Advertisement

Modeling of Water Quality Parameters in Manzala Lake Using Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Stochastic Models

  • Mosaad KhadrEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 72)

Abstract

Egyptian coastal lakes, four lakes, and two lagoons represent about 25% of the Mediterranean total wetlands, and the four lakes are located at the north of Nile Delta and are known as Northern Delta Lakes. Manzala Lake, the largest of the Egyptian lakes, is affected qualitatively and quantitatively by drainage water that flows into the lake. In water quality modeling, deterministic models are frequently used to describe the system behavior. However most ecological systems are so complex and unstable. In some cases, the deterministic models have high chance of failure due to absence of prior information. A deterministic model may also have inevitably errors originated from model structures or other causes. For such cases, new modeling paradigm such as data-driven modeling or data mining has recently been a considerable growth in the development and application of computational intelligence and computer tools with respect to water-related problems. This chapter illustrates the capabilities of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) to predict water quality parameters in Manzala Lake based on water quality parameters of drains associated with the Lake. A combination of data sets was considered as input data for ANFIS models, including discharge, pH, total suspended solids, electrical conductivity, total dissolved solids, water temperature, dissolved oxygen, salinity, and turbidity. The models were calibrated and validated against the measured data. The performance of the models was measured using various prediction skills criteria. Results show that ANFIS models are capable of simulating the water quality parameters and provided reliable prediction of total phosphorus and total nitrogen and, thus, suggesting the suitability of the proposed model as a tool for on-site water quality evaluation.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Egypt Manzala Lake Water quality parameters 

References

  1. 1.
    Diamantopoulou MJ, Papamichail DM, Antonopoulos VZ (2005) The use of a neural network technique for the prediction of water quality parameters. Oper Res 5:115–125Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Khadr M, Elshemy M (2016) Data-driven modeling for water quality prediction case study: the drains system associated with Manzala Lake, Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parparov A, Hambright KD, Hakanson L, Ostapenia A (2006) Water quality quantification: basics and implementation. Hydrobiologia 560:227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hambright KD, Parparov A, Berman T (2000) Indices of water quality for sustainable management and conservation of an arid region lake, Lake Kinneret(Sea of Galilee), Israel. Aquat Conservat Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 10:393–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyd CE (2015) Water quality: an introduction. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapman DV, Organization WH (1996) Water quality assessments: a guide to the use of biota, sediments and water in environmental monitoring. Published on behalf of WHO by F & FN Spon, UNESCO/WHO/UNEPGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Muxika I, Borja A, Bald J (2007) Using historical data, expert judgement and multivariate analysis in assessing reference conditions and benthic ecological status, according to the European Water Framework Directive. Mar Pollut Bull 55:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daniel EB, Camp JV, LeBoeuf EJ, Penrod JR, Dobbins JP, Abkowitz MD (2011) Watershed modeling and its applications: a state-of-the-art review. Open Hydrol J 5:26–50.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101105010026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aghakouchak A, Habib E (2010) Application of a conceptual hydrologic model in teaching hydrologic processes. Int J Eng Educ 26(4):963–973Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orouji H, Bozorg Haddad O, Fallah-Mehdipour E, Mariño M (2013) Modeling of water quality parameters using data-driven models. J Environ Eng 139:947–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zeckoski RW, Smolen MD, Moriasi DN, Frankenberger JR, Feyereisen GW (2015) Hydrologic and water quality terminology as applied to modeling. Trans ASABE 58:1619–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seinfeld JH, Pandis SN (2016) Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ashofteh P-S, Haddad OB, Akbari-Alashti H, Marino MA (2014) Determination of irrigation allocation policy under climate change by genetic programming. J Irrig Drain Eng 141:04014059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shokri A, Haddad OB, Mariño MA (2014) Multi-objective quantity–quality reservoir operation in sudden pollution. Water Resour Manag 28:567–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Marino MA (2014) Genetic programming in groundwater modeling. J Hydrol Eng 19:04014031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghavidel SZZ, Montaseri M (2014) Application of different data-driven methods for the prediction of total dissolved solids in the Zarinehroud basin. Stoch Env Res Risk A 28:2101–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aboutalebi M, Bozorg-Haddad O, Loáiciga HA (2016) Multiobjective design of water-quality monitoring networks in river-reservoir systems. J Environ Eng 143:04016070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chounlamany V, Tanchuling MA, Inoue T (2017) Spatial and temporal variation of water quality of a segment of Marikina River using multivariate statistical methods. Water Sci Technol. wst2017279Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gholizadeh MH, Melesse AM, Reddi L (2016) A comprehensive review on water quality parameters estimation using remote sensing techniques. Sensors 16:1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kantardzic M (2011) Data mining: concepts, models, methods, and algorithms, 2nd edn. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lughofer E (2011) Evolving fuzzy systems-methodologies, advanced concepts and applications, vol 53. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khadr M (2011) Water resources management in the context of drought (an application to the Ruhr river basin in Germany). Shaker, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khadr M, Schlenkhoff A (2014) Integration of data-driven modeling and stochastic modeling for multi-purpose reservoir simulation. 11th international conference on hydroscience & engineering, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Khadr M, Schlenkhoff A (2016) Data-driven stochastic modeling for multi-purpose reservoir simulation. J Appl Water Eng Res 1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23249676.2016.1209439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Solomatine D, See LM, Abrahart R (2009) Data-driven modelling: concepts, approaches and experiences. Practical hydroinformatics. Springer, Berlin, pp 17–30Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Delipetrev B, Mihajlov D, Delipetrev M, Delipetrov T (2010) Model of the hydro-information system of the republic of Macedonia. CIT. J Comput Inf Technol 18:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Solomatine D, Torres L (1996) Neural network approximation of a hydrodynamic model in optimizing reservoir operation. Proceeding of 2nd international conference on hydroinformatics, ZurichGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Abrahart R, Kneale PE, See LM (2004) Neural networks for hydrological modeling. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Abrahart RJ, See L (2000) Comparing neural network and autoregressive moving average techniques for the provision of continuous river flow forecasts in two contrasting catchments. Hydrol Process 14:2157–2172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ansari A, Bakar AA (2014) A comparative study of three artificial intelligence techniques: genetic algorithm, neural network, and fuzzy logic, on scheduling problem. IEEE 4th international conference, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Faruk DÖ (2010) A hybrid neural network and ARIMA model for water quality time series prediction. Eng Appl Artif Intel 23:586–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    GAFRD (2014) Fish statistics yearbook. General authority for fish resources development (GAFRD), Cairo, Egypt. http://www.gafrd.org
  33. 33.
    Khalil MT (1990) The physical and chemical environment of Lake Manzala, Egypt. Hydrobiologia 196:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rashad HM, Abdel-Azeem AM (2010) Lake Manzala, Egypt: a bibliography. Assiut Univ J Bot 39:253–289Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lehner B, Henrichs T, Döll P, Alcamo J (2001) EuroWasser-Model-based assessment of European water resources and hydrology in the face of global change. Kassel World Water Ser 5:114Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Elshemy M, Khadr M, Atta Y, Ahmed A (2016) Hydrodynamic and water quality modeling of Lake Manzala (Egypt) under data scarcity. Environ Earth Sci 75:1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ubeda JR, Allan RN (1994) Stochastic simulation and Monte Carlo methods applied to the assessment of hydro-thermal generating system operation. Top 2:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Juran AA, Arup KS (2007) Artificial neural network model for synthetic streamflow generation. Water Resour Manag 21:1015–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Altunkaynak A, Özger M, Şen Z (2005) Regional Streamflow estimation by standard regional dependence function approach. J Hydraul Eng © ASCE 131:1001–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phien HN, Ruksasilp W (1981) A review of single-site models for monthly Streamflow generation. J Hydrol 52:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Box GEP, Jenkins GM (1970) Time series analysis; forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco, xix, 553 pGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Huber T (1997) Introduction to Monte Carlo simulation. Physics Department, Gustavus Adolphus CollegeGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Weisstein EW. Monte Carlo method, from MathWorld – a Wolfram Web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/MonteCarloMethod.html
  44. 44.
    Garcia AL, Wagner W (2006) Generation of the Maxwellian inflow distribution. J Comput Phys 217:693–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Zadeh LA (1973) Outline of a new approach to analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernetics Smc3:28–44Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Dubrovin T, Jolma A, Turunen E (2002) Fuzzy model for real-time reservoir operation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 128:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shah VA (2009) Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for effect of wall capacitance in a batch reactor. Adv Fuzzy Math 4:69–75. Research India PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Panigrahi DP, Mujumdar PP (2000) Reservoir operation modelling with fuzzy logic. Water Resour Manag 14:89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Metaxiotis K, Psarras J, Samouilidis E (2003) Integrating fuzzy logic into decision suppport systems: current research and future prospects. Inform Manag Comput Secur 11:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mohan S, Prasad MA (2006) Fuzzy logic model for multi reservoir operation. In: Advances in geosciences (a 5-volume set) – Volume 1 Solid earth (SE), pp 117–126Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Chuntian C (1999) Fuzzy optimal model for the flood control system of the upper and middle reaches of Yangtze River. Hydrol Sci J 44:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yegireddi S, Kumar A (2008) Geoacoustic inversion using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Comput Geosci 12:513–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Venugopal C, Devi SP, Rao KS (2010) Predicting ERP user satisfaction – an adaptive Neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach. Intell Inf Manag 2:422–430Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kablan A (2009) Adaptive Neuro-fuzzy inference system for financial trading using intraday seasonality observation model. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 58:479–488Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tang YF, Zhang ZY, Fan GQ (2005) Identification of rhubarb samples based on IR spectra by using Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi 25:521–524Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Khadr M (2016) Forecasting of meteorological drought using hidden Markov model (case study: the upper Blue Nile river basin, Ethiopia). Ain Shams Eng J 7:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringTanta UniversityTantaEgypt

Personalised recommendations