Skip to main content

Customers’ Perceptions of Service Quality by TPL Service Providers in the United Kingdom — A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

  • Chapter

Summary

Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), including Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) is a statistical tool that is becoming increasingly popular in logistics research. The intent of this paper is to demonstrate the application of CFA in logistics research particularly in testing Mentzer et al. (1999) Logistics Service Quality (LSQ) instrument, a scale developed in the United States. This paper displays the value of CFA for scale development and testing with particular reference to dealing with missing data. The study is based on cross-sectoral mail survey of the customers of Third Party Logistics (TPL) providers in the United Kingdom (UK). With some improvement, it demonstrates the generalizability of LSQ scale across industries in the UK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  • Anderson, J. C., Gerbing, D. W. (1982): Some Methods for Respecifying Measurement Models to Obtain Unidimensional Construct Measurement, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 19: 453–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1999): UK Top on Outsourcing, in: Supply Management, 4(14): 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1996): Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data, in: Marcoulides, G. A. and Schumacker, R. E. (Eds): Advanced Structural Equation Modeling, Mahwah, NJ: p. 243–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J., Overton, T. (1977): Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 14: 396–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. (1988): On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models, in: Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 16 (Spring): 7–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, H., Homburg, C. (1996): Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Marketing and Consumer Research: A Review, in: International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 139–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990): Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models, in: Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., Bonett, D. G. (1980): Significance Tests and Goodness-of-Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures, in: Psychological Bulletin, 88: 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., Chou, C. P. (1987): Practical Issues in Structural Modeling, in: Sociological Methods & Research, 16: 78–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, C. C., Mentzer, J. T., Bird, M. M. (1997): Measuring Physical Distribution Service Quality, in: Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1986): Sample size and Bentler and Bonett’s Non-normed Fit Index, in Psychometrika, 51: 375–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, B. M., Cudeck, R. (1993): Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit, in: Bollen, K. S., Long, J. S. (eds): Testing Structural Models, Sage Publications, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001): Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS — Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G. A., Peter, J. P. (1984): Research Design Effects on the Reliability of Rating Scales: A Meta Analysis, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 21(November): 360–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A. (1994): Incorporating Choice into an Attitudinal Framework: Analysing Models of Mental Comparison Processes, in: Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (June): 100–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillman, D. A. (2000): Mail and Internet Surveys — The Tailored Design Method, John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F., Waller, M. A. (1994): Latent Variables in Business Logistics Research, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 15(2), 145–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2001): The Impact of Nonnormality on Full Information Maximum-Likelihood Estimation for Structural Equation Models with Missing Data, in: Psychological Methods, 16(4), 352–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L., (1999): Effects of Sample Size, Estimation Methods, and Model Specification on Structural Equation Modeling Fit Indexes, in: Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981): Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., Anderson, J. C. (1988): An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment, in: Journal of Marketing Research, 25(May), 186–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Rolph, E. A., Ronald, L. T., William, C. B. (1998): Multivariate Data Analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M. (1995): Evaluating Model Fit, in Hoyle, R.H. (Ed): Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA: 76–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., Bentler, P. M. (1999): Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives, in: Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R., Vetter, D. E. (1996): An Empirical Comparison of Published Replication Research in Accounting, Economics, Finance, Management and Marketing, in: Journal of Business Research, 35: 153–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G. (1974): Analyzing Psychological Data by Structural Analysis of Covariance Matrices, in: Atkinson, R.C., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., and Suppes, P. (Eds): Contemporary Development in Mathematical Psychology II, Freeman, San Francisco: p. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, S. B., Savitskie, K, Stank, T. P., Lynch, D. F., Ellinger, A. E. (2002): A Summary and Analysis of Multi-Item Scales Used in Logistics Research, in: Journal of Business Logistics: 23(2), 83–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. M., Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1993): The Design of Replicated Studies, in: The American Statistician, 47 (August), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1998): Latent Variables Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path and Structural Analysis, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3rd Ed. Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1998): Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J. (1994): Structural Factor Analysis Experiments with Incomplete Data, in: Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29: 409–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., Kent, J. L. (1999): Developing A Logistics Service Quality Scale, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J. (1997): Validity in Logistics Research, in: Journal of Business Logistics, 18(1), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., Hult, T. M. (2001): Logistics Service Quality as a Segment-Customised Process, in: Journal of Marketing, 65 (October), 82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., Spekman, R. (1994): Characteristics of Partnership Success: Partnership Attributes, Communication Behavior and Conflict Resolution, in: Strategic Management Journal, 15: 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L., Graham, J. W. (2002): Missing Data: Our View of the State of the Art, in: Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, J. W., Fields, M. W., Tetrick, L.E., (1989): The Factor Structure of Union Commitment: An Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(April): 228–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaafar, H.S., Rafiq, M. (2005). Customers’ Perceptions of Service Quality by TPL Service Providers in the United Kingdom — A Confirmatory Factor Analysis. In: Kotzab, H., Seuring, S., Müller, M., Reiner, G. (eds) Research Methodologies in Supply Chain Management. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1636-1_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics