Advertisement

Conscious and Unconscious Processes in Hypermnesia

  • Hajime Otani
  • Koichi Kato
  • Robert L. WidnerJr.

Summary

Memory performance changes as a function of repeated testing even when we are not re-exposed to the to-be-remembered material between tests. Our research has focused on whether recovery of previously unretrieved items on a subsequent test—referred to as reminiscence—is based on conscious or unconscious processes. There is ample evidence indicating that reminiscence requires active searches of memory (i.e., conscious process). However, subjective experiences suggest that previously unretrieved items sometime pop into mind without an active search of memory (i.e., unconscious process). In line with this hypothesis, studies have shown that (1) tip-of-the-tongue experiences are often resolved when the sought-after information pops into mind; (2) participants often have no knowledge of items prior to recovering these items; and (3) unlike recall, older adults show similar levels of reminiscence as do young adults. However, when one compares data from explicit and implicit memory tests, the explicit test produces greater amounts of reminiscence than the implicit test, even though reminiscence is also present in the implicit memory test. Based on these results, we suggest that there are two types of reminiscence, voluntary and involuntary; the former requires conscious retrieval whereas the latter does not. The existence of these two types of reminiscence suggests that when retrieval attempts for sought-after information are repeated, memory performance is determined by the dynamic interplay between conscious and unconscious processes.

Key words

Repeated testing reminiscence hypermnesia automatic processing voluntary and involuntary reminiscence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballard, P. B. (1913). Oblivescence and reminiscence. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, 1, 1–82.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, D. M., MacKay, D. G., Worthley, J. S., & Wade, E. (1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 542–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erdelyi, M. H. (1996). The recovery of unconscious memories: Hypermnesia and reminiscence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not for words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erdelyi, M. H., Finkelstein, S., Herrell, N., Miller, B., & Thomas, J. (1976). Coding modality vs. input modality in hypermnesia: Is a rose a rose a rose? Cognition, 4, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erdelyi, M. H., & Stein, J. B. (1981). Recognition hypermnesia: The growth of recognition memory (d’) over time with repeated testing. Cognition, 9, 23–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groninger, L. D., & Murray, K. N. (2004). Reminiscence, forgetting, hypermnesia using face-name learning: Isolating the effects using recall and recognition memory measures. Memory, 12, 351–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, M. A. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maki, P. M., Zonderman, A. B., & Weingartner, H. (1999). Age differences in implicit memory: Fragmented object identification and category exemplar generation. Psychology & Aging, 14, 284–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mandler, G. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering without really trying. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. McDaniel, M. A., Moore, B. A., & Whiteman, H. L. (1998). Dynamic changes in hypermnesia across early and late tests: A relational/item-specific account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Otani, H., & Hodge, M. H. (1991). Does hypermnesia occur in recognition and cued recall? American Journal of Psychology, 104, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Otani, H., Kato, K., Widner, R. L. Jr., Goernert, P. N., Shapovalova, O. G., & VonGlahn, N. R. (2003). Reminiscence in explicit and implicit memories. Unpublished manuscript, Central Michigan University.Google Scholar
  16. Otani, H., & Stimson, M. J. (1994). A further attempt to demonstrate hypermnesia in recognition. Psychological Record, 44, 25–34.Google Scholar
  17. Otani, H., & Whiteman, H. L. (1994). Cued recall hypermnesia is not an artifact of response bias. American Journal of Psychology, 107, 401–421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Otani, H., Widner, R. L. Jr., Goernert, P. N., Hancock, T. H., Crooks, C., Barrons, V. M., & Choi, H. (2002). Investigating memory recovery using a repeated testing paradigm: Do participants know which previously unrecalled items are recoverable? Unpublished manuscript, Central Michigan University.Google Scholar
  19. Otani, H., Widner, R. L., Jr., & Kato, K. (2001, April). An attempt to demonstrate hypermnesia using an associative recognition test. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southern Society for Philosophy and Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  20. Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia in reminiscence and recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne, D. G., Hembrooke, H. A., & Anastasi, J. S. (1993). Hypermnesia in free and cued recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 48–62.Google Scholar
  22. Payne, D. G., & Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Hypermnesia occurs in recall but not in recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 100, 145–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Roediger, H. L., III, & Challis, B. H. (1989). Hypermnesia: Improvements in recall with repeated testing. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on cognition (pp. 175–199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Roediger, H. L., III, & Payne, D. G. (1985). Recall criterion does not affect recall level or hypermnesia: A puzzle for generate/recognize theories. Memory & Cognition, 13, 1–7.Google Scholar
  27. Schwartz, B. L. (2002). Tip-of-the-tongue states: Phenomenology, mechanism, and lexical retrieval. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Toth, J. P. (2000). Nonconscious forms of human memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 245–261). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Widner, R. L., Jr., Otani, H., & Smith, A. (2000). Hypermnesia: Differences between young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 28, 556–564.Google Scholar
  30. Widner, R. L., Jr., & Smith, S. M. (1996). Feeling-of-knowing judgments from the subject’s perspective. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 373–387.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yaniv, I., & Meyer, D. E. (1987). Activation and metacognition of inaccessible stored information: Potential bases for incubation effects in problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hajime Otani
    • 1
  • Koichi Kato
    • 1
  • Robert L. WidnerJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Michigan UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Minnesota State UniversityMankatoUSA

Personalised recommendations