Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 996 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Behavioural Economics lacks an agreed definition, but a good example is provided by Mullainathan and Thaler (2000: 1): “the combination of psychology and economics that investigates what happens in markets in which some of the agents display human limitations and complications.” Natural Decision Making involves experienced decision makers in field settings where decisions are not routine. These are investors and managers, airline pilots and fire chiefs whose decisions involve a struggle with complexity, lack of data and poorly known risks. Their decisions have urgency, immediacy and serious consequences. According to Meso et al. (2002: 64) natural decision making is “how people use their experience to make decisions in complex, dynamic real-time environments.”

    Google Scholar 

  2. A still tentative alternative view comes from Berg (2003: 412) who argues that “major themes in behavioural economics... now fit comfortably into most major journals in economics... [although] it has not been accompanied by a new normative framework for analysing policy.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. There is a longstanding association between finance and biology. Malthus (1798, reprinted 1973) linked the biology of population growth to the economics of natural resource supply; Schumpeter (1939) adopted a Darwinian view of business cycles with his description of capitalist development as an evolutionary process incorporating natural selection and punctuated equilibria. Nelson and Winter (1982) arguably popularised the modern association between evolution and economics, and encouraged Hodgson (1995) to collect 30 key papers charting the post-1950 emergence of biological analogies in economics.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2006). Introduction. In: Why Managers and Companies Take Risks. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1696-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics