Peripheral arterial system

  • Virna Zampa
  • Irene Bargellini


Magnetic Resonance Angiography Digital Subtraction Angiography Magn Reson Image Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome Magnetic Resonance Angiography Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T et al (2002) Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. Am J Roentgenol 179:1013–1021Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF (2003) 3D contrast MR angiography, 3rd ed. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 185–215Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goyen M, Ruehm SG, Barkhausen J et al (2001) Improved multi-station peripheral MR angiography with a dedicated vascular coil. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:475–480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goyen M, Quick HH, Debatin JF et al (2002) Whole-body three-dimensional MR angiography with a rolling table platform: initial clinical experience. Radiology 224:270–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engelbrecht MR, Saeed M, Wendland MF et al (1998) Contrast-enhanced 3D-TOF MRA of peripheral vessels: intravascular versus extracellular MR contrast media. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:616–621PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steffens JC, Link J, Muller-Hulsbeck S et al (1997) Cardiac-gated 2D phase-contrast MRA of lower extremity occlusive disease. AJR 169:749–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sharafuddin MJ, Stolpen AH, Sun S et al (2002) High-resolution multiphase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR compared with two-dimensional TOF MR angiography for the identification of pedal vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:695–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinn SF, Sheley RC, Szumowski J, Shimakawa A (1997) Evaluation of the iliac arteries: comparison of two-dimensional TOF MRA with cardiac compensated fast gradient recalled echo and contrast-enhanced three-dimensional TOF MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:197–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Barkhausen J et al (2001) Rapid magnetic resonance angiography for detection of atherosclerosis. Lancet 357:1086–1091CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huber A, Heuck A, Baur A et al (2000) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography from the distal aorta to the ankle joint with a step-by-step technique. Am J Roentgenol 175:1291–1298Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li W, Zhang M, Sher S, Edelman RR (2000) MR angiography of the vascular tree from the aorta to the foot: combining two-dimensional TOF and three-dimensional contrast-enhanced imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:884–889PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prince MR, Chabra SG, Watts R et al (2002) Contrast material travel times in patients undergoing peripheral MR angiography. Radiology 224:55–61PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Swan JS et al (2001) The effect of injection rate on time-resolved contrast-enhanced peripheral MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:401–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee HM, Wang Y (1998) Dynamic K-space filling for bolus chase 3D MR digital subtraction angiography. Magn Reson Med 40:99–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Swan JS, Carroll TJ, Kennell TW et al (2002) Time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the peripheral vessels. Radiology 225:43–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A et al (2000) Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Am J Roentgenol 174:171–179Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Klein WM, Schlejen PM, Eikelboom BC et al (2003) MR angiography of the lower extremities with a moving-bed infusion-tracking technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:1–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Winterer JT, Schaefer O, Uhrmeister P et al (2002) Contrast enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of relevant stenoses in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: diagnostic value of a two-step examination protocol in comparison to conventional DSA. Eur J Radiol 41:153–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dorenbeck U, Seitz J, Volk M et al (2002) Evaluation of arterial bypass grafts of the pelvic and lower extremities with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Invest Radiol 37:60–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Atilla S, Ilgit ET, Akpek S, Yucel C et al (1998) MR imaging and MR angiography in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome. Eur Radiol 8:1025–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Link J, Steffens JC, Brossmann J et al (1999) Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. Radiology 212:371–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goyen M, Reuhm S, Debatin J (2002) MR angiography for assessment of peripheral vascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 40:835–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hood MN, Ho VB, Foo TK et al (2002) High-resolution gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the infrapopliteal arteries. Lessons for improving bolus-chase peripheral MRA. Magn Reson Imaging 20:543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Carroll TJ, Grist TM (2002) Technical developments in MR angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 40:921–951CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saeed M, Wendland MF, Higgins CB (2000) Blood pool MR contrast agents for cardiovascular imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:890–898CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Omary RA, Green J, Finn JP, Li D (2002) Catheter-directed gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiol Clin North Am 40:953–963CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Virna Zampa
    • 1
  • Irene Bargellini
    • 1
  1. 1.Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity, AOUPPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations