Skip to main content

Where and When was Knowledge Managed?

Exploring Multiple Versions of KM in Organizations

  • Chapter
Book cover Rethinking Knowledge Management

Part of the book series: Information Science and Knowledge Management ((ISKM,volume 12))

Abstract

The chapter presents a case study of new technology in a rapid response social work unit that is part of an e-government program in a Scottish municipality. The objective of the project was to improve the configuration and delivery of resources for housebound clients, and it was construed as a simple knowledge integration exercise by senior management. Taking a social informatics perspective, the authors interpret the case in terms of competing discourses or multiple versions of KM, and suggest that KM versioning is a characteristic, but underexplored, feature of complex projects that involve multiple actors with different knowledge trajectories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baxter, L. (2000). Bugged. In Prichard, C., Hill, R. Chumer, M. & Wilmott, H. (Eds.), Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning. Houndmills: MacMillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. (1994). Science on the run: information management and industrial geophysics at schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G., & Star, S. (2000). Sorting things out. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City Council, 2004. Evaluation document.City Council, 2004. Internal document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, M. (2005). Public sector IT failures. Propsect, 115 (10), 48–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space and action nets. Organization, 11 (6), 773–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E. (2002). Mundane knowledge management and micro-level organizational learning: an ethological approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology , 53 (12), 1038–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, E., & Horton, K. (2005). Computerization movements as a frame or e-government studies. Paper presented at the CRITO workshop, Beckma Centre, Irvine 12 March 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (2002). Social capital, value and measure: Antonio Negri’s Challenge to Capitalism. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12), 1074–1082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia, H., & Hara, N. (2004). The quality of evidence in knowledge management literature: the guru version. Retrieved from www.slis.indiana.edu/research/ working_papers/files/SLISWP-04-01.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekbia, H. & Kling, R. (2003). Power Issues in Knowledge Management. At rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/papers.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. (1993). Configurations: crystallizing contingency. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 3 (1), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Gallacher, R. Procter, & R. Williams. (2001). The Politics of Usability: Can One Size Fit All? In L. Trenner & J. Bawa (Eds.) Usability, Politics and New Media. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, A. (2002). Electronic government: design, applications and management. London: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamelink C. (1988). Some Reflections on the Technology Gamble. In F. Van Riijn & R. Williams (Eds.), Concerning home telematics (pp. 21–25). North- Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, K., & Davenport, E. (2005). Rapid response service provision in a world of multiple sources. Draft available from authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, K., & Davenport, E. (2004). Innovation and Hybrid Genres: Disturbing Social Rhythm in Legal Practice. In T. Leino, T. Saarinen, S. Klein (Eds.), The European Information Systems profession in the global networking environment (ECIS 2004). Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M. (2002). Knowledge sharing in organisations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacono, S., & Kling, R. (1998). Computerization movements: the rise of the Internet and distant forms of work. Retrieved February, 26, 2005, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/kling/pubs/Kling_comp.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R. (1987). Defining the boundaries of computing in complex organizations. In R. Boland & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical issues in information systems research (pp. 307–362). New York: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., & Iacono, S. (1994). Computerization movements and the mobilization of support for computerization. Retrieved February, 12, 2005 from http://www.slis.indian.edu/faculty/kling/pubs/MOBIL94C.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Kling, R., & Scacchi, W. (1982). The web of computing: computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers, 21, 1–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M., & Srikantaiah, K. (2004). Three stages of knowledge management. In K. Srikantaiah & M. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge management: lessons learned (pp. 3–9). London: Learned Information Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, P., Fong, P., & Irani, Z. (2005). Management of knowledge in project environments. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (1997). Workplace studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., & Hislop, D. (2000). Intranets and knowledge management: de-centered technologies and the limits of technological discourse. In C. Prichard, R. Hull, M. Chumer & H. Willmott (Eds.). Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning (pp. 88–106). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W.J., & Gash D.C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12 (2), 174–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, C., Hull, R., Chumer, M., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2000). Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. (2002). Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 213–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. (2004). Framing processes, ideology and discursive fields. In D. Snow, S. Soule & D. Kriesi (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikantaiah, S. & Koenig, M. (Eds.). (2004). Knowledge management: lessons learned. Medford NJ: Learned Information.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1996). Supporting articulation work. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices (pp. 407–423). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38 (9), 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. Oxford; Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Cabinet Office. (1999). Modernising Government. HMSO, London. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bastelaer, B. (2001). eEurope and user aspects of ICT. COST 269. User aspects of ICT. COST Working paper No. 1. Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://www.cost269.org/documents/e_Europe_Final.rtf

    Google Scholar 

  • Widen-Wulff, G. & Davenport, E. (2005). Information Sharing and Timing: Findings from Two Finnish Organizations. In F. Crestani & I. Ruthven (Eds.), Information Context: Nature, Impact, and Role: 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, Proceedings of CoLIS 2005, Glasgow, UK, June 4–8, 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 3507. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1997). The social shaping of information and communication technologies. In H. Kubicek, W. Dutton, & R. Williams (Eds.), The social shaping of information superhighways: European and American roads to the information society (pp. 299–238). Frankfurt and New York: Campus/St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, T.D. (2002). The nonsense of “knowledge management, Information Research, 8(1), 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J. (1993). Control through communication: the rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davenport, E., Horton, K. (2007). Where and When was Knowledge Managed?. In: McInerney, C.R., Day, R.E. (eds) Rethinking Knowledge Management. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71010-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71011-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics