Skip to main content

A Quadratic Method for Evaluating the New Hungarian Act on Electronic Communications with Respect to the Policy and Regulatory Objectives

  • Chapter
Book cover Governance of Communication Networks

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

  • 547 Accesses

Abstract

Hungary transposed the new EU regulatory framework package on electronic communications in 2003. It was approved by the Hungarian Parliament in November 2003, entered into force on 1 January 2004 (except a few paragraphs). The new EU directives created an integrated regulatory system for the telecommunications, broadcasting and cable tv-distribution by introducing new terminology built on the collective term electronic communications but not including postal services. Thus, the former Act on Communications, more or less complied with the regulatory framework of 1998, was replaced by two new Acts: the Act on Electronic Communications (Eht) and the Act on the Postal Services.

In the course of expressing opinion on the draft bill and the final text of Eht we have not only evaluated it article by article (this was done by a wide circle of commenting operators and state administration bodies) but we also examined the prospected fulfilment of electronic communications policy and regulatory objectives. We took the objectives in the general framework directive (Article 8) for basis and completed them for handling national particularities. In this way a wellbalanced set of 20 objectives arranged into four groups has been identified.

A two-dimensional evaluation method has been elaborated (basic idea derives from the Gartner’s Magic Quadrant method used for the evaluation of companies on a defined market) that systematically analysis and scores the suitability and the feasibility of the legal solutions applied to the objectives by points ranging between 1 and 10. The evaluation is carried out by experts for each objective using the scoring criteria defined for both suitability and feasibility aspects.

The pairs of scores for the objectives are represented on a 10 by 10 square. The square is divided into harmonic, pragmatic, theoretic and partial quadrants depending on the high or low scoring of the suitability and feasibility. In addition, the domains of the five quality grades of the solutions are also determined. Various mean, deviation, and correlation statistics are calculated, so that a quantitative evaluation and well-based conclusions can be drawn. The procedure, referred to as quadratic evaluation method, can be generally used for evaluating legal, policy or strategic documents, where the clarity and completeness of the concept (suitability) and the abilities to the implementation of the concept (feasibility) are equally important. Here we apply it for the evaluation of the Eht with respect to the 20 policy objectives and the legal and regulatory tools provided for the national regulatory authority in Hungary (NHH).

The paper presents the policy and regulatory objectives identified, the quadratic evaluation method used and the results of scoring for the public draft and the final version of Eht.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • European Commission (1987) Green Paper on the Development of the common market for telecommunication services and equipment. COM 290 final, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1997) Green Paper on the Convergence of the telecommunications, media and information technology sectors, and the implications for regulation. Towards an Information Society approach. COM 623, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) Communication from the Commission: Towards a new framework for electronic communications infrastructure and associated services. (Communications Review) COM 539, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan MH (ed) (2003) The EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communications and related EU Legislation. Handbook. Arnold & Porter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • European Communities (2002) Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive). Official Journal L 108, 24 April, pp 33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragos N (2003) Gartner Methodology. Gartner Symposium on Application Integration and Web Services, Rome, 16 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Informatics and Communications (IHM), Ministry of Justice (IM) (2003) Bill of the Act on Electronic Communications. July. 004735/2003, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Hungarian Parliament (2003) Act No. 100 on Electronic Communications. Budapest, 24 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallai G (2003) The quadratic evaluation of the Act on Electronic Communications. Report (in Hungarian), Budapest, p 43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sallai, G. (2006). A Quadratic Method for Evaluating the New Hungarian Act on Electronic Communications with Respect to the Policy and Regulatory Objectives. In: Preissl, B., Müller, J. (eds) Governance of Communication Networks. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1746-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics