Skip to main content

Colonization as Suburbanization

The Politics of the Land Market at the Frontier

  • Chapter
Book cover City of Collision
  • 614 Accesses

Abstract

Colonization in the traditional sense of implanting a civilian population and establishing settlements in an occupied territory has, with few historical exceptions, taken place in distant lands. The “mother” country encourages its citizens to settle these lands as a means of ensuring long-term territorial control. Colonizing populations gradually take over local rule, supporting the mother country by transforming direct military domination into a quasi-civilian form of administration, albeit backed by a strong military presence. Traditional colonization of this kind also results in the creation of first and second class societies, with the settlers enjoying full legal and economic rights, while the local, indigenous populations (if they have not been subject to genocide) are bound to subsistence economies and barred from major positions of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Abu Ayyash Abdul-Ilah, “Israeli Planning Policy in the Occupied Territories,” Journal of Palestine Studies 11(1) (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael Dumper, The Politics of Jerusalem since 1967 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamar Hermann and David Newman, “Extra-Parliamentarism in Israel: A Comparative Study of Peace Now and Gush Emunim,” Middle Eastern Studies 28(3) (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aharon Keller, Society and Settlement in the Land of Israel (Albany: SUNY Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruch Kimmerling, Zionism and Territory: The Socio-territorial Dimension of Zionist Politics (Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Newman, “The Territorial Politics of Exurbanization: Reflections on Thirty Years of Jewish Settlement in the West Bank,” Israel Affairs 3(1) (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Newman, “From ‘Hitnachhalut” to “Hitnatkut’: The Impact of Gush Emunim on Israeli Society and Politics,” Israel Studies (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • David Newman and Leviah Applebaum, “Defining the Urban Settlement: Planning Models and Functional Realities in Israel,” Urban Geography 10(3) (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval Portugali, “Jewish Settlement in the Occupied Territories: Israel’s Settlement Structure and the Palestinians,” Political Geography Quarterly 10 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalom Reichman, “Policy Reduces the World to Essentials: a Reflection on the Jewish Settlement Process in the West Bank Since 1967,” in Planning in turbulence, eds. D. Morley and A. Shachar (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Birkhäuser — Publishers for Architecture

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Newman, D. (2006). Colonization as Suburbanization. In: Misselwitz, P., Rieniets, T., Efrat, Z., Khamaisi, R., Nasrallah, R. (eds) City of Collision. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7868-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics