Skip to main content

Contrast Medium Administration and Scan Timing for MDCT

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate, pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 206:455–464

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al (1993) Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiology 187:327–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM (1994) Hepatic CT enhancement. Part I. Alterations in the volume of contrast material within the same patients. Radiology 193:513–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bae KT (2003) Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MR angiography: when does it occur and why? Pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 227:809–816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Han JK, Kim AY, Lee KY et al (2000) Factors influencing vascular and hepatic enhancement at CT: experimental study on injection protocol using a canine model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:400–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 207:657–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Hoe L, Marchal G, Baert AL et al (1995) Determination of scan delay-time in spiral CT-angiography: utility of a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:216–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hittmair K, Fleischmann D (2001) Accuracy of predicting and controlling time-dependent aortic enhancement from a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:287–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Silverman PM, Roberts, S, Tefft MC et al (1995) Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 165:73–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleischmann D (2002) Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol 12[Suppl 2]:S11–16

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fleischmann D (2003) Use of high-concentration contrast media in multi-detector row CT: principles and rationale. Eur Radiol 13[Suppl 5]:M14–M20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Berland LL, Lee JY (1988) Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Invest Radiol 23:918–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dean PB, Violante MR, Mahoney JA (1980) Hepatic CT contrast enhancement: effect of dose, duration of infusion and time elapsed following infusion. Invest Radiol 15:158–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 195:353–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Claussen CD, Banzer D, Pfretzschner C et al (1984) Bolus geometry and dynamics after intravenous contrast medium injection. Radiology 153:365–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM (1994) Hepatic CT enhancement. II. Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. Radiology 193:518–522

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Harmon BH, Berland LL, Lee JY (1992) Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT: correlation with indocyanine green transit time. Radiology 184:379–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia P, Genin G, Bret PM et al (1999) Hepatic CT enhancement: effects of the rate and volume of contrast medium injection in an animal model. Abdom Imaging 24:597–603

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T et al (2004) Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high-and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:157–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S et al (1998) Effect of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:429–432

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL et al (1999) Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 210:97–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S et al (1999) Pancreatic CT imaging: effects of different injection rates and doses of contrast material. Radiology 212:219–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multidetector-row helical CT. Radiology 224:757–763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S (1983) Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen: effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest Radiol 18:364–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hopper KD, Mosher TJ, Kasales CJ et al (1997) Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector. Radiology 205:269–271

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haage P, Schmitz-Rode T, Hübner D et al (2000) Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1049–1053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dorio PJ, Lee FT, Henseler KP et al (2003) Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:929–934

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bae KT, Heiken JP (2000) Computer modeling approach to contrast medium administration and scan timing for multislice CT. In: Marincek B, Ros PR, Reiser M, Baker ME (eds) Multislice CT: a practical guide. Springer pp 28–36

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bae KT (2003) Technical aspects of contrast delivery in advanced CT. Appl Radiol 32[Suppl]:12–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heiken, J.P., Bae, K.T. (2005). Contrast Medium Administration and Scan Timing for MDCT. In: Marchal, G., Vogl, T.J., Heiken, J.P., Rubin, G.D. (eds) Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0363-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/88-470-0363-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0305-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0363-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics