Abstract
Although surgical treatment of poor-grade patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms is still challenging, it is well known that some patients become independent after surgical intervention. Controversy is how to select patients with factors predictive of favorable outcome. The purpose of this paper is to extract factors predictive of favorable or poor outcome from analysis of our treatment results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Haley EC, Kassell NF, Torner JC, et al (1992) The international cooperative study on the timing of aneurysm surgery. The north American experience. Stroke 23:205–214
Kobayashi N, Kamiyama H, Tanikawa R, et al (1996) Treatment and results in poor-grade aneurysm patients. Surg Cereb Stroke 24:101–106
Suzuki M, Otawara Y, Doi, M, et al (2000) Neurological grades of patients with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage improve after short-term pretreatment. Neurosurgery 47:1098–1105
Sato M, Kodama N, Sasaki T, et al (2000) Analysis of patients with grade up of Hunt and Kosnik grade IV, V in the acute stage. Surg Cereb Stroke 28:371–374
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Tokyo
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sasaki, T., Nakagawara, J., Osato, T., Hayase, K., Takeda, R., Nakamura, H. (2006). Treatment Results of Poor-grade (WFNS Grade V) Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. In: Kanno, T., Kato, Y. (eds) Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery and Multidisciplinary Neurotraumatology. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-28576-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-28576-8_26
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-28551-9
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-28576-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)