Advertisement

Creation Theory of Cognition: Is Memory Retrieved or Created?

  • Takafumi Terasawa

Summary

It could logically be proposed that all of the symbolic responses that we make are “created” from stored serial impulse patterns, that we do not require any symbols or rules in our memory representations, and that memory and perception are based on the same processes. The simulations in this chapter indicate that a very simple algorithm can create a symbolic pattern from non-symbolic patterns without any symbols or any encoding rules in memory. The success of the simulation indicates the potentialities of the creation theory of cognition that regards the creation of symbolic information from the interaction between a vast store of non-symbolic information and the externally input non-symbolic information as “cognition.”

Key words

Recognition memory pattern recognition cross-inhibitory processes inhibition memory representation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974a). A propositional theory of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 2, 406–412.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1974b). Interference in memory for multiple contexts. Memory & Cognition, 2, 509–514.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, S., & Gronlund, S. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37–60.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1970). Facilitation of retrieval from semantic memory: The effect of repeating part of an inference. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention and performance III (pp. 304–314). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  9. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 621–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eich, J. M. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. Psychological Review, 92, 1–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gregg, V. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 183–216). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Hintzman, D. L. (1976). Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 10 (pp. 47–91). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hintzman, D. L. (1982). Are presentation frequency and spatial numerosity distinct attributes of memory? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 196–198.Google Scholar
  16. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96–101.Google Scholar
  17. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hintzman, D. L., & Block, R. A. (1971). Repetition and memory: Evidence for a multiple-trace hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hintzman, D. L., Nozawa, G., & Irmscher, M. (1982). Frequency as a nonpropositional attribute of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hintzman, D.L., & Stern, L. D. (1978). Contextual variability and memory for frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCloskey, M., & Cohen, N. J. (1989). Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 24 (pp. 109–165). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Quillian, M. R. (1969). The teachable language comprehender: A simulation program and theory of language. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 12, 459–476.Google Scholar
  26. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Models for recall and recognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 205–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ratcliff, R. (1990). Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review, 97, 285–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Terasawa, T. (1994) Inhibitory mechanism in recognition memory. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tsukuba. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  30. Terasawa, T. (1996). Nonlinearity of interference in recognition memory for multiple contexts. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 67, 141–146. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  31. Terasawa, T. (1997). Mechanism of recognition and permanence of memory. Tokyo: Kazama-shobo. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  32. Terasawa, T. (2002). Memory and consciousness. In T. Mori (Ed.), Interesting memory laboratories. Kyoto: Kitaohji-shobo. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  33. Terasawa, T. (2003) Data storing CAI system that enables lifetime individual learning: Developing a module on the basis of data from long-term learning experiments and human memory theory to estimate learner’s exam results. Report for the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B)(2), Japan.Google Scholar
  34. Tsukahara, T., & Terasawa, T. (1997). Characteristics of MINERVA2 and its installation on a computer. Proceedings of the 14th annual meeting of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (pp. 64–65). Japanese Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  35. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takafumi Terasawa
    • 1
  1. 1.Okayama UniversityJapan

Personalised recommendations