Summary
Four codes used to simulate unsaturated flow with atmospheric interactions are described and evaluated. The codes are similar conceptually and function in a similar manner. However, the codes use different algorithms, and therefore yield different predictions for the same input. A field validation exercise conducted with three of the codes shows that the predictions appear realistic regardless of which code is being used. However, each code provides a different prediction, and none of the predictions are in agreement with field measurements. The differences can be attributed in part to the methods used to implement the atmospheric boundary. More subtle features of the codes also have a significant effect on predictions (e.g., hydraulic properties model, hysteresis, vapor flow, thermally-driven flow, transpiration algorithms, ground freezing, snow melt, etc.). The user should consider each of these features carefully so that realistic, but conservative predictions are obtained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albright W, Benson C, Gee G, Roesler A, Abichou T, Apiwantragoon P, Lyles B, Rock S (2004) Field water balance of landfill final covers, J Environ Quality 33(6):2317–2332
Benson C, Abichou T, Wang X, Gee G, Albright W (1999) Test Section Installation Instructions – Alternative Cover Assessment Program. Environmental Geotechnics Report 99–3. Dept of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
Benson C, Abichou T, Albright W, Gee G, Roesler A (2001) Field evaluation of alternative earthen final covers, Int J Phytoremediation 3(1):1–21
Benson C, Bohnhoff G, Apiwantragoon P, Ogorzalek A, Shackelford C, Albright W (2004) Comparison of model predictions and field data for an ET cover. In: Tailings and Mine Waste ’04. Balkema, Leiden, Netherlands:137–142
Benson C (2006) Numerical modeling in geoenvironmental practice, Geo-Strata–Geo Institute of ASCE 6(4):16–19
Bohnhoff G (2005) Water Balance Predictions and Field Data for Water Balance Covers in Semi-Arid Regions. MS Thesis, Geological Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
Brooks R, Corey A (1966) Properties of porous media affecting fluid flow, J Irrig and Drainage 92(2):61–88
Fayer M (2000) UNSAT-H Version 3.0: Unsaturated Soil Water and Heat Flow Model – Theory, User Manual, and Examples. PNNL-13249. Pacific Northwest Laboratories, Richland, WA, USA
Gitirana G, Fredlund M, Fredlund D (2005) Infiltration-runoff boundary conditions in seepage analysis. In: Proc 58th Canadian Geotechnical Conf and 6th Joint IAH-CGS Conf, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Meerdink J, Benson C, Khire M (1995) Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of two compacted barrier soils, J Geotech Eng 122(7):565–576
Scanlon B, Christman M, Reedy R, Porro I, Šimunek J, Flerchinger G (2002) Intercode comparisons for simulating water balance of surficial sediments in semiarid regions, Water Res Res 38(12):1–16
Schaap M, Leij F (2000) Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the Mualem–van Genuchten model, Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:843–851
van Genuchten M (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benson, C.H. (2007). Modeling Unsaturated Flow and Atmospheric Interactions. In: Schanz, T. (eds) Theoretical and Numerical Unsaturated Soil Mechanics. Springer Proceedings in Physics 113, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69876-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69876-0_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69875-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69876-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)