Skip to main content

Consequences of Climate Variability and Human Water Demand on Freshwater Ecosystems: A Mediterranean Perspective from the United States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean

Part of the book series: The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry ((HEC,volume 8))

Abstract

Climate variability, climate change, climate risk, and climate adaptation are topics of great interest worldwide. Mediterranean climates are particularly vulnerable to these climate-related issues because of the strong seasonality of precipitation, high human demand for water, and predicted increasingly variable worldwide climate. I will address some of these issues in Mediterranean climates from research on the Sacramento River, the San Joaquin River, and the California Bay-Delta in the western USA. The Sacramento River and San Joaquin River converge to form the California Delta. Waters from these catchments, which drain 40% of the landmass of California and discharge about 47% of the available water from California, are extensively dammed, diverted, and exported. Exports from the Delta provide a portion of the drinking water for ∼25 million people and sustain more than a million hectares of irrigated agriculture. Interannual variability in river discharge is linked to Pacific climate forcing in the late fall, winter, and early spring with peak discharge from rainstorms and snowmelt in the winter and spring. Warming coupled with drought has caused substantive change in the timing of runoff and in the composition of upland vegetation in large areas of the catchment. Human adaptation to water supply risks involves shifts to groundwater supplies, increased conservation, and water reuse or desalinization. Many of the indicator variables used to assess the ecological condition of aquatic ecosystems are highly sensitive to drought and climate change. Factoring variability and climate change into integrated ecological assessments is an ongoing challenge and effort. Finally, some of the insights from managing and researching these river ecosystems and the Delta in California, USA are discussed in the context of water resource challenges in Mediterranean climates in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

BDCP:

Bay Delta Conservation Plan

CALSIM:

California Water Resources Simulation Model

CALVIN:

California Value Integration Network

CDEC:

California Data Exchange Center

CVP:

Central Valley Project

DDT:

Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

DOC:

Dissolved organic carbon

Hg:

Mercury

IEP:

Interagency Ecological Program

kW h m−3 :

Kilowatt hours per cubic meter

MW-h:

Megawatt hour

RO:

Reverse osmosis

Se:

Selenium

SWP:

State Water Project

TDS:

Total dissolved solids

USGS:

United States Geological Survey

References

  1. Carter JL, Resh VH (2005) Pacific coast rivers of the coterminous United States. In: Benke AC, Cushing CE (eds) Rivers of North America. Elsevier Inc, San Diego, pp 541–590

    Google Scholar 

  2. Culberson C, Bottorff L, Roberson M, Soderstrom E (2008) Geophysical setting and consequences of management in the Bay-Delta. In: Healey MC, Dettinger MD, Norgaard RB (eds) The State of Bay-Delta Science. CALFED Science Program, Sacramento, pp 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knowles N (2002) Natural and management influences on freshwater inflows and salinity in the San Francisco Estuary at monthly to interannual scales. Water Resour Res 38(12):1289. doi: 10.1029/2001WR000360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Healey M, Dettinger M, Culberson S, Bottorff L (2008) Water supply. In: Healey MC, Dettinger MD, Norgaard RB (eds) The State of Bay-Delta Science. CALFED Science Program, Sacramento, pp 121–138

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett WA (2005) Critical assessment of the Delta smelt population in the San Francisco Estuary, California. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 3(2) Article 1. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews

  6. Kimmerer WJ (2004) Open water processes of the San Francisco Estuary: from physical forcing to biological responses. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 2(1) Article 1. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews

  7. Luoma S, Anderson S, Bergamaschi B, Holm L, Ruhl C, Schoellhamer D, Stewart R (2008) Water quality. In: Healey MC, Dettinger MD, Norgaard RB (eds) The State of Bay-Delta Science. CALFED Science Program, Sacramento, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wright SA, Schoellhamer DH (2004) Trends in the sediment yield of the Sacramento River, California, 1957–2001. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 2(2) Article 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews

  9. Alpers CN, Hunerlach MP, May JT, Hothem RL (2005) Mercury contamination from historical gold mining in California. United States Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2005-3014, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Presser TS, Luoma SN (2006) Forecasting selenium discharges to the San Francisco Bay-Delta Estuary: ecological effects of a proposed San Luis drain extension. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1646, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amweg EL, Weston DP, Ureda NM (2005) Use and toxicity of pyrethroid pesticides in the Central Valley, California, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(4):966–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weston DP, You J, Lydy MJ (2004) Distribution and toxicity of sediment-associated pesticides in agriculture-dominated water bodies of California’s Central Valley. Environ Sci Technol 38(10):2752–2759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weston DP, Holmes RW, You J, Lydy MJ (2005) Aquatic toxicity due to residential use of pyrethroid insecticides. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9778–9784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weston DP, Holmes RW, Lydy MJ (2009) Residential runoff as a source of pyrethroid pesticides to urban creeks. Environ Pollut 157(1):287–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. You J, Pehkonen S, Weston DP, Lydy MJ (2008) Chemical availability and sediment toxicity of pyrethroid insecticides to Hyalella azteca: Application to field sediment with unexpectedly low toxicity. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(10):2124–2130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jassby AD (2008) Phytoplankton in the upper San Francisco Estuary: recent biomass trends, their causes, and their trophic significance. San Francisco Estuary Watershed Sci 6(1) Article 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/jmie/sfews

  17. Dugdale RC, Wilkerson FP, Hogue VE, Marchi A (2007) The role of ammonium and nitrate in spring bloom development in San Francisco Bay. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 73(1–2):17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkerson FP, Dugdale RC, Hogue VE, Marchi A (2006) Phytoplankton blooms and nitrogen productivity in San Francisco Bay. Estuaries Coasts 29(3):401–416

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman PW, Boyer G, Waller C, Gehrts K (2005) Distribution and toxicity of a colonial Microcystis aeruginosa bloom in the San Francisco Bay Estuary. Hydrobiologia 541:87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lehman PW, Boyer G, Satchwell M, Waller S (2008) The influence of environmental conditions on the seasonal variation of Microcystis cell density and microcystins concentration in San Francisco Estuary. Hydrobiologia 600:187–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kimmerer W, Brown L, Culberson S, Moyle P, Nobriga M, Thompson J (2008) Aquatic ecosystems. In: Healey MC, Dettinger MD, Norgaard RB (eds) The State of Bay-Delta Science. CALFED Science Program, Sacramento, pp 73–102

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lund J, Hanak E, Fleenor W, Howitt R, Mount J, Moyle P (2007) Envisioning futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lund J, Hanak E, Fleenor W, Bennett W, Howitt R, Mount J, Moyle P (2008) Comparing futures for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sommer T, Armor C, Baxter R, Breuer R, Brown L, Chotkowski M, Culberson S, Feyrer F, Gingras M, Herbold B, Kimmerer W, Mueller-Solger A, Nobriga M, Souza K (2007) The collapse of pelagic fishes in the upper San Francisco Estuary. Fisheries 32:270–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jassby AD, Cloern JE, Cole BE (2002) Annual primary production: patterns and mechanisms of change in a nutrient-rich tidal estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 47:698–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brown LR, Michniuk D (2007) Littoral fish assemblages of the alien-dominated Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, California, 1980–1983 and 2001–2003. Estuaries Coasts 30:186–200

    Google Scholar 

  27. Moyle PB (2002) Inland fishes of California, 2nd edn. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manage 30(4):492–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Healey MC, Dettinger MD, Norgaard RB (eds) (2008) The State of Bay-Delta Science. CALFED Science Program, Sacramento, 174 pp

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shannon MA, Bohn PW, Elimelech M, Georgiadis JG, Mariñas BJ (2008) Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 452:301–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee RW, Glater J, Cohen Y, Martin C, Kovac K, Milobar MN, Bartel DW (2003) Low-pressure RO membrane desalination of agricultural drainage water. Desalination 155(2):109–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Asano T, Cotruvo JA (2004) Groundwater recharge with reclaimed municipal wastewater: health and regulatory considerations. Water Res 38(8):1941–1951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Knowles N, Dettinger MD, Cayan DR (2006) Trends in snowfall versus rainfall for the western United States. J Clim 19(18):4545–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Knowles N, Cayan DR (2004) Elevational dependence of projected hydrological changes in the San Francisco Estuary and watershed. Clim Change 62:319–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cayan DR, Bromirski PD, Hayhoc K, Tyree M, Dettinger DD, Flick RE (2008) Climate change projections of sealevel extremes along the california coast. Clim Change 87(Suppl 1):S57–S73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford N. Dahm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dahm, C.N. (2010). Consequences of Climate Variability and Human Water Demand on Freshwater Ecosystems: A Mediterranean Perspective from the United States. In: Sabater, S., Barceló, D. (eds) Water Scarcity in the Mediterranean. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry(), vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2010_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics