Advertisement

Concluding Remarks and Future Perspectives

  • Vera HomemEmail author
  • Nuno RatolaEmail author
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 89)

Abstract

This final chapter intends to convey to the readers the main lessons learned so far, the most important challenges found and an overview of the possible research trends yet to explore in the study of volatile methylsiloxanes (VMSs) in the environment. From all the excellent contributions to this book, besides a comprehensive and thorough display of properties, levels, trends and advances of the current state of the art in several environmental matrices, a number of gaps were detected and discussed and new solutions suggested. Therefore, it is expected that in the near future, the development of new management strategies; new findings regarding the occurrence, behaviour and toxicity of volatile methylsiloxanes; the improvement of risk assessment studies; and the inclusion of chronic exposure assays of mixtures of these substances are the pathways to enhance the expertise of scientists and stakeholders on the science of siloxanes.

Keywords

Environment Future research Knowledge gaps Limitations Volatile methylsiloxanes 

References

  1. 1.
    Global Silicones Council (2016) Socio-economic evaluation of the global silicones industry. Final Report, London. https://sehsc.americanchemistry.com/Socio-Economic-Evaluation-of-the-Global-Silicones-Industry-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed Jan 2018
  2. 2.
    Mojsiewicz-Pieńkowska K, Krenczkowska D (2018) Evolution of consciousness of exposure to siloxanes – review of publications. Chemosphere 191:204–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Homem V, Capela D, Silva JS, Cincinelli A, Santos L, Alves A, Ratola N (2017) An approach to the environmental prioritisation of volatile methylsiloxanes in several matrices. Sci Total Environ 579:506–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanchís J, Cabrerizo A, Galbán-Malagón C, Barceló D, Farré M, Dachs J (2015) Unexpected occurrence of volatile dimethylsiloxanes in antarctic soils, vegetation, phytoplankton, and krill. Environ Sci Technol 49:4415–4424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Warner NA, Evenset A, Christensen G, Gabrielsen GW, Borgå K, Leknes H (2010) Volatile siloxanes in the European arctic: assessment of sources and spatial distribution. Environ Sci Technol 44:7705–7710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chainet F, Lienemann C-P, Courtiade M, Ponthusa J, François O, Donard X (2011) Silicon speciation by hyphenated techniques for environmental, biological and industrial issues: a review. J Anal At Spectrom 26:30–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang D-G, Steer H, Pacepavicius G, Smyth SA, Kinsman L, Alaee M (2013) Seasonal variation and temperature-dependent removal efficiencies of cyclic volatile methylsiloxanes in fifteen wastewater treatment plants. Organohalogen Compd 75:1286–1290Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scarlat N, Dallemand J-F, Fahl F (2018) Biogas: developments and perspectives in Europe. Renew Energy 129(Part A):457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Commission (2018) Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/35 of 10 January 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (‘D4’) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (‘D5’). Off J Eur Union L 6:45–47Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Chemical Agency (ECHA) (2018) Annex XV restriction report – proposal for a restriction – D4, D5 and D6. Finland. https://echa.europa.eu/registry-of-restriction-intentions/-/dislist/details/0b0236e181a55ade. Accessed June 2019
  11. 11.
    CES – Silicones Europe (2018) Media statement: the addition of D4, D5 and D6 to the candidate list under REACH is disproportionate and endangers critical beneficial uses. https://www.silicones.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/The-addition-of-D4-D5-and-D6-to-the-Candidate-list-under-REACH-is-disproportionate-and-endangers-critical-beneficial-uses-1.pdf. Accessed July 2019
  12. 12.
    Oziel C (2019) Echa’s new siloxanes restriction plan faces industry opposition. Chemical Watch – Global Risk & Regulation News. https://chemicalwatch.com/74170/echas-new-siloxanes-restriction-plan-faces-industry-opposition. Accessed July 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEPABE – Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations