Summary
In this paper the predictive capabilities of a recently proposed yield criterion, CB2001, are assessed. Also, a numerical scheme for identifying the material coefficients is presented. It is shown that although convexity is not a default property of the criterion, it can be achieved numerically. Applications to two sheet forming operations are presented. Using the commercial FE code ABAQUS, simulations of the deep-drawing of a cylindrical cup and springback analysis for unconstrained bending are performed. Two aluminum alloys were considered and modelled with Hill’48 (ABAQUS) and CB2001 (UMAT). The results are also compared with another popular criterion, Yld’96. We conclude that for sheet forming operations were large plastic deformations are involved, accurate fit of the initial plastic anisotropy is a basic condition for successful FE simulations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barlat F., Maeda Y., Chung K., Yanagawa M., Brem J.C., Hayashida Y., Lege D.J., Matsui K., Murtha S.J., Hattori S., Becker R.C., Makosey S., “Yield function development for aluminum alloy sheet”, J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 45, 1997, p. 1727
Barlat F., Cazacu O., Zyczkowski M., Banabic D., Yoon J.W, Yield surface plasticity and anisotropy in sheet metals, in: Continuum Scale Simulation of Engineering Materials, Fundamentals– Microstructures– Process Applications, Eds: D. Raabe, L.-Q. Chen, Barlat F., Roters F., Publisher: Wiley-VCH Verlag Berlin GmbH, 2003, p. 145–183.
Cazacu O., Barlat F., “Generalization of Drucker’s yield criterion to orthotropy”, Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, vol. 6 no. 6, 2001, p. 613–630.
Cazacu O., Barlat F., Application of representation theory to describe yielding of anisotropic aluminum alloys, International Journal of Engineering Science, 41, 12,2003, p. 1367–1385.
Drucker D.C., “Relation of experiments to mathematical theories of plasticity”, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 16, 1949, p. 349–357.
Liu S.I., “On representation of anisotropic invariants”, International Journal of Engineering Science, no. 20, p. 1099–1109, 1982.
Simo J.C., Hughes T.J.R, Computational Inelasticity, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1999.
Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W.T., Flannery B.P., Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Yoon J.W., Barlat F., Chung K., Pourboghrat F., Yang D.Y., “Earing predictions based on asymmetric nonquadratic yield function”, International Journal of Plasticity, 16, 2000, p. 1075–1104.
Yoon J.W., Pourboghrat F., Chung K., , Yang D.Y., “Springback prediction for sheet metal forming process using a 3D hybrid membrane/shell method”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 44, 2002, p. 2133–2153.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soare, S., Yoon, J., Cazacu, O., Barlat, F. (2007). Applications of a Recently Proposed Anisotropic Yield Function to Sheet Forming. In: Advanced Methods in Material Forming. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69845-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69845-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69844-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69845-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)