Advertisement

Grounded Theory and Multi-Agent Simulation for a Small Firm

  • Clinton J. Andrews
  • Ana I. Baptista
  • Shawn L. W. Patton
Part of the Agent-Based Social Systems book series (ABSS, volume 1)

Summary

There is a problematic disconnection in much research on organizational behavior between empirical evidence, mostly from case studies, and theorizing, most of which has been discursive rather than formal. This paper presents an empirically based, bottom-up view of organizational behavior, obtained by performing case studies of small firms in the New Jersey plastic injection molding industry, and then developing a multi-agent simulation model of such a firm. The model embodies a formal, explicit, and grounded (limited) theory of organizational behavior. Results suggest that a realistic account of corporate behavior depends in part on representing employees not as homo economicus but as agents having bounded rationality and subject to social influences.

Key words

Multi-agent simulation grounded theory organizational behavior plastics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Project website with case study and model details and is at http://policy.rutgers.edu/andrews/projects/abm.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, C.J. (2002) Humble Analysis, Praeger, Westport, CT.Google Scholar
  3. Babbie, E. (2003) The Practice of Social Research, 10th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) “Building theories from case study research,” Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glaser, B.G. (1992) Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing, Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Glaser, B.G., and A.L. Strauss (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Lofland, J., and L.H. Lofland (1995) Analyzing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Popper, K.R. (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 3rd ed. rev., Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
  9. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for developing Grounded Theory, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
  10. Tukey, J.W. (1970) Exploratory Data Analysis, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Wallace, W. (1971) The Logic of Science in Sociology, Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Yin, R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 44–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clinton J. Andrews
    • 1
  • Ana I. Baptista
    • 1
  • Shawn L. W. Patton
    • 1
  1. 1.Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public PolicyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations