Advertisement

Geographic Characteristics of the Black-Caspian Seas Region

  • Andrey G. Kostianoy
  • Igor S. Zonn
  • Evgeniia A. Kostianaia
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 51)

Abstract

Existing and planned oil and gas pipelines cross or should cross the Caspian and Black Seas, the Caucasus, Mountains in Turkey and Iran, the Karakum Desert, and numerous rivers. Analysis of natural factors causing emergency situations becomes the key issue in assessment of environmental risks. In the Caspian Sea, such natural factors include storms, ice conditions in the Northern Caspian, sea level change, surges, extreme waves, coastal zone flooding, and hazardous geological and geomorphological conditions, such as earthquakes, gas saturated zones, etc. In the Black Sea, these are big depths, hydrosulfide layer deeper than 100 m, unstable sediments on the continental slope and earthquakes. Mountains in Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Iran, Turkmenistan, and Russia represent natural barriers for construction and exploitation of pipelines. This chapter briefly reviews main geographic characteristics in the Black-Caspian Seas Region which impede construction of land and offshore oil and gas pipelines.

Keywords

Earthquakes Geography Ice cover Oil and gas pipelines Plains Rivers Sea level Storm surges The Black Sea The Caspian Sea The Caucasus The Pontic Mountains The Sea of Azov The Tauri Mountains Wind and waves 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The present research has been supported by the Russian Science Foundation under the Project N 14-50-00095. The research has been partially done in the framework of collaboration with Dr. Marilaure Grégoire from the Interfacultary Center for Marine Research (MARE) and Modelling for Aquatic Systems (MAST), University of Liège, Belgium.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhiltsov SS, Zonn IS, Semenov AV (2016) Hydrocarbon potential of the Caspian Region. In: Zhiltsov SS, Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (eds) Oil and gas pipelines in the Black-Caspian Seas Region. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015) http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=12911. Accessed 3 Oct 2015
  3. 3.
    U.S. Energy Information Administration (2016) https://www.eia.gov/beta/international/regions-topics.cfm?RegionTopicID=CSR. Accessed 16 Feb 2016
  4. 4.
    Kostianoy AG, Kostianaia EA, Soloviev DM (2016) Satellite monitoring of Dzhubga-Lazarevskoe-Sochi offshore gas pipeline construction. In: Zhiltsov SS, Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (eds) Oil and gas pipelines in the Black-Caspian Seas Region. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (2016) Environmental risks in production and transportation of hydrocarbons in the Caspian-Black Sea Region. In: Zhiltsov SS, Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (eds) Oil and gas pipelines in the Black-Caspian Seas Region. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kosarev AN, Yablonskaya EA (1994) The Caspian Sea. Academic Publishing, The Hague, 259 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rodionov SN (1994) Global and regional climate interaction: the Caspian Sea experience. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 243 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kosarev AN, Tuzhilkin VS, Kostianoy AG (2004) Main features of the Caspian Sea hydrology. In: Nihoul JCJ, Zavialov PO, Micklin PhP (eds) Dying and dead seas. Climatic versus anthropic causes, NATO ARW/ASI Series. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 159–184Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kosarev AN (2005) Physico-geographical conditions of the Caspian Sea. In: Kostianoy AG, Kosarev AN (eds) The Caspian Sea environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–31Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kosarev AN, Kostianoy AG, Zonn IS, Zhiltsov SS (2014) The Caspian Sea and Kara-Bogaz-Gol Bay. In: Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (eds) The Turkmen Lake Altyn Asyr and water resources in Turkmenistan, vol 28. Springer, Berlin, pp 69–94Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (2016) The Caspian Sea basin. In: Singh VP (ed) Chow’s handbook of applied hydrology, 2nd rev edn. McGraw-Hill Education, Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kosarev AN, Kostianoy AG, Zonn IS (2009) Kara-Bogaz-Gol Bay: physical and chemical evolution. Aquat Geochem 15(1–2):223–236. Special Issue: Saline Lakes and Global ChangeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frolov AV (2003) Modeling the long-term fluctuations of the Caspian Sea level: theory and applications. GEOS, Moscow, 171 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lebedev SA, Kostianoy AG (2005) Satellite Altimetry of the Caspian Sea. Sea, Moscow, 366 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kostianoy AG, Lebedev SA, Solovyov DM (2014) Satellite monitoring of the Caspian Sea, Kara-Bogaz-Gol Bay, Sarykamysh and Altyn Asyr Lakes, and Amu Darya River. In: Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG (eds) The Turkmen Lake Altyn Asyr and water resources in Turkmenistan, vol 28. Springer, Berlin, pp 197–232Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kouraev AV, Papa F, Mognard NM, Buharizin PI, Cazenave A, Cretaux J-F, Dozortseva J, Remy F (2004) Sea ice cover in the Caspian and Aral Seas from historical and satellite data. J Marine Syst 47:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.12.011
  17. 17.
    Panahi BM (2005) Mud volcanism, geodynamics and seismicity of Azerbaijan and the Caspian Sea region. In: Martinelli G, Panahi B (eds) Mud volcanoes, geodynamics and seismicity. Springer, Netherlands, pp 89–104Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Firoozfar A, Bromhead EN, Dykes AP (2012) Caspian Sea level change impacts regional seismicity. J Great Lakes Res 38(4):667–672Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grinevetskiy SR, Zonn IS, Zhiltsov SS, Kosarev AN, Kostianoy AG (2015) The Black Sea encyclopedia. Springer, Berlin, 889 ppGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zonn IS, Kostianoy AG, Kosarev AN, Glantz M (2010) The Caspian Sea encyclopedia. Springer, Berlin, 527 ppGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kostianoy AG, Ginzburg AI, Lebedev SA, Sheremet NA (2014) The Southern seas of Russia. In: Kattsov VM, Semenov SM (eds) Second assessment report of Roshydromet on climate change and its consequences on territory of Russian Federation. Institute of Global Climate and Ecology, Moscow, pp 644–683 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bowker RPG, Audibert GA (1991) Hydrogen sulfide corrosion: its consequences, detection and control. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 19 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brondel D, Edwards R, Hayman A, Hill D, Mehta S, Semerad T (1994) Corrosion in oil industry. Oilfield Rev 4–18Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koteeswaran M (2010) CO2 and H2S corrosion in oil pipelines. Master Thesis, Faculty of mathematics and natural science, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway, 79 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kosarev AN, Kostianoy AG, Shiganova TA (2008) The Azov Sea. In: Kostianoy AG, Kosarev AN (eds) The Black Sea environment. The handbook of environmental chemistry, vol 5: water pollution, Part 5Q. Springer, Berlin, pp 63–90Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bolgov MV, Krasnozhon GF, Lyubushin AA (207) The Caspian Sea. Extreme hydrological events. “Nauka”, Moscow, 381 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shi P, Kasperson R (eds) (2014) World atlas of natural disaster risk. IHDP/Future earth-integrated risk governance project series. Springer, Berlin, 368 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    NASA Earth observatory (2016) http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=86890&src=eoa-iotd. Accessed 5 Mar 2016
  29. 29.
    Bondyrev IV, Tavartkiladze AM, Tsereteli ED, Mamedov RM, Litvinskaya SA, Uzun A, Lominadze GL (2007) Geography of catastrophes and risks in areas of humid subtropics of the Caucasian-Pontides region. “Poligraph”, Tbilisi, 270 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    CHLOETA (2016) Mitigating the wildfire risk in the oil and natural gas industry. White Paper. Edmond, OK 74034, USA, 6 pp. http://www.chloetafire.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/White-Paper-Mitigating-the-Wildfire-Risk-in-the-Oil-Gas-Industry-1.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2016
  31. 31.
    O’Rourke MJ, Liu X (1999) Response of buried pipelines subject to earthquake effects. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, A National Center of Excellence in Advanced Technology Applications, MCEER Monograph No. 3, University at Buffalo Red Jacket Quadrangle Buffalo, NY 14261, USA, 276 ppGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Toprak S, Taskin F (2007) Estimation of earthquake damage to buried pipelines caused by ground shaking. Nat Hazards 40:1–24. doi: 10.1007/sl1069-006-0002-1
  33. 33.
    Meier T (2013) Protecting pipelines from catastrophic effects of earthquakes. Pipeline Gas J 240(7). https://pgjonline.com/2013/07/28/protecting-pipelines-from-catastrophic-effects-of-earthquakes/. Accessed 5 Mar 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrey G. Kostianoy
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Igor S. Zonn
    • 2
    • 4
  • Evgeniia A. Kostianaia
    • 1
  1. 1.P.P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.S.Yu. Witte Moscow UniversityMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Interfacultary Center for Marine Research (MARE) and Modelling for Aquatic Systems (MAST)University of LiègeLiègeBelgium
  4. 4.Engineering Research Production Center for Water Management, Land Reclamation and Ecology “Soyuzvodproject”MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations