Skip to main content

Firm Size and Monetary Policy Transmission — Evidence from German Business Survey Data

  • Conference paper
Ifo Survey Data in Business Cycle and Monetary Policy Analysis

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Audrestsch, D., and J. Elston (2002): “Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence on the Impact of Liquidity Constraints on Firm Investment Behavior in Germany,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernanke, B., and M. Gertler (1989): “Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations,” American Economic Review, 79, 14–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetti, S. (1995): “Distinguishing Theories of the Monetary Transmission Mechanism,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 77, 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatelain, J., A. Generale, I. Hernando, and U. v. P. Vermeulen (2003): “Firm Investment and Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area,” in Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area, ed. by I. Angeloni, A. Kashyap, and B. Mojon, pp. 133–161. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano, L., M. Eichenbaum, and C. Evans (1996): “The Effects of Monetary Policy Shocks: Evidence from the Flow of Funds,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 16–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, W. (1997): The Liquidity Effect: Identifying Permanent and Transitory Components of Money Growth. mimeo, University of Texas at Arlington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrmann, M., M. Ellison, and N. Valla (2003): “Regime-Dependent Impulse Response Functions in a Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression Model,” Economics Letters, 78, 295–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fazzari, S., R. Hubbard, and B. Petersen (1988): “Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp. 141–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertler, M., and S. Gilchrist (1994): “Monetary Policy, Business Cycles, and the Behavior of Small Manufacturing Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 309–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. (1989): “A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Non-Stationary Time Series and the Business Cycle,” Econometrica, 57, 357–384.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (1996): “Specification Testing in Markov-Switching Time-Series Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 70, 127–157.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, S. (1995): Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalckreuth, U. V. (2003): “Investment and Monetary Transmission in Germany: A Microeconometric Investigation,” in Monetary Policy Transmission in the Euro Area, ed. by I. Angeloni, A. Kashyap, and B. Mojon, pp. 133–161. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., and L. Zingales (1997): “Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (2000): “Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Are Not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints?,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, R., C. Plosser, J. Stock, and M. Watson (1991): “Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations,” American Economic Review, 81, 819–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiyotaki, N., and J. Moore (1997): “Credit Cycles,” Journal of Political Economy, 105, 211–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krolzig, H., and J. Toro (2000): “Classical and Modern Business Cycle Measurement: The European Case,” Economic Discussion Paper No. 60, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez-Quiros, G., and A. Timmermann (2000): “Firm Size and Cyclical Variations in Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 55, 1229–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried, N. (2000): “Microeconometric Evidence for a German Credit Channel,” Macroeconomics Working Paper No. 1/2000, University of Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. (1980): “Macroeconomics and Reality,” Econometrica, 48, 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ehrmann, M. (2005). Firm Size and Monetary Policy Transmission — Evidence from German Business Survey Data. In: Sturm, JE., Wollmershäuser, T. (eds) Ifo Survey Data in Business Cycle and Monetary Policy Analysis. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7908-1605-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics