Abstract
The chapter presents a case study of new technology in a rapid response social work unit that is part of an e-government program in a Scottish municipality. The objective of the project was to improve the configuration and delivery of resources for housebound clients, and it was construed as a simple knowledge integration exercise by senior management. Taking a social informatics perspective, the authors interpret the case in terms of competing discourses or multiple versions of KM, and suggest that KM versioning is a characteristic, but underexplored, feature of complex projects that involve multiple actors with different knowledge trajectories.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baxter, L. (2000). Bugged. In Prichard, C., Hill, R. Chumer, M. & Wilmott, H. (Eds.), Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning. Houndmills: MacMillan Press.
Bowker, G. (1994). Science on the run: information management and industrial geophysics at schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
Bowker, G., & Star, S. (2000). Sorting things out. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
City Council, 2004. Evaluation document.City Council, 2004. Internal document.
Cross, M. (2005). Public sector IT failures. Propsect, 115 (10), 48–53.
Czarniawska, B. (2004). On time, space and action nets. Organization, 11 (6), 773–791.
Davenport, E. (2002). Mundane knowledge management and micro-level organizational learning: an ethological approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology , 53 (12), 1038–1046.
Davenport, E., & Horton, K. (2005). Computerization movements as a frame or e-government studies. Paper presented at the CRITO workshop, Beckma Centre, Irvine 12 March 2005.
Day, R. (2002). Social capital, value and measure: Antonio Negri’s Challenge to Capitalism. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (12), 1074–1082.
Ekbia, H., & Hara, N. (2004). The quality of evidence in knowledge management literature: the guru version. Retrieved from www.slis.indiana.edu/research/ working_papers/files/SLISWP-04-01.pdf
Ekbia, H. & Kling, R. (2003). Power Issues in Knowledge Management. At rkcsi.indiana.edu/archive/CSI/papers.html
Fleck, J. (1993). Configurations: crystallizing contingency. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 3 (1), 15–36.
S. Gallacher, R. Procter, & R. Williams. (2001). The Politics of Usability: Can One Size Fit All? In L. Trenner & J. Bawa (Eds.) Usability, Politics and New Media. 2001.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Grönlund, A. (2002). Electronic government: design, applications and management. London: Idea Group Publishing.
Hamelink C. (1988). Some Reflections on the Technology Gamble. In F. Van Riijn & R. Williams (Eds.), Concerning home telematics (pp. 21–25). North- Holland, Amsterdam.
Horton, K., & Davenport, E. (2005). Rapid response service provision in a world of multiple sources. Draft available from authors.
Horton, K., & Davenport, E. (2004). Innovation and Hybrid Genres: Disturbing Social Rhythm in Legal Practice. In T. Leino, T. Saarinen, S. Klein (Eds.), The European Information Systems profession in the global networking environment (ECIS 2004). Turku, Finland: Turku School of Economics.
Huysman, M. (2002). Knowledge sharing in organisations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Iacono, S., & Kling, R. (1998). Computerization movements: the rise of the Internet and distant forms of work. Retrieved February, 26, 2005, from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/kling/pubs/Kling_comp.htm
Kling, R. (1987). Defining the boundaries of computing in complex organizations. In R. Boland & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical issues in information systems research (pp. 307–362). New York: Wiley & Sons.
Kling, R., & Iacono, S. (1994). Computerization movements and the mobilization of support for computerization. Retrieved February, 12, 2005 from http://www.slis.indian.edu/faculty/kling/pubs/MOBIL94C.htm
Kling, R., & Scacchi, W. (1982). The web of computing: computer technology as social organization. Advances in Computers, 21, 1–90.
Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Koenig, M., & Srikantaiah, K. (2004). Three stages of knowledge management. In K. Srikantaiah & M. Koenig (Eds.), Knowledge management: lessons learned (pp. 3–9). London: Learned Information Inc.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Love, P., Fong, P., & Irani, Z. (2005). Management of knowledge in project environments. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Luff, P., Hindmarsh, J., & Heath, C. (1997). Workplace studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J.D., & Zald, M. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., Swan, J., & Hislop, D. (2000). Intranets and knowledge management: de-centered technologies and the limits of technological discourse. In C. Prichard, R. Hull, M. Chumer & H. Willmott (Eds.). Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning (pp. 88–106). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Orlikowski, W.J., & Gash D.C. (1994). Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12 (2), 174–207.
Prichard, C., Hull, R., Chumer, M., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2000). Managing knowledge: critical investigations of work and learning Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Schultze, U., & Leidner, D. (2002). Studying knowledge management in information systems research: Discourses and theoretical assumptions. MIS Quarterly, 26 (3), 213–242.
Snow, D. (2004). Framing processes, ideology and discursive fields. In D. Snow, S. Soule & D. Kriesi (Eds.), Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Oxford: Blackwell.
Snow, D., & Benford, R. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
Srikantaiah, S. & Koenig, M. (Eds.). (2004). Knowledge management: lessons learned. Medford NJ: Learned Information.
Suchman, L. (1996). Supporting articulation work. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices (pp. 407–423). San Diego: Academic Press.
Suchman, L. (1995). Making work visible. Communications of the ACM, 38 (9), 56–64.
Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
UK Cabinet Office. (1999). Modernising Government. HMSO, London. Retrieved February 10, 2005, from http://www.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310.htm.
Van Bastelaer, B. (2001). eEurope and user aspects of ICT. COST 269. User aspects of ICT. COST Working paper No. 1. Retrieved February 5, 2005, from http://www.cost269.org/documents/e_Europe_Final.rtf
Widen-Wulff, G. & Davenport, E. (2005). Information Sharing and Timing: Findings from Two Finnish Organizations. In F. Crestani & I. Ruthven (Eds.), Information Context: Nature, Impact, and Role: 5th International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, Proceedings of CoLIS 2005, Glasgow, UK, June 4–8, 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 3507. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Williams, R. (1997). The social shaping of information and communication technologies. In H. Kubicek, W. Dutton, & R. Williams (Eds.), The social shaping of information superhighways: European and American roads to the information society (pp. 299–238). Frankfurt and New York: Campus/St. Martin’s Press.
Wilson, T.D. (2002). The nonsense of “knowledge management, Information Research, 8(1), 144.
Yates, J. (1993). Control through communication: the rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davenport, E., Horton, K. (2007). Where and When was Knowledge Managed?. In: McInerney, C.R., Day, R.E. (eds) Rethinking Knowledge Management. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 12. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71010-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71011-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)