Skip to main content

Three-Class Sampling Plans: A Review with Applications

  • Chapter
Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 8
  • 1378 Accesses

Summary

Acceptance sampling plans have been widely used in statistical quality control for several decades. The vast majority of the relevant research and development over this period has focused on two-class sampling plans that involve classifying product characteristics as either conforming or nonconforming with respect to specified acceptance requirements. In recent years, some developmental work has occurred with respect to three-class sampling plans that additionally involve classifying product characteristics as marginally conforming with respect to requirements. This work remains relatively unknown among practitioners and applications seem to be presently limited to control of undesirable microbiological presence in food. This paper presents a review of the key developmental contributions to three-class sampling plan theory and discusses some applications where such plans would provide a more effective means of quality control. Applications specific to the field of legal metrology, including case-studies where isolated lots are common and currently-used methods are problematic, are particularly examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmed, F.E., Ed. (1991). Seafood Safety. National Academy Press, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baillie, D.H. (1987). Multivariate acceptance sampling. In: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 3, Lenz, H.J. et al., Eds., Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 83–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bebbington, M., Govindaraju, K., DeSilva, N., and Volz, R. (2000). Acceptance sampling and practical issues in procurement inspection of apples. ASA Proceedings of the Section on Quality and Productivity, 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bray, D.F., Lyon, D.A., and Burr, I.W. (1973). Three Class Attributes Plans in Acceptance Sampling. Technometrics, Vol. 15, No. 3, 575–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, P.A. (1984). A Three-Class Procedure for Acceptance Sampling by Variables. Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, University of Guelph, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cassady, C.R. and Nachlas, J.A. (2003). Evaluating and Implementing 3-Level Acceptance Sampling Plans. Quality Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 3, 361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clements, J.A. (1979). Three-Class Attribute Sampling Plans. ASQC Technical Conference Transactions-Houston, 264–269.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clements, J.A. (1980). Three-Class Sampling Plans-Continued. ASQC Technical Conference Transactions-Atlanta, 475–482.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clements, J.A. (1983). Trinomial Sampling Plans to Match MIL-STD-105D. ASQC Quality Congress Transactions — Boston, 256–264.

    Google Scholar 

  10. v. Collani, E. and Schmidt, R. (1988). Economic Attribute Sampling in the Case of Three Possible Decisions. Technical Report of the Würzburg Research Group on Quality Control, No. 13, September.

    Google Scholar 

  11. v. Collani, E. (1990). ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 versus ANSI/ASQC Z1.9. Economic Quality Control, Vol. 5, No. 2, 60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. v. Collani, E. (1991). A Note on Acceptance Sampling for Variables. Metrika, Vol. 38, 19–36.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. v. Collani, E. (1992). The Pitfall of Acceptance Sampling by Variables. In: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 4, Lenz, H.J. et al., Eds., Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Göb, R. (1996). An Elementary Model of Statistical Lot Inspection and its Application to Sampling by Variables. Metrika, Vol. 44, 135–163.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Göb, R. (1996). Tests of Significance for the Mean of a Finite Lot. Metrika, Vol. 44, 223–238.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Göb, R. (2001). Methodological Foundations of Statistical Lot Inspection. In: Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 6, Lenz, H.J. and Wilrich, P.-Th., Eds, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hryniewicz, O. (1991). A Note on E. v. Collani’s Paper “ANSI/ASQC Z1.4 versus ANSI/ASQC Z1.9”. Economic Quality Control, Vol. 6, No. 1, 16–18

    Google Scholar 

  18. ICMSF (1986). Sampling for microbiological analysis: principles and specific applications, 2nd ed. Microorganisms in Foods, book 2. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Organization for Standardization (1999). ISO 2859-1:1999. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes-Part 1: Sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limit (AQL) for lot-by-lot inspection. ISO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Organization for Standardization (1985). ISO 2859-2:1985. Sampling procedures for inspection by attributes — Part 2: Sampling plans indexed by limiting quality (LQ) for isolated lot inspection. ISO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  21. International Organization of Legal Metrology (2002). OIML R 87 Net Quantity of Product in Prepackages, 3rd Committee Draft Revision. OIML, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Newcombe, P.A. and Allen, O.B. (1988). A Three-Class Procedure for Acceptance Sampling by Variables. Technometrics, Vol. 30, No. 4, 415–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Owen, D.B. (1965). A Special Case of the Bivariate Non-Central t-Distribution. Biometrika, Vol. 52, 437–446.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Randies, R.H. (2001). On Neutral Responses (Zeros) in the Sign Test and Ties in the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test. The American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 2, 96–101.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Schilling, E.G. (1982). Acceptance Sampling in Quality Control. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shah, D.K. and Phatak, A.G. (1977). The Maximum Likelihood Estimation Under Curtailed Three Class Attributes Plans. Technometrics, Vol. 19, No. 2, 159–166.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Shah, D.K. and Phatak, A.G. (1978). The maximum likelihood estimation under multiple three class attributes plan-Curtailed as well as uncurtailed, Metron, 36, 99–118.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, H.R., Sankar, G., and Chatterjee, T.K. (1991). Procedures and tables for construction and selection of three class attributes sampling plans, (STMA V33 1597) IAPQR Transactions, Journal of the Indian Association for Productivity, Quality & Reliability, 16, 19–22.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. U.S. Department of Defense (1957). MIL-STD-414: Military Standard: Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Variables for Percent Defective. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  30. U.S. Department of Defense (1963). MIL-STD-105D: Military Standard: Sampling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Palcat, F.A. (2006). Three-Class Sampling Plans: A Review with Applications. In: Lenz, HJ., Wilrich, PT. (eds) Frontiers in Statistical Quality Control 8. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1687-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics