This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson K (2002) Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 3578
Badinger H, Breuss F, Mahlberg B (2002) Welfare Effects of the EU's Organization of the Market in Bananas. Journal of Common Market Studies 40: 515–526
Bagwell K, Staiger RW (1999) An Economic Theory of GATT. The American Economic Review 89: 215–248
Bievre, Dirk De (2002) Redesigning the Virtous Circle: Two Proposals for world Trade Organization Reform. Journal of World trade 36: 1005–1014.
Breuss F (2003) WTO Dispute Settlement in Practice — an Economic Assessment. In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds.): The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien, NewYork, pp 131–184
Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds.) (2003) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien NewYork
Bronckers MCEJ (2001) More Power to the WTO? Journal of International Economic Law 4: 41–65
Dimaranan BV, McDougall RA (eds) (2002) Global Trade, Assistance, and Production: The GTAP 5 Data Base, Purdue University
European Commission (2003), General Overview of Active WTO Dispute Settlement Cases Involving the EC as Complainant or Defendant, Brussels, Ref. 177/03, 26 March
GATT (1994) The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations: The Legal Texts, Geneva
Grossman GM, Helpman E (1995) Trade Wars and Trade Talks. Journal of Political Economy 103: 675–708
Horn H, Mavroidis PC (2001) Economic and Legal Aspects of the Most Favoured Nation Clause, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2859, London
Horn H, Mavroidis PC, Nordstrom H (1999) Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?, CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2340, London
Hungerford TL (1991) GATT: A cooperative equilibrium in a noncooperative trading regime? Journal of International Economics 31: 357–369
Johnson HG, (1953) Optimum Tariffs and Retaliation. The Review of Economic Studies, 21: 142–153; revised version in: Johnson HG, (1958) International Trade and Economic Growth: Studies in Pure Theory, George Allen & Unwin Ltd, London pp 31–55
Kennan J, Riezman R (1988) Do Big Countries Win Tariff Wars?, International Economic Review 29: 81–85
Maggi G (1999) The Role of Multilateral Institutions in International Trade Cooperation. The American Economic Review 89: 190–214
Mavroidis PC (2001) Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. In: Matsushita M, Mavroides PC, Schonbaum TJ (eds) The WTO Law and Practice, London
Mayer W (1984) Endogenous Tariff Formation. The American Economic Review 74: 970–985
McMillan J (1986) Game Theory in International Economics. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur London Paris New York
Rodrik D (1995) Political Economy of Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics Vol III, Elsevier, Amsterdam Lausanne New York Oxford Shannon Tokyo pp 1457–1494.
Spagnolo G (2001) Issue Linkage, Credible Delegation, and Policy Cooperation. CEPR Discussion Paper, No. 2778, London
Staiger RW (1995) International Rules and Institutions for Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics Vol III, Elsevier, Amsterdam Lausanne New York Oxford Shannon Tokyo, pp 1495–1551
Vranes E (2000) Principles and Emerging Problems of WTO Cross Retaliation. Europaische Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftsrecht 10: 10–15
Vranes E (2003a) From Bananas I to the 2001 Bananas Settlement: A Factual and Procedural Analysis of the WTO Proceedings. In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien New York, pp 11–37
Vranes E (2003b) Cross Retaliation under GATS and TRIPS — An Optimal Enforcement Device for Developing Countries? In: Breuss F, Griller S, Vranes E (eds) The Banana Dispute — An Economic and Legal Analysis. Springer, Wien New York pp 113–130
Whalley J (1985) Trade Liberalization among Major World Trading Areas. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London
WTO (1999a) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (USA case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/ARB, 9 April
WTO (1999b) European Communities — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (USA case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS26/ARB, 12 July
WTO (1999c) European Communities — Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (Canada case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS48/ARB, 12 July
WTO (2000) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Recourse to Arbitration by the European Communities under Article 22.6 of the DSU: Decision by the Arbitrators (Ecuador case), World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/ARB/ECU, 24 March
WTO (2001a) European Communities — Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas — Notification of Mutually Agreed Solution, World Trade Organization, WT/DS27/58, 2 My
WTO (2001b) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Commission, World Trade Organization, WT/DS108/RW, 20 August
WTO (2002) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations, Recourse to Arbitration by the United States under Article 22.6 of the DSU and Article 4.11 of the SCM Agreement: Decision of the Arbitrator, World Trade Organization, WT/DS108/ARB, 30 August
WTO (2003a) United States — Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Coroprations: Recourse by the European Communities to Article 4.10 of the SCM Agreement and Article 22.7 of the DSU, WT/DS108/26, 25 April
WTO (2003b) United States — Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R, 11 July
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breuss, F. (2005). WTO Dispute Settlement in Action: An Economic Analysis of Four EU-US Mini Trade Wars. In: Heiduk, G.S., Wong, Ky. (eds) WTO and World Trade. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_25
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1579-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1630-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)