Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soil Toxicology: Potential Approach on the Egyptian Agro-Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part I

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 76))

Abstract

Possibly poisonous components represent a risk to human well-being as they can enter the human body by means of ingestion of the contaminated soil, residue. While most metals are fundamental supplements, some fill in as mechanical and ecological dangers if the homeostatic system that keeps up them inside physiological points of confinement is unequal. Others fill no organic need, while still others can possibly deliver ecological infections. Toxicology is more than art of toxic substances. One could characterize a toxic substance as any specialist that is fit for delivering an injurious reaction in an organic framework or equipped for pulverizing life or genuine harming capacities. Or maybe the toxicologist has a commitment to make the recognizable proof of danger characterized as the likelihood that damage will come about because of a compound under particular conditions and to foundation of breaking points of security characterized as the reasonable assurance that damage will not come about because of utilization of a substance under indicated states of value and way of utilization. Presentation to direct groupings of heavy metals can create an assortment of unmistakable impacts without really executing a living being. Assessment of toxicological impacts depends on perceptions of behavioral impacts, surviving, and tissue collection of metals. Heavy metal concentrations posture serious well-being risks and natural worries all through soil-evolved way of life exchange. By portrayal, the small microflora shown in the polluted soil in examination with the unpolluted soil and by segregating and describing particular microorganisms fit for debasing the contamination. The bacteria including cyanobacteria and actinomycetes are wide spreading in normal and with debase different mixes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lyon TL, Buckman HO (1922) The nature and properties of soils: a textbook of edaphology. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ramann E (1928) The evaluation and classification of soils (trans: Whittles CL). Heffer W and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nikiforoff CC (1959) Reappraisal of the soil. Science 129:186–196

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chesworth W (1975) The residual system of chemical weathering: a model for the chemical breakdown of silicate rocks at the surface of the earth. J Soil Sci 24:69–81

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hugget RJ (1975) Soil landscape system: a model of soil genesis. Geoderma 13:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  6. Daniels RB, Hammer RD (1992) Soil geo-morphology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dmitriev EA (1996) Soils and soil like bodies. Eurasian Soil Sci 29:275–282

    Google Scholar 

  8. Targulian VO, Skolova TA (1996) Soil as a biotic/abiotic natural system: a reactor, memory and regulator of biospheric interactions. Eurasian Soil Sci 29:30–41

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dabrovolskii GV, Nikitin ED, Karpachevskii LO (2001) New approaches to the concept of soil place in the biosphere. Eurasian Soil Sci 34(Suppl 1):S1–S5

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nikitin ED (2001) Soil as a bio-abiotic poly functional system. Eurasian Soil Sci 34:S6–S12

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jonson WM (1963) The pedon and polypedon. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 27:212–215

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dandarich JP, Darmady RG, Follmer LR, Johnson DL (2002) Historical development of soil and weathering profile concepts from Europe to the United States of America. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:335–346

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sommer M, Schlichting E (1997) Archetypes of catenas in respect of matter – a concept for structuring and grouping catenas. Geoderma 76:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/50016-7061(96)00095-x

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brikeland PW (1999) Soil and geomorphology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Targulian VO, Skolov IA (1976) Structural and functional approaches to soil: soil memory and soil moment. Mathematical modeling in ecology (in Russian). Nauka, Moscow, pp 17–34

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simson RW (1959) Outline of a generalized theory of soil genesis. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23:152–156

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crompton E (1960) The significance of the weathering/leaching ratio in the differentiation of major soil groups, with particular reference to some very strongly leached brown earths of the hills of Britain. Transactions 7th international congress of soil science. Madison, WI, pp 406–412

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bockheim JG, Gennadiyev AN (2000) The role of soil forming processes in the definition of Taxa in Soil Taxonomy and the Word Soil Reference Base. Geoderma 95:53–72

    Google Scholar 

  19. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. Agriculture handbook, vol 436, 2nd edn. US Govt Print Office, Washington DC, 869 pp

    Google Scholar 

  20. Crowther EM (1953) The skeptical soil chemist. J Soil Sci 40:107–122

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cline MG (1949) Basic principles of soil classification. Soil Sci 67:87–91

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soil Taxonomy (1999) http://www.ftp://ftp-fc.sc.egov.usda.gov./NSSC/Soil_Taxonomy/tax.pdf. Accessed Jan 2009

  23. Huggett RJ (1997) Environmental change: the evolving ecosphere. Rutledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  24. van-Straalen NM, Løkke H (eds) (1997) Ecological risk assessment of contaminants in soil. Chapman & Hall, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Voris, Arthur PMF, Tolle DA (1982) Evaluation of terrestrial microcosms assessing ecological effects of utility wastes. ERRI Publication, no. EA-2364, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Allen HE (2002) Bioavailability of metals in terrestrial ecosystems: importance of partitioning for bioavailability to invertebrates, microbes, and plants. SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL, 158 p

    Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM (1997) Standard guide for conducting laboratory soil toxicity or bioaccumulation tests with the Lumbricid earthworm Eisenia fetida. E 1676-97. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ecology (1996) Earthworm bioassay protocol for soil toxicity screening. Washington State Department of Ecology Publication no. 96-327

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bouché MB (1988) Earthworm toxicology tests, hazard assessment and biomonitoring: a methodological approach. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 315–320

    Google Scholar 

  30. Macdonald DW (1983) Predation earthworms by terrestrial vertebrates. In: Satchel JE (ed) Earthworm ecology: from darwin to vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY, pp 393–414

    Google Scholar 

  31. [EPA] US Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Ecological effects test guideline OPPTS 850.2450 terrestrial (soil-core) microcosm test. EPA 712-C-96-143, April 1996

    Google Scholar 

  32. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: soil microorganisms: carbon transformation test. No. 218 Paris, France, 21 January 2000

    Google Scholar 

  33. Greene JC, Bartels CL, Warren-Hicks WJ, Parkhurst PR, Linder GL, Peterson SA, Miller WE (1989) Protocols for short term toxicity screening of hazardous waste sites. US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvalis, OR. EPA/60/3-88/029

    Google Scholar 

  34. Edwards CA (1983) Development of a standardized laboratory method for assessing the toxicity of chemical substances to earthworm, report EUR 8714EN, Commission of the European Communities

    Google Scholar 

  35. Greig-Smith PW, Becker H, Edwards PJ, Heimbach F (eds) (1992) Ecotoxicology of earthworms. Intercept

    Google Scholar 

  36. [SETAC] Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (1998) Advances in earthworm ecotoxicology. In: Sheppard SC, Bembridge JD, Bembridge M, Holmstrup M, Posthuma L (eds) SETAC Press, Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  37. Marquenie JM, Simmers JW, and Kay SH (1987) Preliminary assessment of bioaccumulation of metals and organic contaminants at the times beach confined disposal site, Buffalo, NY. Final Report, Miscellaneous Paper EL-87-6, US Dept Army, Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS

    Google Scholar 

  38. Neuhauser EF, Durkin PR, Malecki MR, Anatra M (1985) Comparative toxicity of ten organic chemicals to four earthworm species. Comp Biochem Physiol 83C:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  39. Stafford EA and Edwards CA (1985) Comparison of heavy metal uptake by Eisenia fetida with that of other earthworms. Final Technical Report, Contract no. DAJA 45-84-C-0027, Rothansted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, UK

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stenersen J (1979) Action of pesticides on earthworms, part I: the toxicity of cholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides to earthworms as evaluated by laboratory tests. Pest Sci 10:66–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Strickland TC, Fitzgerald JW (1983) Mineralization of sulfur in sulfoquinone by forest soils. Soil Bio Biochem 15:347–349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beyer WN, Cromartie E, Moment GB (1985) Accumulation of methyl mercury in the earthworm, Eisenia fetida, and its effect on regeneration. Bull Environ Cont Toxicol 35:157–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bouwman H, Reinecke AJ (1987) Effects of carbofuran on the earthworm, Eisenia fetida, using a defined medium. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 38:171–178

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Hartenstein R, Neuhauser EF, Collier J (1980) Accumulation of heavy metals in the earthworm, Eisenia fetida. J Environ Qual 9:23–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Inglesfield C (1984) Toxicity of pyrethroid insecticides cypermethrin and WL85871 to the earthworm, Eisenia fetida savigny. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 33:568–570

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Løkke H, van Gestel CAM (1998) Handbook of soil invertebrate toxicity tests. Wiley, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  47. Boyd WA, Stringer VA, Williams PL (2001) Metal LC50s of a soil nematode compared to published earthworm data. In: Greenburg BM, Hull RN, Roberts MH Jr, Gensemer RW (eds) Environmental toxicology and risk assessment: science, policy, and standardization-implications for environmental decisions, 10th volume ASTM STP1403. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA

    Google Scholar 

  48. Peredney CL, Williams PL (2000) Utility of Caenorhabditis elegans for assessing heavy metal contamination in artificial soil. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 39:113–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. RISW (1976) Soil survey of El-Dakahlia Governorate. Report no. 228

    Google Scholar 

  50. Williams PL, Anderson GL, Johnstone JL, Nunn AD, Tweedle FM, Wedeking P (2000) Caenorhabditis elegans as an alternative animal species. J Toxicol Environ Health A 61(8):641–647

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu H, Dutka BJ (1987) ATP-TOX system: a new rapid sensitive bacterial toxicity screening system based on the determination of ATP. Toxicity Assess 2:149–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nannipieri PS, Grego S, Ceccanti B (1990) Ecological significance of the biological activity in soil. Soil Biochem 6:293–355

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Dobbins DC, Aelion CM, Pfaender F (1992) Subsurface, terrestrial microbial ecology and bio-gradation of organic chemicals: a review. Crit Rev Environ Control 22(1/2):67–136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: soil microorganisms: carbon transformation test. No. 217 Paris, France, 21 January 2000

    Google Scholar 

  55. [ASTM] American Society for Testing and Materials (1998) Standard guide for conducting laboratory soil toxicity or bioaccumulation tests with the lumbricid earthworm Eisenia fetida. Annual Book of Standards E 1676-97. West Conshohocken PA, February 1998

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bollag JM, Myers CJ, Minard RD (1992) Biological and chemical interactions of pesticides with soil organic matter. Sci Total Environ 123/124:205–217

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cortet J, Gomot-De Vauflery A, Poinsot-Balaguer N, Texier GL, Ch CD (1999) The use of soil fauna in monitoring pollutants effects. Eur J Soil Bid 35:115–134

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1984) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests no 207 Paris, France, 21 April 1984

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ramanathan V et al (2001) Aerosols, climate and hydrological cycle. Science 294:219. https://doi.org/10.1126/Science.1064034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Szczepanska J, Twardowska I (2004) Mining waste. In: Solid waste: assessment, monitoring and remediation. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 319–386

    Google Scholar 

  61. Culy MD, Berry EC (1995) Toxicity of soil-applied granular insecticides to earthworm populations in cornfields. Down to Earth 50:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sorour J, Larink O (2001) Toxic effects of Benomyl on the ultrastructure during spermatogenesis of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 50(3):180–188

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bustos-Obregon E, Goicochea RI (2002) Pesticide soil contamination mainly affects earthworm male reproductive parameters. Asian J Androl 4(3):195–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Reinecke SA, Reinecke AJ (1999) Lysosomal response of earthworm coelomocytes induced by long term experimental exposure to heavy metals. Pedobiologia 43(6):585–593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sandoval MC, Veiga M, Hinton J, Klein B (2001) Review of biological indicators for metal mining effluents: a proposed protocol using earthworms. In: Proceedings of the 25th annual British Columbia reclamation symposium, pp 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sanchez-Hernandez JC (2006) Earth-worm biomarkers in ecological risk assessment. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 188:85–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. van-Gestel CAM, van-Dis WA (1988) The influence of soil characteristics on the toxicity of four chemicals to the earthworm Eisenia fetida Andrei (Oligochaeta). Biol Fertil Soils 6(3):262–265

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. van-Gestel CAM, van-Dis WA, van Breemen EM, Sparenburg PM (1989) Development of a standardized reproduction toxicity test with the earthworm species Eisenia fetida Andrei using copper, pentachlorophenol and 2,4-dichloroaniline. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 18(3):305–312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Robidoux PY, Hawari J, Thiboutot S, Ampleman G, Sunahara GI (1999) Acute toxicity of 2,4,6 trinitrotoluene in earthworm (Eisenia Andrei). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 44(3):311–321

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Xiao N, Jing B, Ge F, Lui X (2006) The fate of herbicide acetochlor and its toxicity to Eisenia fetida under laboratory conditions. Chemosphere 62(8):1366–1373

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Helling B, Reinecke SA, Reinecke AJ (2000) Effects of fungicide copper oxychloride on the growth and reproduction of Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 46(1):108–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Yasmin S, D' Souza D (2007) Effects of pesticides on the reproductive output of Eisenia fetida. Bull Environ Contam Toxicity 79(5):529–532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Booth LH, Halloran O (2001) A comparison of biomarker responses in the earth worm Aporrectodea caliginosa to the organo-phosphorus insecticides diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Environ Toxic Chem 20(11):2494–2502

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Zhou S, Duan C, Wang X, Michelle WHG, Yu Z, Fu H (2008) Assessing cypermethrin- contaminated soil with three different earth worm test methods. J Environ Sci 20(11):1381–1385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. De Silva PMC, Pathiratne A, van Gestel CAM (2009) Influence of temperature and soil type on the toxicity of three pesticides to Eisenia andrei. Chemosphere 76(10):1410–1415

    Google Scholar 

  76. Maboeta MS, Reinecke AJ, Reinecke SA (1999) Effects of low levels of lead on growth and reproduction of Asian earthworm Perionyx excavatus (Oligochaeta). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 44(3):236–240

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Addison JA, Holmes SB (1995) Comparison of forest soil microcosm and acute toxicity studies for determining effects of fenitrothion on earthworms. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 30(2):127–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Booth H, Heppelthwaite VJ, Halloran K (2000) Growth development and fecundity of the earthworm Aporrectodea caliginosa after exposure to two organophosphates. New Zeal Plant Protect 53:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  79. Gupta SK, Saxena PN (2003) Carbaryl-induced behavioral and reproductive abnormalities in earthworm Metaphire posthuma: a sensitive model. Altern Lab Anim 31(6):587–593

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Amorim MJB, Rombke J, Soares AMV (2005) Avoidance behaviour of Enchytraeus albidus: effects of Benomyl. Carbendazim, phenmedipham and different soil types. Chemosphere 59(4):501–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Kula H (1995) Comparison of laboratory and field testing for the assessment of pesticide side effects on earth worms. Acta Zoolog Fennica 196:338–341

    Google Scholar 

  82. De Silva PMCS (2009) Pesticide effects on earthworms: a tropical perspective. PhD thesis, Department of Ecological Science, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  83. van-Gestel CAM, Dirven-van Breemen EM, Baerselman R et al (1992) Comparison of subleathal and leathal criteria for nine different chemicals in standardized toxicity tests using the earth worm Eisenia andrei. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 23(2):206–220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Holmstrup M (2000) Field assessment of toxic effects on reproduction in the earthworms. Aporrectodea longa and Aporrectodea rosea. Environ Toxic Chem 19(7):1781–1787

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Heimbach F (1992) Correlation between data from laboratory and field tests for investigating the toxicity of pesticides to earthworms. Soil Biol Biochem 24(12):1749–1753

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Jansch S, Frampton GK, Rombke J, van den Brink PJ, Scott-Fordsmand JJ (2006) Effects of pesticides on soil invertebrates in model ecosystem and field studies: a review and comparison with laboratory toxicity data. Environ Toxic Chem 25(9):2490–2501

    Google Scholar 

  87. Sutherland MT, Stribling JB (1995) Status of biological criteria development and implementation. In: Davis WS, Simon TP (eds) Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision-making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 81–96

    Google Scholar 

  88. Plafkin JL, MT Barbour, KD Porter, SK Gross, RM Hughes (1989) Rapid bio-assessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macro-invertebrates and fish EPA 440/4-89/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

    Google Scholar 

  89. Karr JR, Fausch KD, Angermeier PL, Yant PR, Schlosser IJ (1986) Assessing biological integrity in running waters. A method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication, September 1986

    Google Scholar 

  90. Torstensson L, Pell M, Stenberg B (1998) Need of a strategy for evaluation of arable soil quality AMBIO. Royal Swedish Acad Sci 27(1):4–7

    Google Scholar 

  91. Rusek J (1985) Soil microstructures-contributions on specific soil organisms. Quaest Entomol 21:497–514

    Google Scholar 

  92. Mashali AM (1991) Land degradation and desertification in Africa. In: 2nd African Soil Science Society Conference, Cairo, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ayoub AT (1991) “An assessment of human induced soil degradation in Africa” UN environmental program, Second Soil Science Conference Cairo Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  94. UNEP Staff (1992) World atlas of decertification. E. Arnold, London, p 69

    Google Scholar 

  95. Wim G, El Hadji M (2002) Causes, general extent and physical consequence of land degradation in arid, semi- arid and dry sub humid areas. Forest Conservation and Natural Resources, Forest Dept FAO, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  96. United Nations (1994) Earth summit-convention on desertification. Proceedings of the United Nations. Conference on environment and development (UNCED), Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992. Department of Public Information United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  97. UNEP Staff (1986) Sands of change: Why land becomes desert and what can be done about it. UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  98. UNEP Staff (1991) Global assessment of soil degradation. UNEP UN GLASOG Project

    Google Scholar 

  99. US Environmental (2007) What is a pesticide? EPA.gov. Retrieved 15 September 2007

    Google Scholar 

  100. Randall C et al (eds) National Pesticide Applicator Certification Core Manual (2013) National Association of State Departments of Agriculture Research Foundation, Washington, DC, Ch. 1. Types of pesticides. US Environmental Protection Agency. Retrieved 20 February 2013

    Google Scholar 

  101. FAO (1990) Profile description guidelines, vol 14. Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  102. USEPA (2003) Guidance for developing ecological soil screening levels (Eco-SSLS). Attachment 1-2: assessment of whether to develop ecological soil screening levels for microbes and microbial processes. OSWER Directive 92857-55 US Environ Protect Agency, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  103. Giller KE, Witter E, McGrath P (2009) Heavy metals and soil microbes. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2031–2037

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Smolder E, Oorts K, van Sprang P, Schoeters I, Janssen CR, McGrath SP, McLaughlin MJ (2009) The toxicity of trace metals in soil as affected by soil type and aging after contamination: using calibrated bioavailability models to set ecological soil standards. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:1633–1642

    Google Scholar 

  105. McLaughlin MJ, Smolders E (2001) Background zinc concentrations in soil affect the zinc sensitivity of soil microbial process – a rational for a metallo-region approach to risk assessments. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2639–2643

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Smolders E, Buekers J, Oliver I, Mclaughlin MJ (2004) Soil properties affecting toxicity of zinc to soil microbial properties in laboratory-spiked and field-contaminated soils. Environ Toxicity Chem 23:2633–2640

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Oorts K, Ghesquiere U, Smolders E (2007) Leaching and aging decrease nickel toxicity to soil microbial processes in soils freshly spiked with nickel chloride. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1130–1138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. EC (2003) Technical guidance document on risk assessment. Part II in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances. European Communities. http://ecb.jrc.it/Documents/TECHNICAL-GUIDANCE-DOCUMENT/EDITION-2/TGDPART2-2ND.pdf

  109. Rooney CP, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2006) Soil factors controlling the expression of copper toxicity to plants in a wide range of European soils. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:726–732

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. Li HF, Gray C, Micro C, Zhoa FJ, McGrath SP (2009) Phytotoxicity and bioavailability of cobalt to plants in a range of soils. Chemosphere 75:979–986

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Almas A, Mulder I, Bakken LR (2005) Trace metal exposure of soil bacteria depends on their position in the soil matrix. Environ Sci Technol 39:5927–5932

    Google Scholar 

  112. Chaudri AM, McGrath SP, Gibbs P, Chambers BC, Carlton-Smith C, Bacon I, Cambell C, Aitken A (2008) Population size of indigenous Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar trifolii in long term field experiments with sewage sludge cake, metal-amended liquid sludge or metal salts: effects of zinc, copper and cadmium. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1670–1680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Brookes PC, McGrath SP (1984) Effects of metal toxicity on the size of the soil microbial biomass. J Soil Sci 35:341–346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Barajas-Aceves M (2005) Comparison of different microbial biomass and activity measurement methods in metal-contaminated soils. Bioresour Technol 96:1405–1414

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Chander K, Joergensen RC (2001) Decomposition of C14 glucose in two soils with different amounts of heavy metal contamination. Soil Biol Biochem 33:1811–1816

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Chander K, Klein T, Eberhardt U, Joergensen RG (2002) Decomposition of carbon-14-labelled wheat straw in repeatedly fumigated and non- fumigated soils with different levels of heavy metal contamination. Biol Fertil Soils 35:86–91

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Broos K, Macdonald LM, Warne I, Heemsbergen DA, Branes MB, Bell M, McLaughlin MI (2007) Limitations of soil microbial biomass carbon as an indicator of soil pollution in the field. Soil Biol Biochem 39:2693–2695

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Broos K, Mertens I, Smolders E (2005) Toxicity of heavy metals in soil assessed with various soil microbial and plant growth assays: a comparative study. Environ Toxic Chem 24:634–640

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Paoletti MG, Bressan M (1996) Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of human disturbance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 15(1):21–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Paoletti MG (1999) The role of earthworms for assessment of sustainability and as bioindicators. Agr Ecosyst Environ 74(1–3):137–155

    Google Scholar 

  121. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (1984) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: avian dietary toxicity test. No 205 Paris France 4 April 1984

    Google Scholar 

  122. [OECD] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2000) OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals: soil microorganisms: nitrogen transformation test no 218. Paris, France 21 January 2000

    Google Scholar 

  123. Singh S, Anjum NA, Khan NA, Nazar R (2008) Metal-binding peptides and antioxidant defense system in plants: significance in cadmium tolerance. In: Khan NA, Singh S (eds) Abiotic stress and plant responses. IK International, New Delhi, pp 159–189

    Google Scholar 

  124. Chen HS, Huang QY, Liu LN, Ming WL (2010) Poultry manure compost alleviates the phytotoxicity of soil cadmium: influence of growth of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) Pedosphere 20:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  125. Rattan RK, Datta SP, Chhonkar PK, Suribabu K and Singh AK (2005) Long-term impact of irrigation with waste water effluents on heavy metal content in soils crops and groundwater – a case study. Agr Ecosyst Environ 109: 310–322.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Lal B, Sharma MP, Bhattacharya D, Krishnan S (2004) Assessment of intra-species diversity among strains of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from sites contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Canad J Microb 50(6):405–414

    Google Scholar 

  127. Pathak H, Jain PK, Jaroli DP, Lowry ML (2008) Degradation of phenanthrene and anthracene by Pseudomonas strain, isolated from coastal area. Biorem J 12(2):111–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  128. Shivendra S, Pathak H (2014) Pseudomonas in biodegradation. Int J Pure App Biosci 2(1):213–222

    Google Scholar 

  129. Criste A, Hent T, Giuburunca M, Zahan M, Niste M, Losiffit N, Mitrea M (2016) Characterization of microorganisms isolated from petroleum hydrocarbon polluted soil. Bull UASVM Animal Sci Biotechnol 73(1). Doi: https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-asb:11648

  130. Bain R, Chen D, Liu X, Cui L, Li L, Pan G, Xie D, Zheng J, Zhang X, Zheng J, Chang A (2013) Biochar soil amendment as a solution to prevent Cd-tainted rice from China: results from a cross-site field experiment. Ecol Eng 58:378–383

    Google Scholar 

  131. Moon DH, Park JW, Chang YY, Ok YS, Lee SS, Ahmed M, Koutsospyros A, Park JH, Baek K (2013) Immobilization of lead in contaminated firing range soil using biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:8464–8471

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Laing Y, Cao X, Zhao L, Arellano E (2014) Biochar and phosphate-induced immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soil and water: implication on simultaneous remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4665–4674

    Google Scholar 

  133. Rizwan MS, Imtiaz M, Chhajro MA, Huang G, Fu Q, Zhu J, Aziz O, Hu H (2016) Influence of pyrolytic and non-pyrolytic rice and castor straw on the immobilization of Pb and Cu in contaminated soil. Environ Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1158870

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Hmid A, Alchami Z, Sillen W, De V, Vangronsveld J (2015) Olive mill waste biochar: a promising soil amendment for metal immobilization in contaminated soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:1444–1456

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Kim HS, Kim KR, Kim J, Yoon JH, Yang JE, Ok YS, Owens G, Kim KH (2015) Effect of biochar on heavy metal immobilization and uptake by lettuce (Lactuca sativa L) in agricultural soil. Environ Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12665-015-4116-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Lu K, Yang X, Shen J, Robinson B, Huang H, Lui D, Bolan N, Pei J, Wang H (2014) Effect of bamboo and rice straw biochars on the bioavailability of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to sedum plumbizincicola. Agr Ecosyst Environ 191:124–132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  137. Miretzky P, Fernandez-Cirelli A (2008) Phosphates for Pb immobilization in soils: a review. Environ Chem Lett 6:121–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  138. Wu WH, Xie ZM, Xu JM, Wang F, Shi JC, Zhou RB, Jim ZF (2013) Immobilization of trace metals by phosphate in contaminated soil near lead/zinc mine tailings evaluated by sequential extraction and TCLP. J Soils Sediments 13:1386–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11368-013-0751-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Cui YS, Du X, Weng LP, Zhu YG (2008) Effects of rice straw on the speciation of cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) in soils. Geoderma 146:370–377

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Mousa W, Soliman S, El Bialy A, Shier HA (2013) Removal of some heavy metals from aqueous solution using rice straw. J Appl Sci Res 9:1696–1701

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Damanhour University, Damanhour, Egypt

    Eman Hashem Radwan

Authors
  1. Eman Hashem Radwan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eman Hashem Radwan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Abdelazim M. Negm

  2. Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Mohamed Abu-hashim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Radwan, E.H. (2018). Soil Toxicology: Potential Approach on the Egyptian Agro-Environment. In: Negm, A.M., Abu-hashim, M. (eds) Sustainability of Agricultural Environment in Egypt: Part I. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2018_242

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation