Skip to main content

Unification of the Models for Types, Classes and State Machines

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Object-Oriented Technologys (ECOOP 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1357))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The static model, specified formally, and the dynamic model, represented by hierarchical state machines, are intimately related. By defining a mapping between the two, we are able to provide a definition of inheritance, multiple inheritance and behavioral subtyping for state machines based on that for formally specified types and classes, and provide a graphical representation for formal specifications in terms of state machines. The state machine notation is based on statecharts. It, however, supports both a declarative style, appropriate for types, and an imperative style, appropriate for classes. State machines may be parameterized and may be viewed from different perspectives, based on an arbitrary choice of state predicates. And states are interpreted not as an expression of concurrency, but result from a choice of independent state predicates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7 References

  1. Daugherty, Gary. Formal Specifications and State Machines, technical report, Rockwell International, December 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gries, D. The Science of Programming, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1981.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Liskov, B. and J. Wing. “A behavioral notion of subtyping”, ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, November 1994, pp. 1811..1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harel, D. “Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems”, in Science of Computer Programming, vol. 8, pp. 231..274, 1987.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Coleman, Derek, Fiona Hayes and Stephen Bear. “Introducing Objectcharts or How to Use Statecharts in Object-Oriented Design”, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 9..18, January 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, Bertrand. Eiffel: The Language, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Daugherty, G.W. (1998). Unification of the Models for Types, Classes and State Machines. In: Bosch, J., Mitchell, S. (eds) Object-Oriented Technologys. ECOOP 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1357. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69687-3_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69687-3_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64039-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69687-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics