Skip to main content

Using Case Study Methods in Researching Supply Chains

  • Chapter

Summary

This article aims to contribute to a better understanding of the use of case-based methodologies when researching supply chains. We first draw on Stuart et al. (2002) as well as other researchers in the operations management (OM) field and pioneering authors (Eisenhardt, 1989; Yin, 1993; Miles & Huberman, 1994) to examine the process of conducting case based research. We proceed from its theoretical foundations to the eventual dissemination of the research findings. We also examine how six other researchers have dealt with each stage of the research process as part of their case studies within supply chains. Finally, we illustrate this by presenting the critical decisions made in our research on supply relationships (inter- and intra- firm) and the key pitfalls we encountered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5 References

  • Choi, T., Huong, Y. (2002): Unveiling the structure of supply networks: Case studies of Honda, Acura, and Daimler Chrysler, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 469–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigolini, R., Cozzi, M., Perona, M. (2004): A new framework for supply chain management: Conceptual model and empirical test, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 24(1): 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croom, S., Romano, P., Giannakis, M.. (2000): Supply Chain Management: An Analytical Framework for Critical Literature Review, in: European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6(1): 67–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989): Building Theories from Case Study Research, in: Academy of Management Review, 14(5): 532–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guide Jr., V. D. R., Jayaraman, V., Linton, J. (2003): Building contingency planning for closed-looped supply chains with product recovery, in: Journal of Operations Management, 21: 259–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harland, C. M. (1996): Supply chain management: relationships, chains and networks, in: British Journal of Management, 7 (Special Issue): S63–S80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä, J. (2002): From supply to demand chain management: efficiency and customer satisfaction, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 747–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. (1979): Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action, in: Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 602–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, D., Meredith, J. (1993): Conducting case study reserch in Operations Management, in: Journal of Operations Management, 11: 239–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, J. (1998): Building Operations Management theory through case and field research, in: Journal of Operations Management, 16: 441–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Huberman, A. (1994): Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M. (2004): Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics, in: Journal of Operations Management, 22:459–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (1990): Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice, in: Organization Science, 1(3): 267–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtuséannatham, M. (2002): Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 549–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, I., McCutcheon, D., Handfield, R., McLachlin, R., Samson, D. (2002): Effective Case Research in Operations Management: A Process Perspective, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 419–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N., Frohlich, M. (2002): Case research in Operations Management, in: International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 22(2):195–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., Maull, R., Ellis, B. (2002): Demand chain management theory constraints development from global aerospace supply webs, in: Journal of Operations Management, 20: 691–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994): Case study research: design and methods, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koulikoff-Souviron, M., Harrison, A. (2005). Using Case Study Methods in Researching Supply Chains. In: Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Müller, M., Reiner, G. (eds) Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics