Abstract
This paper sets out a theoretical model to analyse the effect of UK’s climate change levy (CCL) and the emissions trading scheme (ETS) on the productivity and overall economic efficiency of businesses. A microeconomic analysis at plant level enables us to understand the implications of compliance cost for the overall cost structure of the plant. Some of the dynamics of an economic instrument can be lost at an aggregate level. We will use a stochastic translog frontier cost function with a cost inefficiency component to analyse whether the two instruments affect the overall economic efficiency of the firm. The model allows for factor substitution to take into account changes in relative factor prices, which can reduce the perceived adverse effects of the two instruments on productivity and efficiency of plants. The paper also briefly outlines the implications for the cost function due to some of the key developments since their inception in 2001 (CCL) and 2002 (ETS).
This paper is part of an on going part-time PhD research at the University of Hull, UK. The author is currently working as an Economist with the Greater London Authority.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barbera AJ, McConnell VD (1990) ‘The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industry Productivity: Direct and Indirect Effects’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 18: 50–65
Battese GE, Coelli T (1995) ‘A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data’, Empirical Economics 20: 325–332
Business data linking (BDL) (April 2002) An introduction by Matthew Barnes and Ralf Martin, Economic Trends 581 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/articles/economic_trends/business_data_linking.pdf
Coelli T (1996) A Guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Function Estimation, Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (CEPA) Working Paper, 96/07
Coelli T, Prasada Rao D S, Battese G E (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
DeBoo AJ (1993) ‘The Costs of Integrated Environmental Control’, Statistical Journal of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe 10(1): 47–64
DeBoo AJ (1995) ‘Accounting for Costs of Clean Technologies and Products’. In: Second Meeting of the London Group on Natural Resource and Environmental Accounting: Conference papers, (ed) London Group on Natural Resource and Environmental Accounting, pp. 125–143, Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis
DEFRA (2001) UK Climate Change Agreements and the Climate Change Levy http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ccl/index.htm
DEFRA (October 2002) The UK Emissions Trading Scheme-Auction Analysis and Progress Report.
DEFRA (2003) UK Emission Trading Scheme, http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climate change/trading/reia.htm
ENVIROS Consulting Ltd. (2003) A Qualitative Study of the Direct Entry
UK Emissions Trading Scheme. A report prepared by the Climate Change Policy and Strategy Group of Enviros Consulting based on the MSc research carried out by Katharina Kröger at the University of Nottingham
ETSU AEA (2001) Climate change agreements — Sectoral energy efficiency targets http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ccl/pdf/etsu-analysis.pdf
Future Energy Solutions (FES) (2003) Climate Change Agreements-Results of the first target period assessment, Version 1.1-Preliminary Results http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/ccl/pdf/cca_tp1_prelim.pdf
Grubb M, Vrolijk C, Brack D (1999), The Kyoto Protocol: A Guide and Assessment. The Royal Institute of International Affairs, London UK
Hahn R, Roger N (1982) ‘Designing a Market for Tradeable Emission Permits’. In: Magat, Wesley (ed) Reform of Environmental Regulation, Ballinger, Cambridge, pp. 119–146
Harris RID (1999) Productive efficiency in UK manufacturing 1974–1994: Estimates of five leading sectors, University of Portsmouth.
Hjollund L, Svendsen GT (2001) ‘Why Green Taxation?’ Energy and Environment 12(1): 29–38
OECD (1993) Taxation and the Environment: Complementary Policies, OECD, Paris.
Office of National Statistics, Annual Abstract of Statistics publication, (2003), http://www.statistics.gov.uk/downloads/theme_compendia/Aa2003/Annual_Abstract_2003.pdf
O’Mahony M (1999) ‘Britain’s productivity performance 1950–1996: An International Perspective, London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research
Pearce D (July 1991) ‘The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming’. The Economic Journal 101(407): 938–948
Pigou A (1920) The Economics of Welfare. London: MacMillan
Porter ME, van der Linde C (1995) ‘Toward a New Conception of the Environment-competitiveness relationship’. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 97–118
Varma A (2000) The UK’s Climate Change Levy: Competitiveness and Environmental impacts in the Humber and Yorkshire region. Dissertation submitted for the Degree of MSc (Econ) Public Policy, The University of Hull
Varma A (2003) ‘The UK’s climate change levy: cost effectiveness, competitiveness and environmental impacts’, Energy Policy 31: 51–61
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Varma, A. (2006). UK’s climate change levy and emissions trading scheme: implications for businesses’ productivity and economic efficiency. In: Antes, R., Hansjürgens, B., Letmathe, P. (eds) Emissions Trading and Business. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1748-1_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1748-1_21
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1747-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1748-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)