Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Efron B, Tibshirani R (1986) Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy. Statistical Science 1(1): 54–75
Gawande K, Bandyopadhyay U (2000) Is Protection for Sale: Evidence on the Grossman-Helpman Theory of Endogenous Protection. Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 139–152
Goldberg PK, Maggi G (1999) Protection for Sale: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review 89: 1135–1155
Gould DM, Woodbridge GLW (1998) The Political Economy of Retaliation, Liberalization and Trade Wars. European Journal of Political Economy 14: 115–137
Grinols EL (1989) Procedural Protectionism: The American Trade Bill and the New Interventionist Mode. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 125: 501–521
Grinds EL Perrelli R (2002) Politics, the WTO, and Trade Disputes: Evidence from US Cases. Pacific Economic Review 7: 335–357
Jackson JH (2001) The Role and Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism. In: Dollins SM, Rodrik D (eds) Brookings Trade Forum: 2000. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 179–219
Mitra D (1999) Endogenous Lobby Formation and Endogenous Protection: A Long Run Model of Trade Policy Determination. American Economic Review 89(5): 1116–1134
Pack H (1994) Productivity or Politics: The Determinants of the Indonesian Tariff Structure. Journal of Development Economics 44: 441–451
Park YD, Eggers B (2000) WTO Dispute Settlement 1995–99: A Statistical Analysis. Journal of International Economic Law, pp 193–204
Rodrik Dani (1995) Political Economy of Trade Policy. In: Grossman GM, Rogoff K (eds) Handbook of International Economics: Vol. III. Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 1457–1496
Rose A (2002) Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?, NBER Working Paper 9273
Rose A (2002) Do WTO Members have More Liberal Trade Policy?, NBER Working Paper 9347
Sevilla CR (1998) Explaining Patterns of GATT/WTO Complaints. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Cambridge
United States Trade Representatives (2000) Section 301 Table of Cases USTR, February
World Trade Organization (2000) Overview of the State-of-Play of WTO Disputes. WTO, February
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grinds, E.L., Perrelli, R. (2005). Trade Games: Modelling WTO's Role in Trade Disputes. In: Heiduk, G.S., Wong, Ky. (eds) WTO and World Trade. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1630-2_20
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1579-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1630-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)