Advertisement

Micro-pollutants in Hospital Effluent: Their Fate, Risk and Treatment Options

  • Paola VerlicchiEmail author
  • Alessio Galletti
  • Mira Petrovic
  • Damià Barceló
Chapter
Part of the The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry book series (HEC, volume 20)

Abstract

This chapter deals with the physicochemical characteristics of hospital effluents, focusing on both macropollutants (conventional contaminants) and micro-pollutants (pharmaceutical compounds, heavy metals and diagnostic agents). It compares their typical concentration ranges measured in hospital effluents and urban wastewaters and then discusses the behaviour of micro-pollutants, mainly pharmaceutical compounds during common treatment processes and upon their release into the environment, attempting to find correlations with their physical properties. It then goes on to provide an overview of the most commonly adopted strategies for managing and treating hospital effluents worldwide, focusing on the ability of the various treatments to remove the wide spectrum of pharmaceuticals contained therein. Some considerations are also made on the tools available for assessing the environmental risks posed by the discharge of hospital effluents, and, finally, guidelines for the best treatment options are proposed.

Keywords

Environmental risk assessment Hospital effluents Management and treatment Pharmaceuticals 

References

  1. 1.
    Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36:1202–1211Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster AL (2007) Occurrence and fate of endocrine disruptors through the San Marco Wastewater treatment plant. Thesis of Master of Science, Texas State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fatta-Kassinos D, Meric S, Nikolaou A (2011) Pharmaceutical residues in environmental waters and wastewater: current status of knowledge and future research. Anal Bioanal Chem 399:251–275Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khan S, Ongerth J (2005) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals at an Australian sewage treatment plant. Water 32:35–39Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joss A, Andersen H, Ternes T, Richle PR, Siegrist H (2004) Removal of estrogen in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: consequences for plant optimization. Environ Sci Technol 38:3047–3055Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joss A, Keller E, Alder AC, Gobel A, McArdell CS, Ternes T, Siegrist H (2005) Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 39:3139–3152Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duong H, Pham N, Nguyen H, Hoang T, Pham H, Ca Pham V, Berg M, Giger W, Alder A (2008) Occurrence, fate and antibiotic resistance of fluoroquinolone antibacterials in hospital wastewaters in Hanoi, Vietnam. Chemosphere 72:968–973Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suarez S, Lema JM, Omil F (2009) Pre-treatment of hospital wastewater by coagulation-flocculation and flotation. Bioresour Technol 100:2138–2146Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Petrovic M, Barcelò D (2010) Hospital effluents as a source of emerging pollutants: an overview of micropollutants and sustainable treatment options. J Hydrol 389:416–428Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sim WJ, Lee JW, Lee ES, Shin SK, Hwang SR, Oh JE (2011) Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater from households, livestock farms, hospitals and pharmaceutical manufactures. Chemosphere 82:179–186Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawkshead JJ (2008) Hospital wastewater containing pharmaceuticals active compounds and drug-resistant organisms: a source of environmental toxicity and increased antibiotic resistance. J Residual Sci Tech 5:51–60Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pauwels B, Verstraete W (2006) The treatment of hospital wastewater: an appraisal. J Water Health 4:405–416Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Masotti L (2010) Management of hospital wastewaters: the case of the effluent of a large hospital situated in a small town. Water Sci Technol 61:2507–2519Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schuster A, Hadrick C, Kummerer K (2008) Flows of active pharmaceutical ingredients originating from health care practises on a local, regional, and national level in Germany – is hospital effluent treatment an effective approach for risk reduction? Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 8:457–471Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leprat P (1999) Caractéristiques et impacts des rejets liquides hospitaliers. Tech Hosp 634:56–57Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Altin A, Altin S, Degirmenci M (2003) Characteristics and treatability of hospital (medical) wastewaters. Fresenius Environ Bull 12:1098–1108Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kummerer K, Erbe T, Gartiser S, Brinker L (1998) AOX-emissions from hospital into municipal wastewater. Chemosphere 36:2437–2445Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wen X, Ding H, Huang X, Liu R (2004) Treatment of hospital wastewater using a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem 39:1427–1431Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Emmanuel E, Perrodin Y, Keck G, Blanchard JM, Vermande P (2005) Ecotoxicological risk assessment of hospital wastewater: a proposed framework for raw effluents discharging into urban sewer network. J Hazard Mater A117:1–11Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Emmanuel E, Pierre MG, Perrodin Y (2009) Groundwater contamination by microbiological and chemical substances released from hospital wastewater: health risk assessment for drinking water consumers. Environ Int 35:718–726Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hartemann P, Hautemaniere A, Joyeux M (2005) La problématique des effluents hospitaliers. Hygiène 13:369–374Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsakoma M, Anagnostopoulou E, Gidarakos E (2007) Hospital waste management and toxicity evaluation: a case study. Waste Manag 27:912–920Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Boillot C, Bazin C, Tissot-Guerraz F, Droguet J, Perraud M, Cetre JC, Trepo D, Perrodin Y (2008) Daily physicochemical, microbiological and ecotoxicological fluctuations of a hospital effluent according to technical and care activities. Sci Total Environ 403:113–129Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Al Aukidy M (2011) Hospital wastewaters: quali-quantitative characterization and strategies for their treatment and disposal. In: Sharma SK, Sanghi R (eds) Water treatment and pollution prevention: advances in research. Springer (in press)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lopez N, Deblonde T, Hartemann Ph (2010) Les effluents liquid hospitaliers. Hygiène 18:405–410Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gomez MJ, Aguera A, Mezcua M, Hurtado J, Mocholi F, Fernandez-Alba AR (2007) Simultaneous analysis of neutral and acidic pharmaceuticals as well as related compounds by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in wastewater. Talanta 73:314–320Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kummerer K, Henninger A (2003) Promoting resistance by the emission of antibiotics from hospital and households into effluent. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:1203–1214Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwartz T, Kohnen W, Jansen B, Obst U (2003) Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their resistance genes in wastewater, surface water, and water biofilms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:325–335Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adelowo O, Fagade OE, Oke AJ (2008) Prevalence of co-resistance to disinfectants and clinically relevant antibiotics in bacterial isolates from three hospital laboratory wastewaters in South-western Nigeria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:1993–1997Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chitnis V, Chitnis S, Vaidya K, Ravikant S, Patil S, Chitnis DS (2004) Bacterial population changes in hospital effluent treatment plant in central India. Water Res 38:441–447Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Prado T, Silva DM, Guilayn WC, Rose TL, Gaspar AMC, Miagostovich MP (2011) Quantification and molecular characterization of enteric viruses detected in effluents from two hospital wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 45:1287–1297Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kummerer K (2001) Drugs in the environment: emission of drugs, diagnostic aids and disinfectants into wastewater by hospital in relation to other sources - a review. Chemosphere 45:957–969Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kummerer K, Helmers E, Hubner P, Mascart G, Milandri M, Reinthaler F, Zwakenberg M (1999) European hospitals as a source for platinum in the environment in comparison with other sources. Sci Total Environ 225:155–165Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lenz K, Mahnik SN, Weissenbacher N, Mader RM, Krenn P, Hann S, Koellensperger G, Uhl M, Knasmuller S, Ferk F, Bursch W, Fuerhacker M (2007) Monitoring, removal and risk assessment of cytostatic drugs in hospital wastewater. Water Sci Technol 56:141–149Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kummerer K, Helmers E (2000) Hospital effluents as a source of gadolinium in the aquatic environment. Environ Sci Technol 34:573–577Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Masotti L (2008) Caratterizzazione e trattabilità di reflui ospedalieri: in-dagine sperimentale (con sistemi MBR) presso un ospedale dell’area ferrarese, Proc. Sidisa Conference Florence, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Barceló D (2003) Emerging pollutants in water analysis. Trac-Trend Anal Chem 22:xiv–xviGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jjemba PK (2006) Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment. Ecotox Environ Safe 63:113–130Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Halling-Sorensen B, Nors Nielsen S, Lanzky PF, Ingerslev F, Holten Lutzhoft HC, Jorgensen SE (1998) Occurrence, fate and effects of pharmaceutical substances in the environment- a review. Chemosphere 36:357–393Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lienert J, Burki T, Escher BI (2007) Reducing micropollutants with source control: substance flow analysis of 212 pharmaceuticals in faeces and urine. Water Sci Technol 55:87–96Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Heberer T (2002) Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. Toxicol Lett 131:5–17Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Galletti A, Petrovic M, Barcelò D (2011) Hospital effluent: investigation of the concentrations and distribution of pharmaceuticals and environmental risk assessment (in press)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lin AYC, Yu TH, Lin CF (2008) Pharmaceutical contamination in residential, industrial, and agricultural waste streams: risk to aqueous environments in Taiwan. Chemosphere 74:131–141Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Galletti A, Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Petrovic M, Barcelò D (2011) Hospital as a source of emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals): results of an investigation on its final effluent chemical characteristics. Proc. CEST 2011, Rhodes A578–A587Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Tauxe-Wuersch A, De Alencastro LP, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2006) Trace determination of tamoxifen and 5-fluorouracil in hospital and urban wastewaters. Int J Environ Anal Chem 86:473–485Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gomez MJ, Petrovic M, Fernandez-Alba AR, Barcelò D (2006) Determination of pharmaceuticals of various therapeutic classes by solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis in hospital effluent wastewaters. J Chromatogr A 1114:224–233Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nagarnaik P, Batt A, Boulanger B (2011) Source characterization of nervous active pharmaceutical ingredients in healthcare facility wastewaters. J Environ Manage 92:872–877Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Heberer T, Feldman D (2005) Contribution of effluents from hospital and private households to the total loads of diclofenac and carbamazepine in municipal sewage effluents – modeling versus measurements. J Hazard Mater 122:211–218Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Escher BI, Baumgartner R, Koller M, Treyer K, Lienert J, McArdell CS (2011) Environmental toxicology and risk assessment of pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater. Water Res 45:75–92Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    EMEA (2003) Note for guidance on environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use. DRAFT. CPMP/SWP/4447/00 draft corr. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical ProductsGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    EMEA (2006) Guideline on the environmental risk assessment of medicinal products for human use CHMP/SWP/4447/00. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    DDD data web site URL: http://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/. Accessed 2 Nov 2011
  53. 53.
    Kummerer K (2009) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment – a review – Part I. Chemosphere 75:417–439Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Epi: suite program available at the website (accessed 28 Oct 2011) http://www.epa.gov/oppt/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm
  55. 55.
    Suarez S, Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2008) How are pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removed from urban wastewaters? Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:125–138Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ternes TA, Joss A (2006) Human Pharmaceuticals, Hormones and Fragrances. The challenge of micropollutants in urban water management. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Joss A, Zabczynsk S, Gobel A, Hoffmann B, Loffler D, McArdell CS, Ternes TA, Thomsen A, Siegrist H (2006) Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme. Water Res 40:1686–1696Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Radjenovic J, Petrovic M, Barceló D (2009) Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Water Res 43:831–841Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, Gans O, Kroiss H (2005) The solids retention time—a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res 39:97–106Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    USEPA (2009) Nutrient Control Design Manual, State of Technology Review report, EPA/600/R-09/012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kummerer K (2009) The presence of pharmaceuticals in the environment due to human use – present knowledge and future challenges. J Environ Manage 90:2354–2366Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Golet EM, Alder AC, Giger W (2002) Environmental exposure and risk assessment of fluoroquinolone antibacterial agents in wastewater and river water of the Glatt Valley Watershed, Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 36:3645–3651Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Gu C, Karthikeyan KG (2005) Sorption of the antimicrobial ciprofloxacin to aluminum and iron hydrous oxides. Environ Sci Technol 39:9166–9173Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Christian T, Schneider RJ, Färber HA, Skutlarek D, Meyer MT, Goldbach HE (2003) Determination of antibiotic residues in manure, soil, and surface waters. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 31:36–44Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Gu C, Karthikeyan KG (2008) Sorption of the antibiotic tetracycline to humic-mineral complexes. J Environ Qual 37:704–711Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2005) Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment. Water Res 39:4790–4796Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Bendz D, Paxéus NA, Ginn TR, Loge FJ (2005) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceutically active in the environment, a case study: Hoje River in Sweden. J Hazard Mater 122:195–204Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Vieno N, Tuhkanen T, Kronberg L (2007) Elimination of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in Finland. Water Res 41:1001–1012Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Jalonen HG (1988) Simultaneous determination of tamoxifen citrate and its E-isomer impurity in bulk drug and tablets by high-performance liquid-chromatography. J Pharm Sci 77:810–813Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Andreozzi R, Raffaele M, Nicklas P (2003) Pharmaceuticals in STP effluents and their solar photodegradation in aquatic environment. Chemosphere 50:1319–1330Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Werner JJ, Arnold WA, McNeill K (2006) Water hardness as a photochemical parameter: tetracycline photolysis as a function of calcium concentration, magnesium concentration, and pH. Environ Sci Technol 40:7236–7241Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kallenborn R, Fick J, Lindberg R, Moe M, Nielsen KM, Tysklind M, Vasskog T (2008) Pharmaceutical residues in Northern European environments: consequences and perspectives. In: Kümmerer K (ed) Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Sources, fate, effects and risk, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 61–74Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Turiel E, Bordin G, Rodríguez AR (2005) Study of the evolution and degradation products of ciprofloxacin and oxolinic acid in river water samples by HPLC–UV/MS/MS–MS. J Environ Monit 7:189–195Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Hu L, Flanders PM, Miller PL, Strathmann TJ (2008) Oxidation of sulfamethoxazole and related antimicrobial agents by TiO2 photocatalysis. Water Res 41:2612–2626Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Sukul P, Lamshöft M, Zühlke S, Spiteller M (2008) Photolysis of (14)C-sulfadiazine in water and manure. Chemosphere 71:717–725Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Al Aukidy M (2011) Best practices in the management of hospital effluents. Proc. VI EWRA International Symposium Water Engineering and Management in a Changing Environment, Catania, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kreuzinger N, Clara M, Droiss H (2004) Relevance of the Sludge Retention Time (SRT) as de-sign criteria for wastewater treatment plants for the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals from wastewater. Water Sci Technol 50:149–156Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Kimura K, Hara H, Watanabe Y (2007) Elimination of selected acidic pharmaceuticals from municipal wastewaters by activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors. Environ Sci Technol 41:3708–3714Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Oppenheimer J, Wert EC, Yoon Y (2007) Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination 202:156–181Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Radjenovic J, Petrovic M, Barceló D (2007) Analysis of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and removal using a membrane bioreactor. Anal Bioanal Chem 387:1365–1377Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Ottoson J, Hansen A, Bjorlenius B, Norder H, Stenstrom TA (2006) Removal of viruses, parasitic protozoa and microbial indicators in conventional and membrane processes in a wastewater pilot plant. Water Res 40:1449–1457Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zhang K, Farahbakhsh K (2007) Removal of native coliphages and coliform bacteria from municipal wastewater by various wastewater treatment processes: implications to water reuse. Water Res 41:2816–2824Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Batt AL, Kim S, Aga DS (2007) Comparison of the occurrence of antibiotics in four-full scale wastewater treatment plants with varying designs and operations. Chemosphere 68:428–435Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Ikehata K, Naghashkar NJ, El-Din MG (2006) Degradation of aqueous pharmaceuticals by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone-Sci Eng 28:353–414Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bolong N, Ismail AF, Salim MR, Matsuura T (2009) A review of the effects of emerging contaminants in wastewaters and options for their removal. Desalination 239:229–246Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Snyder SA, Adham S, Redding AM, Cannon FS, DeCarolis J, Oppenheimer J, Wert EC, Yoon Y (2006) Role of membranes and activated carbon in the removal of endocrine disruptors and pharmaceuticals. Desalination 202:156–181Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Watkinson AJ, Murby EJ, Costanzo SD (2007) Removal of antibiotics in conventional and advanced wastewater treatment: implications for environmental discharge and wastewater recycling. Water Res 41:4164–4174Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Emmanuel E, Keck G, Blanchard J, Vermande P, Perrodin Y (2004) Toxicological effects of disinfections using sodium hypochlorite on aquatic organisms and its contribution to AOX formation in hospital wastewater. Environ Int 30:891–900Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Galletti A, Al Aukidy M, Verlicchi P, Petrovic M, Barcelò D (2010) Pharmaceuticals removal in a H-SSF treating a secondary domestic wastewater – an experimental investigation. Proc. IWA Conference Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Venice, 382–384Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Matamoros V, Garcia J, Bajona JM (2008) Organic micropollutant removal in a full-scale surface flow constructed wetland fed with secondary effluent. Water Res 42:653–660Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Bartels P, von Tumpling W (2008) The environmental fate of the antiviral drug oseltamivir carboxylate in different waters. Sci Total Environ 405:215–225Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Beier S, Cramer C, Koster S, Mauer C, Palmowski L, Schroeder HF, Pinnekamp J (2011) Full scale membrane bioreactor treatment of hospital wastewater as forerunner for hot-spot wastewater treatment solutions in high density urban areas. Water Sci Technol 63:66–71Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Beier S, Koster S, Veltmann K, Schroder HFr, Pinnekamp J (2010) Treatment of hospital wastewater effluent by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Water Sci Technol 61:1691–1698Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Liu Q, Zhou Y, Chen L, Zheng X (2010) Application of MBR for hospital wastewater treatment in China. Desalination 250:605–608Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Bound JP, Voulvoulis N (2006) Predicted and measured concentrations for selected pharmaceuticals in UK rivers: implications for risk assessment. Water Res 40:2585–2592Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Furhacker M (2008) The Water Framework Directive – can we reach the target? Water Sci Technol 57:9–17Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Council Directive 93/39/EEC 14 June 1993 amending Directives 65/65/EEC, 75/318/EEC and 75/319/EEC in respect of medicinal productsGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    EMEA (2001) Discussion paper on environmental risk assessment on non-genetically modified organisms (non-GMO) containing medicinal products for human use. CPMP/SWP/4447/00 draft corr. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medical ProductsGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Lienert J, Gudel K, Escher BI (2007) Screening method for ecotoxicological hazard assessment of 42 pharmaceuticals considering human metabolism and excretory routes. Environ Sci Technol 41:4471–4478Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Brown VM (1968) The calculation of the acute toxicity of mixture of poisons to rainbow trout. Water Res 2:723–733Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Altenburger R, Nendza M, Schuurmann G (2003) Mixture toxicity and its modeling by quantitative structure-activity relationships. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1900–1915Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Altenburger R, Walter H, Grote M (2004) What contributes to the combined effect of a complex mixture? Environ Sci Technol 38:6353–6362Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hernando MD, Mezcua M, Fernandez-Alba AR, Barceló D (2006) Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments. Talanta 69:334–342Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    de Souza SML, de Vasconcelos EC, Dziedzic M (2009) Environmental risk assessment of antibiotics: an intensive care unit analysis. Chemosphere 77:962–967Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Zhao JL, Ying GG, Liu YS, Chen F, Yang JF, Wang L, Yang XB, Stauber JL, Warne MSt J (2010) Occurrence and screening level risk assessment of human pharmaceutical in the Pearl River system, South China. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:1377–1384Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Tauxe-Wuersch A, De Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2005) Occurrence of several acidic drugs in sewage treatment plants in Switzerland and risk assessment. Water Res 39:1761–1772Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    EC (2003) Technical guidance on risk assessment, TGD Part II. Technical Report, Institute for health and consumer protection, European Chemicals Bureau, European Commission (EC)Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Sanderson H, Johnson DJ, Wilson CJ, Brain RA, Solomon KR (2003) Probabilistic hazard assessment of environmentally occurring pharmaceuticals toxicity to fish, Daphnia and algae by ECOSAR screening. Toxicol Lett 144:383–395Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Stuer-Lauridsen F, Birkved M, Hansen LP, Holten Lutzhoft H-C, Halling-Sùrensen B (2000) Environmental risk assessment of human pharmaceuticals in Denmark after normal therapeutic use. Chemosphere 40:783–793Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Boillot C (2008) Évaluation des risques écotoxicologiques liés aux rejets d’effluents hospitaliers dans les milieux aquatiques. Contribution à l’amélioration de la phase « caractérisation des effets ». PhD Thesis. Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon, France, N° d’ordre ISAL 0021Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Ferrari B, Paxeus N, Lo Giudice R, Pollio A, Garric J (2003) Ecotoxicological impact of pharmaceuticals found in treated wastewaters: study of carbamazepine, clofibric acid, and diclofenac. Ecotox Environ Safe 55:359–370Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Escher BI, Baumgartner R, Lienert J, Fenner K (2009) In: Boxall ABA (ed) Reaction and processes, Part P – transformation products of synthetic chemicals in the environment, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 205–244. doi:  210.1007/1978-1003-1540-88273-88272
  113. 113.
    Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2007) Occurrence and risk assessment of pharmaceutically active compounds in wastewater treatment plants. A case study: Seville city (Spain). Environ Int 33:596–601Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Santos LHMLM, Araujo AN, Fachini A, Pena A, Delerue-Matos C, Montenegro MCBSM (2010) Ecotoxicological aspects related to the presence of pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment. J Hazard Mater 175:45–95Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Chitnis V, Chitnis D, Patil S, Kant R (2000) Hospital effluent as a source of multiple drug-resistant bacteria. Curr Sci India 79:989–991Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Kummerer K (2004) Resistance in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:311–320Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Jolibois B, Guerbet M (2005) Evaluation of industrial, hospital and domestic wastewater genotoxicity with the Salmonella fluctuation test and the SOS chromotest. Mutat Res 565(2):151–162Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Ferk F, Misik M, Grummt T, Majer B, Fuerhacker M, Buchmann C, Vital M, Uhl M, Lenz K, Grillitsch B, Parzefall W, Nersesyan A, Knasmuller S (2009) Genotoxic effects of wastewater from an oncological ward. Mutat Res 672:69–75Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Hirsch R, Ternes TA, Haberer K, Kratz KL (1999) Occurrence of antibiotics in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ 225:109–118Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Al-Almad A, Daschner FD, Kummerer K (1999) Biodegradability of cefotiam, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, penicillin G and sulfamethoxazole and inhibition of wastewater bacteria. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 37:158–163Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Clara M, Strenn B, Kreuzinger N (2004) Carbamazepine as a possible anthropogenic marker in the aquatic environment: investigations on the behaviour of carbamazepine in wastewater treatment and during groundwater infiltration. Water Res 38:947–954Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Blaise C, Gagné F, Eulaffroy P, Férard J-F (2007) Ecotoxicology of selected pharmaceuticals of urban origin discharged to the Saint-Lauwence river (Québec, Canada): a review. Braz J Aquat Sci Technol 10:29–51Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Berto J, Rochenbach GC, Barreiros MAA, Correa AXR, Silva SP, Radetski CM (2009) Physico-chemical microbiological and ecotoxicological evaluation of a septic tank/Fenton reaction combination for the treatment of hospital wastewaters. Ecotox Environ Safe 72:1076–1081Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Hollender J, Zimmermann SG, Koepke S, Krauss M, McArdell CS, Ort C, Singer H, von Gunten U, Siegrist H (2009) Elimination of organic micropollutants in a municipal wastewater treatment plant Upgraded with a full-scale Post ozonation followed by sand filtration. Environ Sci Technol 43:7862–7869Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Verlicchi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessio Galletti
    • 1
  • Mira Petrovic
    • 2
    • 3
  • Damià Barceló
    • 2
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of EngineeringUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly
  2. 2.Catalan Institute for Water Research (ICRA)GironaSpain
  3. 3.Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA)BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Department of Environmental ChemistryIDAEA-CSICBarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations