Advertisement

FSW of Lap and T-Joints

  • L. FratiniEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advanced Structured Materials book series (STRUCTMAT, volume 8)

Abstract

Even if in the last years several researches have studied the Friction Stir Welding (FSW) process, it should be observed that most of these studies are concerned with the butt joint and just a few of them extend to more complex geometries. It is worthy to notice that the acquired knowledge on FSW process of butt joints is not immediately extendable to lap and T-joints. The first observation is that in butt joints the surface to be welded is vertical, while in lap and T-joints it is horizontal and placed at the bottom of the top blank to be welded; in this way a major vertical component of the material flow is required to obtain sound joints. In the FSW of lap-joints four different geometrical configurations are possible—actually reducible to two—on the basis of the combination of the mutual position of the sheets to be welded and of the tool rotation direction, strongly affecting the process mechanics and the effectiveness of the final part. Furthermore, in the FSW of T-parts a proper clamping fixture is needed in order to fix the stringer during the process; such fixture is characterized by two radii, one for each side of the joints, corresponding to the radii between skin and stringer in the final welded part (corner fillets). Actually during the FSW process such radii must be filled by the flowing material. Consequently, an actual forging operation is required to force the sheet and the stringer material in fulfilling the radii of the clamping fixture, resulting in the radii of the T-joint. In other words, the material flow induced by the tool in the FSW process must be effective enough to get both the bonding of the two blanks and the fulfillment of the fixture radii. On the basis of the above observations, once the material of the blanks to be welded is selected, the most effective set of operating and geometrical parameters that optimize the FSW of butt joints will not, in all probability, work for the lap or T-joints. In particular, the tool geometries together with the tool feed rate and rotating speed must be redetermined in order to get an effective material flow and bonding conditions during the FSW process since the plastomechanics of the two processes are completely different. The specific peculiarities of the two processes must be properly investigated and the correlations between the characteristics of the materials to be welded and the mechanics of the welding configurations must be highlighted.

Keywords

Friction Stir Weld Material Flow Welding Line Friction Stir Spot Welding Butt Joint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wish to express his grateful thanks to Dr. Gianluca Buffa for all his work made in experiments and numerical simulations, to Prof. Rajiv Shivpuri for his help and ideas and finally to Prof. Fabrizio Micari for his constant encouragement and supervising action.

References

  1. 1.
    Thomas, W.M., Nicholas, E.D., Needham, J.C., Murch, M.G., Temple-Smith, P., Dawes, C.J.: Friction Stir Butt Welding (1991). International Patent Application No. PCT/GB92/02203Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mishra, R.S., Ma, Z.Y.: Friction stir welding and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 50, 1–78 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nandan, R., DebRoy, T., Bhadeshia, H.K.D.H.: Recent advances in friction-stir welding—process, weldment structure and properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 980–1023 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas, W.M., Johnson, K.I., Wiesner, C.S.: Friction stir welding-recent developments in tool and process technologies. Adv. Eng. Mater. 5(7), 485–490 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Colegrove, P.A., Shercliff, H.R., Hyoe, T.: Development of the Trivex™ friction stir welding tool for making lap welds. In: 5th International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elrefaey, A., Gouda, M., Takahashi, M., Ikeuchi, K.: Characterization of aluminum/steel lap joint by friction stir welding. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 14(1), 10–17 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elrefaey, A., Takahashi, M., Ikeuchi, K.: Friction-stir-welded lap joint of aluminum to zinc-coated steel. Yosetsu Gakkai Ronbunshu/Q. J. Jpn. Weld. Soc. 23(2), 186–193 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen, Y.C., Komazaki, T., Kim, Y.G., Tsumura, T., Nakata, K.: Interface microstructure study of friction stir lap joint of AC4C cast aluminum alloy and zinc-coated steel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 111(2–3), 375–380 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, Y.C., Nakata, K.: Effect of the surface state of steel on the microstructure and mechanical properties of dissimilar metal lap joints of aluminum and steel by friction stir welding. Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 39(8), 1985–1992 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Abdollah-Zadeh, A., Saeid, T., Sazgari, B.: Microstructural and mechanical properties of friction stir welded aluminum/copper lap joints. J. Alloy. Compd. 460(1–2), 535–538 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saeid, T., Abdollah-zadeh, A., Sazgari, B.: Weldability and mechanical properties of dissimilar aluminum-copper lap joints made by friction stir welding. J. Alloy. Compd. (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.10.127 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, C.-Y., Lee, W.-B., Kim, J.-W., Choi, D.-H., Yeon, Y.-M., Jung, S.-B.: Lap joint properties of FSWed dissimilar formed 5052 Al and 6061 Al alloys with different thickness. J. Mater. Sci. 43(9), 3296–3304 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ericsson, M., Jin, L.-Z., Sandström, R.: Fatigue properties of friction stir overlap welds. Int. J. Fatigue 29, 57–68 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schmidt, H., Hattel, J., Wert, J.: An analytical model for the heat generation in friction stir welding. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12, 143–147 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woo, W., Choo, H., Brown, D.W., Bourke, M.A.M., Feng, Z., David, S.A., Hubbard, C.R., Liaw, P.K.: Deconvoluting the influence of heat and plastic deformation on internal strain generated by friction stir processing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 1–4 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fersini, D., Pirondi, A.: Fatigue behavior of Al2024-T3 friction stir welded lap joints. Eng. Fract. Mech. 74(4), 468–480 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fersini, D., Pirondi, A.: Analysis and modeling of fatigue failure of friction stir welded aluminum alloy single-lap joints. Eng. Fract. Mech. 75, 790–803 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, Y.C., Nakata, K.: Effect of tool geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir lap welded magnesium alloy and steel. Mater. Design 30(9), 3913–3919 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kulekci, M.K., Sik, A., Kaluç, E.: Effects of tool rotation and pin diameter on fatigue properties of friction stir welded lap joints. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 36, 877–882 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fratini, L., Corona, V.: Friction stir welding lap joint resistance optimization through gradient techniques. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 129, 1–6 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Buffa, G., Campanile, G., Fratini, L., Prisco, A.: Friction stir welding of lap joints: influence of process parameters on the metallurgical and mechanical properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 519, 19–26 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tran, V.-X., Pan, J., Pan, T.: Effects of processing time on strengths and failure modes of dissimilar spot friction welds between aluminum 5754-O and 7075-T6 sheets. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209(8), 3724–3739 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pan, T.Y., Joaquin. A., Wilkosz, D.E., Reatherford, L., Nicholson, J.M., Feng, Z., Santella, M.L.: Spot friction welding for aluminum joining. In: Proceedings of 5th International Symposium on Friction Stir Welding, Metz, France (2004), ISBN 1-903761-04-2Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alléhaux, D., Marie, F.: Mechanical and corrosion behavior of the 2139 aluminum-copper alloy welded by the Friction Stir Welding using the bobbin tool technique. Mater. Sci. Forum 519–521(2), 1131–1138 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Buffa, G., Fratini, L., Piacentini, M.: On the influence of tool path in friction stir spot welding of aluminum alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 208, 309–317 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mashiri, F.R., Zhao, X.L., Grundy, P.: Stress concentration factors and fatigue behaviour of welded thin-walled CHS-SHS T-joints in-plane bending. Eng. Struct. 26, 1861–1865 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carpinteri, A., Birghenti, R., Huth, H., Vantadori, S.: Fatigue growth of a surface crack in a welded T-joint. Int. J. Fatigue 27, 59–69 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaikh, H., Khatak, H.S., Mahendran, N., Sethi, V.K.: Failure analysis of a T-joint of AISI type 316L stainless steel. Eng. Fail. Anal. 10, 113–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fratini, L., Buffa, G., Filice, L., Gagliardi, F.: FSW of AA6082-T6 T-joints: process engineering and performance measurement. J. Eng. Manuf. B 220(5), 669–676 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fratini, L., Micari, F., Squillace, A., Giorleo, G. Experimental characterization of FSW T-joints of light alloys. Key Eng. Mater. 344, 751–758 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fratini, L., Buffa, G., Micari, F., Shivpuri. R.: On the material flow in FSW of T-joints: influence of geometrical and technological parameters. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 44, 570–578 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Padovani, C., Fratini, L., Squillace, A., Bellucci, F.: Electrochemical analysis on friction stir welded and laser welded 6XXX aluminium alloys T-joints. Corros. Rev. 25(3–4), 475–489 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fratini, L., Buffa, G., Shivpuri, R.: Influence of material characteristics on plastomechanics of the FSW process for T-joints. Mater. Design 30, 2435–2445 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Acerra, F., Buffa, G., Fratini, L., Troiano, G.: On the FSW of AA2024-T4 and AA7075-T6 T-joints: an industrial case study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2009). doi:  10.1007/s00170-009-2344-9 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fleming, P.A., Hendricks, C.E., Wilkes, D.M., Cook, G.E., Strauss, A.M.: Automatic seam-tracking of friction stir welded T-joints. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. (2009). doi:  10.1007/s00170-009-1990-2 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoon, J.W., Bray, G.H., Valente, R.A.F., Childs, T.E.R.: Buckling analysis for an integrally stiffened panel structure with a friction stir weld. Thin Walled Struct. 47(12), 1608–1622 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shahri, M.M., Sandström, R.: Fatigue analysis of friction stir welded aluminum profile using critical distance. Int. J. Fatigue 32, 302–309 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Song, M., Kovacevic, R.: Thermal modeling of friction stir welding in a moving coordinate system and its validation. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 43, 605–615 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang, Z., Chen, J.T.: The simulation of material behaviors in friction stir welding process by using rate-dependent constitutive model. J. Mater. Sci. 43(1), 222–232 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lorrain, O., Serri, J., Favier, V., Zahrouni, H., Hadrouz, M.: A contribution to a critical review of friction stir welding numerical simulation. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 4(2), 351–369 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Assidi, M., Fourment, L., Guerdoux, S., Nelson, T.: Friction model for friction stir welding process simulation: Calibrations from welding experiments. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 50(2), 143–155 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Butan, D., Monaghan, J.: Thermomechanical modelling friction stir welding aluminium 2024-T3. Int. J. Comput. Mater. Sci. Surf. Eng. 2(1–2), 63–72 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Buffa, G., Hua, J., Shivpuri, R., Fratini, L.: A continuum based FEM model for friction stir welding—model development. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 419(1–2), 389–396 (2006)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Buffa, G., Hua, J., Shivpuri, R., Fratini, L.: Design of the friction stir welding tool using the continuum based FEM model. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 419(1–2), 381–388 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fratini, L., Buffa, G., Palmeri, D., Hua, J., Shivpuri, R.: Material flow in FSW of AA7075-T6 butt joints: numerical simulations and experimental verifications. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 11(4), 412–421 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Xu, S., Deng, X.: A study of texture patterns in friction stir welds. Acta Mater. 56, 1326–1341 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hamilton, C., Dymek, S., Blicharski, M.: A model of material flow during friction stir welding. Mater. Charact. 59(9), 1206–1214 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Buffa, G., Fratini, L., Ruisi V.F.: Friction stir welding of tailored joints for industrial applications. In: Proceedings of Esaform 2009 Conference, Lyon, France (2009)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Buffa, G., Fratini, L., Lo Monaco, L.: Improved FE model for the simulation of friction stir welding of different materials. Sci. Technol. Weld. Join. 15(3), 199–207 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria IndustrialeUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations