Advertisement

Vessels of the neck

  • Mirco Cosottini
  • Maria Chiara Michelassi
  • Guido Lazzarotti

Keywords

Digital Subtraction Angiography Carotid Stenosis Conventional Angiography Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Digital Angiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C, et al (2002) High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective ray angiography. Stroke 33:1522–1529CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wetzel S, Bongartz GM (2000) Carotid and vertebral arteries in magnetic resonance angiography. Springer Verlag Berlin, pp 217–234Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Standards of practice committee of the society of cardiovascular and interventional radiology (1990) Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Radiology 177:619–626Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC (1993) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:877–881PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cosottini M, Zampa V, Petruzzi P et al (2000) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in the assessment of subclavian artery diseases. Eur Radiol 10:1737–1744CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators (1991) Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 325:445–453Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425 for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial CollaboratorsPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sameshima T, Futami S, Morita Y et al (1999) Clinical usefulness of and problems with three-dimensional CT angiography for the evaluation of arteriosclerotic stenosis of the carotid artery: comparison with conventional angiography, MRA, and ultrasound sonography. Surg Neurol 51:301–309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Steinke W, Kloetzsch C, Hennerici M (1990) Carotid artery disease assessed by Color Doppler flow imaging: correlation with standard Doppler sonography and angiography. AJR 154:1061–1068PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel MR, Kuntz KM, Klufas RA et al (1995) Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? Stroke 26:1753–1758PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the non invasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke 34:660–664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leclerc X, Martinat P, Godefroy O et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results. AJNR 19:1405–1413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, Chenevert TL (1996) The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 6:642–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scheffler K, Boos M, Steinbrich W, Bongartz G (1998) Flow sensitivity of contrast enhanced MRA. MAGMA 6(suppl 1):178Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cosottini M, Calabrese R, Puglioli M et al (2003) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) MR-angiography (CEMRA) of neck vessels: does dephasing effect alter diagnostic accuracy? Eur Radiol 13:571–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fellner FA, Wutke R, Lang W (2001) Imaging of internal carotid arterial stenosis: is the new standard non invasive? Radiology 219:858–859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnston DC, Goldstein LB (2001) Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology; 56:1009–1015PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG et al (1995) Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the ad hoc. Committee, American Heart Association. Stroke 26:188–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnston DC, Eastwood JD, Nguyen T, Goldstein LB (2002) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 33:2834–2838PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norris JW, Rothwell PM (2001) Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy: is it really safer than conventional angiography? Neurology 56:990–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G (1998) Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first pass, gadolinium enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography. Preliminary study. Radiology 209:95–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi CJ, Kramer CM (2002) MR imaging of atherosclerotic plaque. Radiol Clin North Am 40:887–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guillon B, Levy C, Bousser MG (1998) Internal carotid artery dissection: an update. J Neurol Sci 153:146–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Levy C, Laissy JP, Raveau V et al (1994) Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography and MR imaging versus conventional angiography. Radiology 190:97–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Phillips CD, Bubash LA (2002) CT angiography and MR angiography in the evaluation of extracranial carotid vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 40:783–798CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Phan T, Huston J 3rd, Bernstein MA, Riederer SJ, Brown RD Jr (2001) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical vessels: experience with 422 patients. Stroke 32:2282–2286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mascalchi M, Cosottini M, Ferrito G et al (1999) Contrast-enhanced time-resolved MR angiography of spinal vascular malformations. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:341–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mirco Cosottini
    • 1
  • Maria Chiara Michelassi
    • 2
  • Guido Lazzarotti
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of NeuroscienceUniversity of Pisa and Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology University, AOUPPisaItaly
  2. 2.Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity, AOUPPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations