Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protesi di ginocchio a stabilizzazione posteriore e a conservazione del legamento crociato posteriore. Esame comparativo

  • Chapter
La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto

  • 509 Accesses

Estratto

L’artroprotesi totale di ginocchio si è oramai dimostrata un presidio efficace nel ridurre l’entità del dolore ed incrementare le capacità funzionali. Dati ottenuti da studi eseguiti sia su artroprotesi postero-stabilizzate (PS) che su quelle a conservazione del crociato posteriore (PCR) hanno messo in evidenza risultati rilevanti anche a lungo termine. Ancora oggi esiste, tuttavia, notevole controversia su quale sia il disegno migliore. Gli Autori che sostengono l’uno o l’altro adducono numerosi vantaggi: diversi studi hanno paragonato questi due tipi di artroprotesi, ma spesso la incompleta confrontabilità dei risultati tra i diversi progetti di ricerca per architettura e metodo, nonché la carenza di studi prospettici randomizzati, hanno reso difficile estrapolare conclusioni dai valori riportati [1]. È oramai evidente, ad ogni modo, come l’accuratezza dei tagli ossei, il recupero di un corretto asse di carico ed un preciso bilanciamento dei tessuti molli siano indispensabili per ottenere un risultato eccellente in un’artroprotesi di ginocchio [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Maruyama S, Shinichi Y, Matsui N et al (2004) Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S (2002) Posterior stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:813–818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cerulli G, Ceccarini A, Alberti PF et al (1988) Mechanoreceptors of some anatomical structures of the human knee. In: Müller WE, Hackenbruch W (eds) Surgery and arthroscopy of the knee. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 50–54

    Google Scholar 

  4. Whiteside L (2003) Ligament balancing in total knee replacement. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laskin RS (2000) Il legamento crociato posteriore nell’artroprotesi di ginocchio. In: Sculco TP, Martucci EA (eds) L’artroprotesi di ginocchio. Timeo, Bologna, pp 121–129

    Google Scholar 

  6. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1998) The influence of total knee replacement design on walking and stair climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1328–1334

    Google Scholar 

  7. Becker MW, Insall JN, Faris PM (1991) Bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 271:122–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch HS, Lotke PA, Morrison LD (1994) The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Clin Orthop 309:64–68

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ip D, Ko PS, Lee OB et al (2004) Natural history and pathogenesis of the patella clunk syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:597–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Scott RD, Volatile TB (1986) 12 years experience with posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:100–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shoji H, Shimozaki E (1996) Patellar clunk syndrome in total knee arthroplasty without patella resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 11:198–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Laskin RS, O’Flynn H (1997) Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop 345:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tang WM, Chiu KY, Ng TP, Yau WP (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament-substituting total knee arthroplasty in young rheumatoid patients with advanced knee involvement. J Arthroplasty 19:49–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Archibeck MJ, Berger RA, Barden RM et al (2001) Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1231–1236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gills GS, Joshi AB (2001) Long-term results of retention of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surgery Br 83:510–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelissen RG, Hogendoorn PC (2001) Retain or sacrifice the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty? A histopatological study of the cruciate ligament in osteoarthritic and rheumatoid disease. J Clin Pathol 54:381–384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ritter MA, Faris GW, Faris PM, Davis KE (2004) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with angular varus or valgus deformities of ≥ 20 degrees. J Arthroplasty 19:862–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walther M, König A, Kirschner S, Gohlke F (2000) Results of posterior cruciate-retaining unconstrained total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis: a prospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:166–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Coventry MB (1979) Upper tibial osteotomy for gonarthrosis. The evolution of the operation in the last 18 years and long term results. Orthop Clin North Am 10:191–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Insall JN, Joseph DM, Msika C (1984) High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. A long term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1040–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katz MM, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW (1987) Results of total knee arthroplasty after failed proximal tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:225–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Windsor RE, Insall JN, Vince KG (1988) Technical considerations of total knee arthroplasty after proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:547–555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gill T, Schemitsch EH, Brick GW, Thornhill TS (1995) Revision total knee arthroplasty after failed unicompartimental knee arthroplasty or high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop 321:47–57

    Google Scholar 

  24. Larson KR, Cracchiolo A 3rd, Dorey FJ, Finerman GA (1991) Total knee arthroplasty in patients after patellectomy. Clin Orthop 264:243–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kang JD, Papas SN, Rubash HE, McClain EJ Jr (1993) Total knee arthroplasty in patellectomized patients. J Arthroplasty 8:489–501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Komistek RD, Dennis DA (2001) Fluoroscopic analysis of total knee replacement. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the knee. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 1695–1704

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR (2003) In vivo fluoroscopic analysis of fixed-bearing total knee replacements. Clin Orthop 410:114–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kleinbart FA, Bryk E, Evangelista J et al (1995) Histologic comparison of posterior cruciate ligament from arthritic and age-matched knee specimens. J Arthroplasty 11:726–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Franchi A, Zaccherotti G, Aglietti P (1995) Neural system of the human posterior cruciate ligament in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 10:679–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lattanzio PJ, Chess DG, MacDermid JC (1998) Effect of the posterior ligament in knee-joint proprioception in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:580–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O (1988) Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight-to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop 226:6–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mont MA, Fairbank AC, Yammamoto V et al (1995) Radiographic characterization of aseptically loosened cementless total knee replacement. Clin Orthop 321:73–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Università degli Studi ed Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia

    G. Cerulli, A. Caraffa, P. Antinolfi & G. Zamarra

Authors
  1. G. Cerulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Caraffa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Antinolfi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. G. Zamarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milano

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cerulli, G., Caraffa, A., Antinolfi, P., Zamarra, G. (2005). Protesi di ginocchio a stabilizzazione posteriore e a conservazione del legamento crociato posteriore. Esame comparativo. In: La protesi di ginocchio di primo impianto. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0379-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0315-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0379-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation