemans J (1999) Osteointegration in porous coated knee arthroplasty. The influence of component coating type in sheep. Acta Orthop Scand 288[Suppl]:1–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Soballe K, Hansen E (1990) Hydroxyapatite coating enhances fixation of porous coated implants. A comparison in dogs between press-fit and non interference fit. Acta Orthop Scand 61:299–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Xie J, Baumann MJ, McCabe LR (2004) Osteoblasts respond to hydroxyapatite surfaces with immediate changes in gene expression. J Biomed Mater Res 71:108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rand JA (1991) Cement or cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop (273):52–62

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Li MG, Nilsson KG (2000) The effect of the preoperative bone quality on the fixation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:744–753

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Petersen MM, Nielsen PT, Lebech A (1999) Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:77–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Cho P, Schneider GB, Krizan K, Keller JC (2004) Examination of the bone-implant interface in experimentally induced osteoporotic bone. Implant Dent 13:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sugita T, Umehara J, Sato K (1999) Influence of tibial bone quality on loosening of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis: long-term results. Orthopedics 22:213–215268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Struttura Complessa, Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Italy

    F. P. Di Carlo, S. Franzese & V. Di Carlo

  2. Struttura Complessa, Radiologia II, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia

    M. P. Germano

Authors
  1. F. P. Di Carlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Franzese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Di Carlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. P. Germano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Di Carlo, F.P., Franzese, S., Di Carlo, V., Germano, M.P. (2005). Quando non usare il cemento. In: La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0315-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0379-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation