Skip to main content

Morphometric Analysis of the Lumbar Vertebrae Concerning the Optimal Screw Selection for Transpedicular Stabilization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((CLEXBI,volume 1133))

Abstract

Transpedicular stabilization is a frequently used spinal surgery for fractures, degenerative changes, or neoplastic processes. Improper screw fixation may cause substantial vascular or neurological complications. This study seeks to define detailed morphometric measurements of the pedicle (height, width, and surface area) in the aspects of screw length and girth selection and the trajectory of its implantation, i.e., sagittal and transverse angle of placement. The study was based on CT examinations of 100 Caucasian patients (51 women and 49 men) aged 27–75 with no anatomical, degenerative, or post-traumatic spine changes. The results were stratified by gender and body side, and they were counter compared with the available literature database. Pedicle height decreased from L1 to L4, ranging from 15.9 to 13.3 mm. Pedicle width increased from L1 to L5, extending from 6.1 to 13.2 mm. Pedicle surface area increased from L1 to L5, ranging from 63 to 140 mm2. Distance from the point of entry into the pedicle to the anterior surface of the vertebral body, defining the maximum length of a transpedicular screw, varied from 54.0 to 50.2 mm. Variations concerning body sides were inappreciable. A transverse angle of screw trajectory extended from 20° to 32°, shifting caudally from L1 to L5, with statistical differences in the L3–L5 segments. A sagittal angle varied from 10° to 12°, without such definite relations. We conclude that the L1 and L2 segments display the most distinct morphometric similarities, while the greatest differences, in both genders, are noted for L3, L4, and L5. The findings enable the recommendation of the following screw diameters: 4 mm for L1–L2, 5 mm for L3, 6 mm for L4–L5, and the length of 50 mm. We believe the study has extended clinical knowledge on lumbar spine morphometry, essential in the training physicians engaged in transpedicular stabilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abuzayed B, Tutunculer B, Kucukyuruk TS (2010) Anatomic basis of anterior and posterior instrumentation of the spine: morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat 32:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya S, Dorje T, Sirvastava A (2010) Lower dorsal and lumbar pedicle morphometry in Indian population. Spine 35:378–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam MM, Waqas M, Shallwani H, Javed G (2014) Lumbar morphometry: a study of lumbar vertebrae from a Pakistan population using computed tomography scans. Asian Spine J 8:421–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figeiredo R, Jarzem P, Ouellet J, Weber MH (2015) Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 24:990–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, Steffee AD (1987) A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae. Spine 12:362–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chadha M, Balain B, Maini L, Dhaon BK (2003) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic, lumbar, and S1 vertebrae: an Indian perspective. Spine 28:744–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung K, Ruan D, Chan F, Fang D (1994) Computed tomographic osteometry of Asian lumbar pedicles. Spine 19:1495–1498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dzierżanowski J, Szarmach A, Słoniewski P, Czapiewski P, Piskunowicz M, Bandurski T, Szmuda T (2014) The posterior communicating artery: morphometric study in 3D angio–computed tomography reconstruction. The proof of the mathematical definition of the hypoplasia. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 73:286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebraheim NA, Rollins JR, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1996) Projection of the lumbar pedicle and its morphometric analysis. Spine 21:1296–1300

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadioglu H, Tacki E, Levent M, Arik M, Aydin I (2003) Measurements of the lumbar pedicles in the Eastern Anatolian population. Surg Radiol Anat 25:120–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim NH, Lee HM, Chung IH, Kim HJ, Kim SJ (1994) Morphometric study of the pedicles of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in Koreans. Spine 19:1390–1394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klatka J, Grywalska E, Hymos A, Krasowska E, Mielnik M, Siwicka–Gieroba D, Markowicz J, Trojanowski P, Olszański W, Roliński J (2017) Subpopulations of natural killer–T–like cells before and after surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. Cent Eur J Immunol 42(3):252–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleck CJ, Cullimore I, Lafleur M, Lindley E, Rentschler ME, Burger EL, Cain CM, Patel VV (2016) A new 3–dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy. Eur Spine J 25:1764–1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel ME, Schmidt H, Wilke HJ (2010) Prediction equations for human thoracic and lumbar vertebral morphometry. J Anat 216:320–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien SB, Liou NH, Wu SS (2007) Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 16:1215–1222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mageed M, Berner D, Julke H, Hohaus C, Brehm W, Gerlach K (2013) Is sheep lumbar spine a suitable alternative model for human spinal researches? Morphometrical comparison study. Lab Anim Res 29:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahato NK (2011) Disc spaces, vertebral dimensions, and angle values at the lumbar region: a radioanatomical perspective in spines with L5–S1 transitions. J Neurosurg Spine 15:371–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLain FR, Yerby SA, Moseley TA (2001) Comparative morphometry of V4 vertebrae. Spine 27:200–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitra SR, Datir SP, Jadhav SO (2002) Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation volume. Spine 27:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mughir AM, Yusof MI, Abdullah S, Ahmad S (2010) Morphological comparison between adolescent and adult lumbar pedicles using computerized tomography scanning. Surg Radiol Anat 32:587–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noijri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y (2005) Morphometric analysis of the thoracic and lumbar spine in Japanese on the use of pedicle screws. Surg Radiol Anat 27:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertel MF, Hobart J, Stein M, Schreiber V, Scharbrodt W (2011) Clinical and methodological precision of spine navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O–arm imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 14:532–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsewski JM, Simmons EH, Kallen FC, Mendel FC, Severin CM, Berens DL (1990) Morphometry of the lumbar spine: anatomical perspectives related to transpedicular fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:541–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Panjabi MM, Goel V, Oxland T, Takata K, Duranceau J, Krag M, Price M (1992) Human lumbar vertebrae quantitative tree–dimensional anatomy. Spine 17:299–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastuszak Ż, Stępień A, Tomczykiewicz K, Piusińska–Macoch R, Kordowska J, Galbarczyk D, Świstak J (2017) Limbic encephalitis – a report of four cases. Cen Eur J Immunol 42(2):213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phan K, Hogan J, Maharaj M, Mobbs R (2015) Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a review of published reports. Ortop Surg 7:213–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sponseller PD, Takenaga RK, Newton P, Boachie O, Flynn J, Letko L, Betz R, Bridwell K, Gupta M, Marks M, Bastrom T (2008) The use of traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity. Spine 33:2305–2309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannoury T, Crowl AC, Battaglia TC, Chan DP, Anderson DG (2005) An anatomical study comparing standard fluoroscopy and virtual fluoroscopy for the placement of C1–2 transarticular screws. J Neurosurg Spine 2:584–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villavicencio AT, Serxner BJ, Mason A, Nelson EL, Rajpal S, Feas N, Burneikiene S (2015) Unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: radiographic and clinical analysis. Word Neurosurg 83:553–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf A, Shoham M, Shnider M, Roffman M (2001) Morphometric study of the human lumbar spine for operation–workspace specifications. Spine 26:2472–2477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yee A, Adjei N, Do J, Ford M, Finkelstein J (2008) Do patient expectations of spinal surgery relate to functional outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:1154–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Dornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, Thomas JC, Rothman SL, Fields BT (1987) Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 12:160–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urszula Demkow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dzierżanowski, J. et al. (2019). Morphometric Analysis of the Lumbar Vertebrae Concerning the Optimal Screw Selection for Transpedicular Stabilization. In: Pokorski, M. (eds) Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology(), vol 1133. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/5584_2018_324

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics