Skip to main content

Architecture

From Location to Nonlocation, from Presence to Absence

  • Chapter
Disappearing Architecture
  • 1927 Accesses

Abstract

During the 20th century not only distances and scales have changed under the influence of telematic media and machines, but even more so the relation to the location itself: hic et nunc, here and now, here and there have become variable quantities. Location and space as the basic media of architecture are being questioned (refer to Deconstruction). Nonlocation, dislocation, dematerialisation are new radical architectural categories. Individual decision procedures that position the architect as a building artist in the proximity of a traditional understanding of art, based on sculpture and painting, are also being replaced by new planning methods that are based on the complex system theories of the media and machines. Therefore computer-based algorithms can replace data of individual signatures as proved by deconstructivism and primarily by its successor, the metamorphic or biomorphic school of architecture (blob-architecture).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Peter Weibel & Manfred Wolff-Plottegg, Seminar for Experimental Architecture and Algorithm Design, lecture at Innsbruck University, May 30, 1996. In 1996 Wolff-Plottegg showed me the manuscript for a publication in a book, a collection of essays that I called “Architektur Algorithmen (Architecture Algorithms).” We jointly wrote a preface to this book on which this essay is based.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See also Mark Wigley. “Architecture has always been a central cultural institution valued above all for its provision of stability and order.” In: Philip Johnson and Mark Wigley: “Deconstructivist Architecture,” The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1988, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Daniel Libeskind, “Kein Ort an seiner Stelle,” Verlag der Kunst, Dresden/Basel 1995, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marc Augé, In the Metro, University of Minnesota Press 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helmut Wilke, Atopia, Frankfurt 2001; Helmut Wilke, Dystopia, Frankfurt 2002; Helmut Wilke, Heterotopia, Frankfurt 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. “Architecture non-standard,” ed. Edition Centre Pompidou Paris, 2003, exhibition 10.12.03–1.3.04.

    Google Scholar 

  7. “Architecture in Cyberspace. Architectural Design,” Academy Group, London 1995. See also Peter Weibel (ed), “The Media Pavilion. Art and Architecture in the Age of Cyberspace.” Austria, Biennale di Venezia, Vienna 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also: Gilles Deleuze, “Le Pli,” 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “To make the Invisible visible,” Christine Boyer calls “the progressive aspect of technology.” In: Christine Boyer, “Cybercity. Visual Perception in The Age of Electronic Communication.” Princeton Architectural Press 1996, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Georg Flachbart Peter Weibel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Birkhäuser — Publishers for Architecture

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weibel, P. (2005). Architecture. In: Flachbart, G., Weibel, P. (eds) Disappearing Architecture. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7674-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7674-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-7275-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7643-7674-1

  • eBook Packages: Architecture and DesignEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics