Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrological Simulation of a Rainfed Agricultural Watershed Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part I

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 76))

Abstract

The hydrology component of the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) watershed model was evaluated in the El-Dabaa and El-Alamian watershed of Egypt; using the runoff measured at the outlet of the watershed. At present, prediction of stream flow simulation in data-sparse basins of the northwestern coast of Egypt is a challenging task due to the absence of reliable ground-based rainfall information, while satellite-based rainfall estimates are immensely useful to improve our understanding of spatio-temporal variation of rainfall, particularly for data-sparse basins. The main objective of this chapter was to test the performance and feasibility of the SWAT model and the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) for prediction of runoff in the watershed with application to a study area in the Northwestern coastal zone of Egypt.

The SWAT model requires the following data: digital elevation model (DEM), land use, soil, and daily climate data for driving the model, and runoff data for calibrating the model. All these data were collected from local organizations except DEM. All input files for the model were organized and assembled following the guidelines of ArcSWAT interface of the SWAT 2012 version. The study area was delineated into 71 sub-basins and 145 hydrological response units (HRU), which are unique combinations of land use, soil type, and slope.

The model was calibrated for the period 1979–2014 and validated in the period 1971–2000 based on the availability of coinciding climatic data. The weather generator tool of the SWAT was used to fill in the missing climatic data and enabled flow simulation in the periods with missing data. The studied basins have actual runoff (Q) ranges between 0.70 and 72.9 mm annually. The study area has runoff coefficient range between 0.9 and 52% of its rainfall. Hence, the remaining rainfall is lost by infiltration and evaporation processes. Acceptable statistical parameters were obtained after calibration processes as indicated by R2 = 0.91, E = 0.78, and E′ = 0.61 for calibration and R2 = 0.82, E = 0.81, and E′ = 0.61 for validation.

Considering the good results of SWAT in this study and comprehensiveness of the model in land surface processes representation, the model is very promising for runoff, land and water management studies and expected to give valuable information to resources managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pomeroy JW, Spence C, Whitfield PH (2013) Putting prediction in ungauged basins into practice, Putting prediction in ungauged basins into practice. Canadian Water Resources Association, Ottawa, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kapangaziwiri E, Hughes DA, Wagener T (2012) Incorporating uncertainty in hydrological predictions for gauged and ungauged basins in southern Africa. Hydrol Sci J 57(5):1000–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Minihane M (2013) Estimating mean monthly streamflow in the Lugenda River, Northern Mozambique, putting prediction in ungauged basins into practice. Canadian Water Resources Association, Ottawa, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  4. IPCC IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability contribution of working group II to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stone M, Hotchkiss R, Hubbard C, Fontaine T, Mearns L, Arnold J (2001) Impacts of climate change on Missouri River Basin water yield. J Am Water Resour Assoc 37(5):1119–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. USEPA (2004) Global warming site. [Online] http://yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming.nsf/content/index.html

  7. Omran E-SE (2017) Will the traditional agriculture pass into oblivion? Adaptive remote sensing approach in support of precision agriculture. In: Adaptive soil management: from theory to practices. Springer, Singapore, pp 39–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Omran E, Negm A (2018) Adaptive management zones of Egyptian coastal lakes. In: The handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hooper B (2003) Integrated water resources management and river basin governance. Water Resour Updat 126:8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferreyra C, Beard P (2007) Participatory evaluation of collaborative and integrated water management: insights from the field. J Environ Plan Manag 50(2):271–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560601156532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Desert Research Center D (2010) Development of Northwestern coastal wadies. Progressive report DRC publications

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arnold JG, Srinivasan R, Muttiah RS, Williams JR (1998) Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:73–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arnold J, Fohrer N (2005) SWAT2000: current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modeling. Hydrol Process 19(3):563–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gassman PW, Osei E, Saleh A, Rodecap J, Norvell S, Williams J (2006) Alternative practices for sediment and nutrient loss control on livestock farms in northeast Iowa. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117(2–3):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gassman P, Sadeghi A, Srinivasan R (2014) Applications of the SWAT model special section: overview and insights. J Environ Qual 43(1). https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.11.0466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krysanova V, White M (2015) Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT – an overview. Hydrol Sci J 60(5):771–783

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bressiani D, Gassman P, Fernandes J, Garbossa L, Srinivasan R, Bonumá N, Mendiondo E (2015) A review of SWAT (soil and water application tool) applications in Brazil: challenges and prospects. Int J Agric Biol Eng 8:9–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Adeogun AG, Sule BF, Salami AW, Daramola MO (2014) Validation of SWAT model for prediction of water yield and water balance: case study of upstream catchment of Jebba dam in Nigeria. Int J Phys Nucl Sci Eng 8:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abbaspour KC, Yang J, Maximov I, Siber R, Bogner K, Mieleitner J, Zobrist J, Srinivasan R (2007) Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT. J Hydrol 333:413–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tibebe D, Bewket W (2010) Surface runoff and soil erosion estimation using the SWAT model in 5 the Keleta watershed, Ethiopia. Land Degrad Dev 22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbaspour KC, Rouholahnejad E, Vaghefi S, Srinivasan R, Yang H, Kløve B (2015) A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model. J Hydrol 524:733–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiang L, Chaubey I, Gitau MW, Arnold JG (2010) Differentiating impacts of land use changes from pasture management in a CEAP watershed using the SWAT model. Trans ASABE 53:1569–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pai N, Saraswat D (2011) SWAT 2009_LUC: a tool to activate the land use change module in SWAT 2009. Trans ASABE 54(5):1649–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arnold J, Moriasi D, Gassman P, Abbaspour K, White M, Srinivasan R et al (2012) SWAT: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55:1491–1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dile YT, Karlberg L, Daggupati P, Srinivasan R, Wiberg D, Rockström J (2016) Assessing the implications of water harvesting intensification on upstream–downstream ecosystem services: a case study in the Lake Tana basin. Sci Total Environ 542(Part A):22–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang X, Liu Q, Fu G, He Y, Luo X, Zheng Z (2016) Spatiotemporal patterns and source attribution of nitrogen load in a river basin with complex pollution sources. Water Res 94:187–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  28. SWAT (2015) ArcSWAT: ArcGIS-ArcView extension and graphical user input interface for SWAT. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grassland, Soil & Water Research Laboratory, Temple, TX. http://www.swattamuedu/software/arcswat/. Accessed 27 Mar 2015

  29. Olivera F, Valenzuela M, Srinivasan R, Choi J, Cho H, Koka S, Agrawal A (2006) ArcGIS-SWAT: a geodata model and GIS interface for SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(2):295–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb03839.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sayed A (2013) Evaluation of the land resources for agricultural development-case study: El-Hammam canal and its extension, NW coast of Egypt. PhD thesis, Als Dissertation angenommen vom Department für Geowissenschaften der Universität Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shukri NM, Phillip G, Said R (1955) The geology of the mediterranean coast between Rosetta and Bardia, part II: pleistocene sediments: geomorphology and microfacies. Bull Inst Egypte 37:395–444

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hammad MA (1986) Sinai technical report, final report of land master plain project. GARPAD, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  33. El Arabi N, Fekry A (2009) Assessment of groundwater potential in Alexandria Governorate. CEDARE, Cairo 62 p

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zaki MH (2000) Assessment of surface water runoff in Mersa Matruh Area, North Western Coastal Zone, A.R.E. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guindy KHA (1989) Hydrogeology of the coastal zone between El Ameriya and ElHammam. PhD thesis, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 151 p

    Google Scholar 

  36. Atawia MG, Abu Heleika MM, El Horiny MM (2012) Hydrogeochemical and vertical electrical soundings for groundwater investigations, Burg El Arab Area, Northwestern Coast of Egypt. J Afr Earth Sci 80:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Abdel Ghaffar MK (2016) Soil suitability evaluation, monitoring and detecting landcover classes under surface irrigation system in an area of Northwestern Coast, Egypt. Int J Adv Res 4(2):152–166

    Google Scholar 

  38. Atta SA, Sharaky AM, EL Hassanein AS, Khallaf KMA (2007) Salinization of the groundwater in the coastal shallow aquifer, Northwestern Nile Delta, Egypt. ISESCO Sci Technol Vis 3(4):112–123

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yousif M, van Geldern R, Bubenzer O (2016) Hydrogeological investigation of shallow aquifers in an arid data-scarce coastal region (El Daba’a, northwestern Egypt). Hydrogeol J 24:159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-015-1308-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Conoco (1986) Geological map of Egypt, scale 1:500,000 GPC, sheets no. NH35NE. Conoco, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  41. White K, Chaubey I (2005) Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validation for a multisite and multivariable SWAT model. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41:1077–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03786.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jha M, Wolter C, Schilling K, Gassman P (2010) Assessment of total maximum daily load implementation strategies for nitrate impairment of the Raccoon River, Iowa. J Environ Qual 39:1317. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Jia S, Wenbin Z, Aifeng L, Tingting Y (2011) A statistical spatial downscaling algorithm of TRMM precipitation based on NDVI and DEM in the Qaidam Basin of China. Remote Sens Environ 115:3069–3079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huffman G, Bolvin D, Nelkin E, Wolff D (2007) Free access the TRMM multisatellite precipitation analysis (TMPA): quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales. J Hydrometeorol 8(1):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu X, Liu FM, Wang XX, Li XD, Fan YY, Cai SX, Ao TQ (2017) Combining rainfall data from rain gauges and TRMM in hydrological modelling of Laotian data-sparse basins. Appl Water Sci 7(3):1487–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0330-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yong B, Chen B, Gourley JJ, Ren L, Hong Y, Chen X, Wang W, Chen LS (2014) GongIntercomparison of the Version-6 and Version-7 TMPA precipitation products over high and low latitudes basins with independent gauge networks: is the newer version better in both real-time and post-real-time analysis for water resources and hydrologic ext. J Hydrol 508:77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Ochoa A, Pineda L, Crespo P, Willems P (2014) Evaluation of TRMM 3B42 precipitation estimates and WRF retrospective precipitation simulation over the Pacific-Andean region of Ecuador and Peru. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:3179–3193. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-3179-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Rudolf B, Hauschild H, Rueth W, Schneider U (1994) Terrestrial precipitation analysis: operational method and required density of point measurements. In: Global precipitations and climate change. Springer, Berlin, pp 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79268-7_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Rashash A, El-Nahry A (2015) Rain water harvesting using GIS and RS for agriculture development in Northern Western Coast, Egypt. J Geogr Nat Dis 5(141). https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-0587.1000141

  50. Mahmoud S (2014) Investigation of rainfall–runoff modeling for Egypt by using remote sensing and GIS integration. Catena 120:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Griensven A (2005) Sensitivity, auto-calibration, uncertainty and model evaluation in SWAT. UNESCO-IHE, Delft, p 48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

    El-Sayed Ewis Omran

Authors
  1. El-Sayed Ewis Omran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to El-Sayed Ewis Omran .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M. Negm

  2. Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Mohamed Abu-hashim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Omran, ES.E. (2018). Hydrological Simulation of a Rainfed Agricultural Watershed Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In: Negm, A.M., Abu-hashim, M. (eds) Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2018_338

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation