Summary
We review evidence on the use of one type of memory in visual search over time. Visual search benefits when observers are given a preview of distractors that remain throughout a subsequent search display. Studies examining negative carry-over effects and visual probe detection suggest that the ‘preview benefit’ is based at least in part on the inhibition of old groups of stimuli. However, the presence of luminance onsets defining the new search display are not necessary to produce the benefit, since, under appropriate conditions, a benefit can occur when the new stimuli do not have unique luminance onsets. Studies using functional brain imaging suggest that the inhibition of old groups of stimuli is modulated by the superior parietal lobe, whereas the detection of salient new targets is associated with activation in the temporo-parietal junction. Dynamic inhibition of memory representations of old stimuli provides a means of prioritizing attention to new events.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 213–237.
Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press). Effects of color on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for color. Spatial Vision: Special issue, The Role of Attention in Visual Search.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W. & Hodsoll, J. (2003). Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carry-over effects in preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 758–778.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J. (in press). Probing distractor inhibition in preview search: Direct evidence form a luminance-probe technique. Perception & Psychophysics.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Watson, D.G. (in preparation). Visual marking at isoluminance.
Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Hulleman, J. (2004). Revisiting preview search benefits at isoluminance: Evidence from preview search of static items. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G.L. (2002). Control of goal directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Coull, J. T., & Nobre, A. C. (1988). Where and when to pay attention: The neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 7426–7435.
Danziger, S., Kingstone, A., & Snyder, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1467–1475.
DeSchepper, B., & Treisman, A. (1996). Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 27–47.
Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 93, 891–900.
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G.W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively define targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32–39.
Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 640–660.
Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575–577.
Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10, 257–298.
Humphreys, G. W., Jung-Stalmann, B., & Olivers, C. N. L. (in press a). An analysis of the time course of visual marking using a probe dot procedure. Perception & Psychophysics.
Humphreys, G. W., Kyllinsbæk, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (in press b). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioral and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. E., (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717–730.
Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., & van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1995). Search for a conjunctively defined target can be selectively limited to a color defined subset of elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1053–1069.
Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430–431.
Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138–147.
Kunar, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). What is ‘marked’ in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 982–996.
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740–749.
Nobre, A. C. (2001). Orienting attention to instants in time. Neuropsychologia, 39, 1317–1328.
Olivers, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down limited capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 22–42.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphresy, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertribal contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 650–657.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (in press). Spatio-temporal segregation in visual search: Evidence from parietal lesions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G. W., & Braithwaite, J. J. (in press). Feature-based inhibitory carry-over effects from old to new: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition: Special issue on visual search.
Olivers, C. N. L., Humphreys, G. W., & Heinke, D. (2002). Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 540–560.
Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Humphreys, G. W., Olivers, C. N. L., Műller, K., Lohmann, G., Wiggins, C. J., & Watson, D. G. (2003). Separating segmentation and target detection in posterior parietal cortex—an event-related fMRI study of visual marking. NeuroImage, 18, 310–323.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of performance. In H. Bouma & D. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and Performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Walker, J. A., Friedrich, F. J., & Rafal, R. D. (1984). Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention. The Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 1863–1874.
Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.
Simons, D. J. (2000). Current approaches to change blindness. Visual Cognition, 7, 1–15.
Takeda, Y., & Kumada, T. (2004). Pattern-based visual marking: Evidence for a grouped pattern representation of old items. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606.
Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, F. (1998). Attentional control within 3-D space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1476–1485.
Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571–590.
Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 321–344.
Treisman, A., & Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459–478.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994). “What” and “where” in the human brain. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 4, 157–165.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior, (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritising selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122.
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471–481.
Yantis, S., & Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 601–621.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Tokyo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Humphreys, G.W., Braithwaite, J., Olivers, C.N.L., Watson, D.G. (2005). Dynamic Uses of Memory in Visual Search Over Time and Space. In: Ohta, N., MacLeod, C.M., Uttl, B. (eds) Dynamic Cognitive Processes. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27431-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-27431-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-23999-4
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-27431-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)