Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Policy Impacts on Macroeconomic Sustainability Indicators when Technical Change Is Endogenous

  • Chapter
Indicator Systems for Sustainable Innovation

Part of the book series: Sustainability and Innovation ((SUSTAINABILITY))

  • 1003 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8 References

  • Böhringer C (1999) Allgemeine Gleichgewichtsmodelle als Instrument der energie-und umweltpolitischen Analyse. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendung. Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown MA (2001) Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy 29: 1197–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buoananno P, Carraro C, Galeotti M (2003) Endogenous Induced Technical Change and the Costs of Kyoto. Resource and Energy Economics 25: 11–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carraro C (1998) Climate Modelling and Policy Strategies. The Role of Technical Change and Uncertainty. Energy Economics 20: 463–471

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • DeCanio SJ (1993) Barriers within firms to energy efficient investments. Energy Policy 21: 906–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1982) Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change. Research Policy 11: 147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1988) The nature of the innovative process. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann G (1993) Elemente einer evolutorischen Innovationstheorie. Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann G (1999) Zeitfenster beachten. Möglichkeiten der Ökologisierung der regulären Innovationstätigkeit. Ökologisches Wirtschaften 2: 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre N (1997) Barriers to energy efficiency: more than just market failure. Energy & Environment 8(1): 25–43

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • FIU (1996) Der Einfluss von Energiesteuern und-abgaben zur Reduktion von Treibhausgasen auf Innovation und technischen Fortschritt-Clearing Studie. Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum für Energiemodelle und Energiewirtschaftliche Systemanalysen in Deutschland (ed) (1999) Energiemodelle zum Klimaschutz in Deutschland. Strukturelle und gesamtwirtschaftliche Auswirkungen aus nationaler Perspektive. Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohn J, Leuchtmann U, Kräussl R (1998) Fünf makroökonometrische Modelle zur Erfassung der Wirkungen umweltpolitischer Maßnahmen-eine vergleichende Betrachtung. Band 7 der Schriftenreihe „Beiträge zu den umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnungen“. Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist S, Williams J (2000) Putty-Clay and Investment: A Business Cycle Analysis. Journal of Political Economy 108: 928–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH, Mathai K (2000) Optimal CO2 Abatement in the Presence of Induced Technological Change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39: 1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulder LH, Schneider S (1999) Induced Technological Change, Crowding Out, and the Attractiveness of CO2 Emissions Abatement. Resource and Environmental Economics 21(3–4): 211–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grupp H (1999) Umweltfreundliche Innovation durch Preissignale oder Regulation? Eine empirische Analyse für Deutschland. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 219(5+6): 611–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmelskamp J (1999) Umweltpolitik und technischer Fortschritt. Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung. Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J (1932) The Theory of Wages. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RB, Andersson B (1993) Market barriers to energy efficiency. Energy Economics 15: 262–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1994a) Energyefficiency investments and public policy. The Energy Journal 15(2): 43–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Stavins RN (1994b) The energyefficiency gap: What does it mean? Energy Policy, 22: 804–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2003) Technological Change and the Environment. In: Mäler K-G, Vincent JR (eds) Handbook of Environmental Economics vol 1. Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer P, Lehr U, Löbbe K (1999) Umweltinnovationen-Anreize und Hemmnisse. Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Löschel A (2002) Technological Change in Economic Models of Environmental Policy. A Survey. Ecological Economics 43: 105–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz C (2000) NOx Emissions and the Use of Advanced Pollution Abatement Techniques in West Germany. Economic Systems Research 12: 305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz C, Meyer B, Nathani C, Schleich J (2004) Endogenous technological change and emissions: the case of the German steel industry. Energy Policy 32, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer B, Bockermann A, Ewerhart G, Lutz C (1999) Marktkonforme Umweltpolitik. Wirkungen auf Luftschadstoffemissionen, Wachstum und Struktur der Wirtschaft. Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Modesto MA (1980) Entrepreneurs, Champions and Technological Innovation. Sloan Management Review 21(2):59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus W (1999) Modelling Induced Innovation in Climate-Change Policy. (Paper presented at the Workshop on Induced Technological Change and the Environment. IIASA, Laxenberg, Austria)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag K (2002) No-Regret Potentials in Energy Conservation: An Analysis of their Relevance, Size and Determinants. Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K (1984) Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13: 343–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Meyer B, Lutz C, Nathani C, Schön M (2002a) „Technologiewahl, technischer Fortschritt und Politiksimulationen-Ein neuer Modellierungsansatz am Beispiel der Stahlerzeugung; Zwischenbericht zum BMBF-Projekt: “Innovationen und Luftschadstoffemissionen-Eine gesamtwirtschaftliche Abschätzung des Einflusses unterschiedlicher Rahmenbedingungen bei expliziter Modellierung der Technologiewahl im Industriesektor. Karlsruhe and Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleich J, Nathani C, Ostertag K, Schön M, Walz R, Meyer B, Lutz C, Distelkamp M, Hohmann F, Wolter M-I (2000b) Innovationen und Luftschadstoffemissionen-Eine gesamtwirtschaftliche Abschätzung des Einflusses unterschiedlicher Rahmenbedingungen bei expliziter Modellierung der Technologiewahl im Industriesektor; Dokumentation Stahlindustrie. Karlsruhe and Osnabrück

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H (1947) Administrative Behaviour: A Study on Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organizations. New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorrel S., Schleich J, O'Malley E, Scott S (2004) The Economics of Energy Efficiency: Barriers to Cost-Effective Investment. Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (1986) Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 5(2): 200–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zwaan BCC, Gerlagh R, Klaassen G, Schrattenholzer L (2002) Endogenous technological change in climate change modelling. Energy Economics 24: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsch H (1996) Klimaschutz, Energiepolitik und Gesamtwirtschaft. Eine allgemeine Gleichgewichtsanalyse für die Europäische Union. München

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyant JP (1993) Costs of Reducing Global Carbon Emissions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 27–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Zundel S., Erdmann G., Nill J., Sartorius C. and Weiner D. (2003) Innovation, Zeit und Nachhaltigkeit-Zeitstrategien ökologischer Innovationspolitik — der Forschungsansatz. In Horbach, J., Huber, J., Schulz, T. (eds.): Nachhaltigkeit und Innovation. Rahmenbedingungen für Umweltinnovationen. München

    Google Scholar 

  • Zundel S., Erdmann G., Kemp R., Nill J. and Sartorius C. (2004) A conceptual framework for Ecological Innovation Policy. In Zundel, S., Sartorius, C. (eds.): Time Strategies for Innovation Policy towards Sustainability. Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Joachim Schleich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Walz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bernd Meyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian Lutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Applied Sciences Anhalt, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406, Bernburg

    Jens Horbach

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schleich, J., Walz, R., Meyer, B., Lutz, C. (2005). Policy Impacts on Macroeconomic Sustainability Indicators when Technical Change Is Endogenous. In: Horbach, J. (eds) Indicator Systems for Sustainable Innovation. Sustainability and Innovation. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1620-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation