Abstract
The most long-lived metaphysics or view of reality in the history of Western thought is Aristotle’s teleology , which reigned for almost 2,000 years. Biology was expressed in terms of function or telos , and accorded perfectly with common sense. The rise of mechanistic, Newtonian science vanquished teleological explanations. Understanding and accommodating animal telos was essential to success in animal husbandry, which involved respect for telos, and was presuppositional to our “ancient contract” with domestic animals. Telos was further abandoned with the rise of industrial agriculture, which utilized “technological fixes” to force animal into environments they were unsuited for, while continuing to be productive. Loss of husbandry and respect for telos created major issues for farm animal welfare, and forced the creation of a new ethic demanding respect for telos. As genetic engineering developed, the notion arose of modifying animals to fit their environment in order to avoid animal suffering, rather than fitting them into congenial environments. Most people do not favor changing the animals, rather than changing the conditions under which they are reared. Aesthetic appreciation of husbandry and virtue ethics militate in favor of restoring husbandry, rather than radically changing animal teloi. One, however, does not morally wrong teloi by changing them—one can only wrong individuals. In biomedical research, we do indeed inflict major pain, suffering and disease on animals. And genetic engineering seems to augment our ability to create animals to model diseases, particularly more than 3,000 known human genetic diseases. The disease, known as Lesch–Nyhan’s syndrome or HPRT deficiency, which causes self-mutilation and mental retardation, provides us with a real possibility for genetically creating “animal models” of this disease, animals doomed to a life of great and unalleviable suffering. This of course creates a major moral dilemma. Perhaps one can use the very genetic engineering which creates this dilemma to ablate consciousness in such animal models, thereby escaping a moral impasse.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Gaskell G et al (1997) Europe ambivalent on biotechnology. Nature 387:845ff
Karson EM (1991) Principles of gene transfer and the treatment of disease. In: First N, Haseltine FP (eds) Transgenic animals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston
Kelley WN, Wyngaarden JB (1983) Clinical syndromes associated with hypoxanthine-guanine phosphororibosyltransferase deficiency. In: Stanbury JB et al (eds) The metabolic basis of inherited disease, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York. Chapter 51
Rollin BE (1995) The Frankenstein syndrome. Cambridge University Press, New York
Rollin BE (2006a) Animal rights and human morality, 3rd edn. Prometheus Books, Buffalo
Rollin BE (2006b) Science and ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Rollin, B.E.(2011a) Animal rights as a mainstream phenomenon. Animals 1:102–115
Rollin BE (2011b) Putting the horse before descartes. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
Rollin BE (2013) Telos. In: Wathes C et al (eds) Veterinary and animal ethics. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
Singer P (1975) Animal liberation. New York Review of Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rollin, B.E. (2014). Telos, Conservation of Welfare, and Ethical Issues in Genetic Engineering of Animals. In: Lee, G., Illes, J., Ohl, F. (eds) Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_279
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2014_279
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44865-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44866-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)