Advertisement

Some Experiences with the Use of Ontologies in Deliberative Agents

  • Ian Dickinson
  • Michael Wooldridge
Conference paper
  • 334 Downloads
Part of the Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies book series (WSSAT)

Abstract

We present our initial response to the OAS ‘03 Challenge Problem. The Challenge Problem proposes an agent-assisted travel scenario, and asks what the role of ontologies would be to support the agent’s activity. We discuss a belief-desire-intention (BDI) approach to the problem using our Nuin agent platform, and illustrate various ways in which ontology reasoning supports BDI-oriented problem solving and communications by the agents in the system.

Keywords

Agent applications BDI agents ontology semantic web 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ODP — The Open Directory Project. http://www.dmoz.orgGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    FIPA Interaction Protocol Specifications. 2003. http://www.fipa.org/repository/ips.php3Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Dave Banks, Steve Cayzer, Ian Dickinson, and Dave Reynolds. The ePerson Snippet Manager: a Semantic Web Application. (HPL-2002-328) HP Labs Technical Report. 2002. http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2002/HPL-2002-328.htmlGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    F. Bellifemine, A. Poggi and G. Rimassa. Developing Multi Agent Systems With a FIPA-Compliant Agent Framework. Software Practice and Experience. Vol. 31:2. 2001. pp. 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding and L. Masinter. Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax. (RFC2396) Internet Draft Standard. 1998.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila The Semantic Web. Scientific American. 2001.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    K. Binmore, A. Kirman and P. Tani. (eds). Frontiers of Game Theory. MIT Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Corcho, M. Fernandez-Lopez and A. Gómez-Pérez An RDF Schema for the OAS Challenge Problem. 2003. http://oas.otago.ac.nz/OAS2003/Challenge/MadridTravelOntology.rdfsGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Dean, G. Schreiber, F. van Harmelen, J. Hendler, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, L. Patel-Schneider, F. Peter and S. Lynn Andrea. OWL Web Ontology Language Reference. 2003. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-refGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    I. Dickinson and M. Wooldridge. Towards Practical Reasoning Agents for the Semantic Web. In Conf. on Automomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS’03). 2003.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    DMQ) D. Dou, D. McDermott, P. Qi. Ontology Translation by ontology Merging and Automated Reasoning. In Proc. EKAW Workshop on Ontologies for Agent Systems. 2002. pp. 3–18. http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/papers/DouMcDermottQi02.psGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    FIPA. FIPA ACL Message Structure Specification. (XC00061) 2000.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    FIPA. Abstract Architecture Specifiation. 2002. http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00001Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns. Addison Wesley Longhttp://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00061 man, 1994.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Hayes. RDF Semantics. 2004. http://www.w3.org/TR./rdf-mtGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    HP Labs. The Jena Semantic Web Toolkit. 2004. http://jena.sourceforge.netGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Kalyanpur. SWOOP (Semantic Web Ontology Overview and Perusal). 2004. http://www.mindswap.org/2004/SWOOPGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Rao AgentSpeak(L): BDI Agents Speak Out in a Logical Computable Language. In Proc. 7th European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World (MAAMAW ‘96). Springer-Verlag, 1996. pp. 42–55.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    A. Rao and M. Georgeff. BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice. In Proc. First Int. Conf on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95). 1995.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    SJ. Russell, P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach. (second edition) ed. Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Seaborne. RDQL — a query language for RDF. 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2004/SUBM-RDQL-20040109Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    P. Traverso. Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan-Kaufmann, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    W3C. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP). 1.1. 2000. http://www.w3.org/TR./SOAPGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The Resource Description Framework (RDF). 2004. http://www.w3.org/RDFGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Web Services Activity. 2004. http://www.w3.org/2002/wsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Dickinson
    • 1
  • Michael Wooldridge
    • 2
  1. 1.Hewlett-Packard LaboratoriesStoke Gifford BristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations