Advertisement

Continental shelf waves in the presence of a sheared geostrophic current

  • W. D. McKee
Part VI — Long Period Barotropic Waves
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 64)

Abstract

When the effects of a sheared geostrophic current are included, continental shelf waves are modified but retain their essential character, although the direction of phase propagation may be changed by a strong adverse current.However, there is also a continuous spectrnun of modes whose phase speeds lie in the range of the current.These modes have finite amplitudes everywhere,but singular derivatives at the so-called critical layer where the phase speed of the mode equals the speed of the current.The influence of these modes may be studied by methods used in hydrodynamic stability theory.If the phase speeds of any of the free wave modes or the phase speed of the travelling wind stress pattern should lie in the range of the current, the inviscid theory predicts discontinuous velocity occcponents parallel to the coast at the critical layer. In practice, these would be limited by friction,but we should still expect large shears at these regions.

Keywords

Potential Vorticity Phase Speed Critical Layer Free Wave Rayleigh Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, J.K., and V.T. Buchwald, 1969. J. Fluid Mech.35:815–826.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brooks, D.A., 1975. Ph.D. Thesis; Miami.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Buchwald, V.T., and J.K. Adams, 1968. Proc. Ray. Soc. Lond. A305: 235–250.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Case, K.M., 1960. Phys. Fluids. 3: 143–148.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cutchin, D.L., and R.L. Smith, 1973. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 3: 73–82.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dikii, L.A., 1960. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR. 135: 1068–1071.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gill, A.E., and E.H. Schumann, 1974. J. Phys. Oceanogr.4:83–90.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Godfrey, J.S. 1973. Deep-Sea Res. 20: 1059–1076.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamon, B.V., 1962. J. Geophys. Res. 67: 5147–5155. (Corrected in 1963. J. Geophys. Res. 68: 4635.)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamon, B.V., 1966. J. Geophys. Res. 71: 2883–2893.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mooers, C.N.K., and R.L. Smith, 1968. J. Geophys. Res. 74:549–557.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mysak, L.A., and B.V. Hamon, 1969. J. Geophys. Res. 74:1397–1405.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niiler, P.P., and L.A. Mysak, 1971. Geophys. Fluid. Dynam.2: 273–288.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rayleigh, J.W.S., 1896. The Theory of Sound. Vol.II. Second Edit., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Robinson, A.R., 1964. J. Geophys. Res. 69: 367–368.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. D. McKee
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MathematicsUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations