Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Space Structures Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Cognition

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1404))

Abstract

As Talmy has observed, language schematizes space; language provides a systematic framework to describe space, by selecting certain aspects of a referent scene while neglecting the others. Here, we consider the ways that space and the things in it are schematized in perception and cognition, as well as in language. We propose the Schematization Similarity Conjecture: to the extent that space is schematized similarly in language and cognition, language will be successful in conveying space. We look at the evidence in both language and perception literature to support this view. Finally, we analyze schematizations of routes conveyed in sketch maps or directions, finding parallels in the kind of information omitted and retained in both.

We are grateful for the insightful comments of an anonymous reviewer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biederman, I.: Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, (1987) 115–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bowerman, M.: Semantic and syntactic development: A review of what, when, and how in language acquisition. In: R. L. Schiefelbusch (ed.): Bases of language intervention, Vol. 1. University Park Press, Baltimore. (1978a) 97–189

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bowerman, M.: The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation into some current conflicts. In: N. Waterson and C. Snow (eds.): The development of communication: Social and pragmatic factors in language acquisition. Wiley, NY. (1978b) 263–287

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, R.: How shall a thing be called? Psychological Review, 65, (1958) 14–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N.: Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, (1992) 74–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., and Lanca, M.: Retrieving spatial relations from observation and memory. Unpublished manuscript. (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce, V.: Recognizing faces. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Byrne, R. W.: Memory for urban geography. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, (1979) 147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carlson-Radvansky, L. & Irwin, D. E.: Frames of reference in vision and language: Where is above? Cognition, 46, (1993) 223–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, E. V. What’s in a word? On the child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In: T. E. Moore (ed.): Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. Academic Press, NY. (1973). 65–110

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clark, H. H. & Clark, E. V.: Psychology and language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, NY. (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, H. H. and Clark, E. V.: When nouns surface as verbs. Language, 55, (1979), 420–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cutting, J. E., Proffitt, D. R., and Kozlowski, L. T.: A biomechanical invariant for gait perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance (1978) 357–372

    Google Scholar 

  14. Denis, M.: La description d’itineraires: Des reperes pour des actions. Notes et Documents LIMSI No. 94-14 Juillet, 1994 (The description of routes: Landmarks for actions) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond, R. and Carey, S.: Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, (1986). 107–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franklin, N., Henkel, L. A., and Zangas, T.: Parsing surrounding space into regions. Memory and Cognition, 23, (1995) 397–407

    Google Scholar 

  17. Franklin, N. and Tversky, B.: Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, (1990) 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garrod, S. C. and Sanford, A. J.: Discourse models as interfaces between language and the spatial world. Journal of Semantics, 6, (1989) 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentner, D.: Some interesting differences between verbs and nouns. Cognition and Brain theory, 4, (1981) 161–178

    Google Scholar 

  20. Glenberg. A. M., Meyer, M., and Lindem, K.: Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, (1987) 69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gryl, A.: Analyse et modelisation des processus discursifs mis en oeuvre dans la description d’itineraires. Notes et Documents LIMSI No. 95-30. Decembre, 1995 (Analysis and modeling of discourse in the description of routes) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hagen, M. A. and Perkins, D.: A refutation of the hypothesis of the superfidelity of caricatures relative to photographs. Perception, 12, (1983) 55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayward, W. G. and Tarr, M. J.: Spatial language and spatial representation. Cognition, 55, (1995) 39–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hegarty, M.: Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, (1992) 1084–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Herskovits, A.: Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hochberg, J.: Perception. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman, D. D. & Richards, W. A.: Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, (1984) 65–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Howard, I. P.: Human visual orientation. Wiley, NY (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huttenlocher, J. Hedges, L. V., and Duncan, S.: Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, (1991) 352–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Huttenlocher, J. and Lui, F.: The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, (1979) 141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ibbotson, A. and Bryant, P. E.: The perpendicular error and the vertical effect. Perception, 5, (1976) 319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johansson, G.: Visual motion perception. Scientific American, 232, (1975) 76–88

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R., Whelan, S. M., and Hecht, H.: Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, (1992) 669–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Klein, W.: Local deixis in route directions. In: R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds.): Speech, place and action. Wiley, NY (1982) 161–182

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lakoff, G.: Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Landau, B. and Jackendoff, R.: “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16:2, (1993) 217–238

    Google Scholar 

  37. Landau, B. Smith, L. B. and Jones, S. S.: The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, (1988) 299–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Landau, B. Smith, L. B. and Jones, S. S.: Syntactic context and the shape bias in children’s and adults’ lexical learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, (1992) 807–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Leibowitz, H. W., Guzy, L. T., Peterson, E., & Blake, P. T.: Quantitative perceptual estimates: Verbal versus nonverbal retrieval techniques. Perception, 22, (1993) 1051–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Levelt, W. J. M.: Linearization in describing spatial networks. In: S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.): Processes, beliefs, and questions. Reidel, Dordrecht (1982) 199–220

    Google Scholar 

  41. Linde, C. and Labov, W.: Spatial structures as a site for the study of language and thought. Language, 51, (1975) 924–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Logan, G. D. and Sadler, D. D.: A computational analysis of the apprehension of spatial relations. In: P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.): Language and Space. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1996) 493–529

    Google Scholar 

  43. Marr, D.: Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman, NY (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Morrow, D. G., Bower, G. H., and Greenspan, S.: Updating situation models during narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language (1989) 292–312

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morrow, D. G. and Clark, H. H.: Interpreting words in spatial descriptions. Language and Cognitive Processes, 3, (1988) 275–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. McBeath, M. K., Schiano, D. J., and Tversky, B.: Three-dimensional bilateral symmetry bias in judgments of figural identity and orientation. Psychological Science, 8, (1997) 217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Moar, I. & Bower, G. H.: Inconsistency in spatial knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 11, (1983) 107–113

    Google Scholar 

  48. Morris, M. W. & Murphy, G. L.: Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory and Cognition, 18, (1990) 407–418

    Google Scholar 

  49. Murphy, G. L. and Smith, E. E.: Basic-level superiority in picture categorization: Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, (1982) 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Newtson, D., Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., and Cutino, S.: The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5, (1987) 191–237

    Google Scholar 

  51. Palmer, S., Rosch, E. & Chase, P.: Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In: J. B. Long & A. D. Baddeley (eds.): Attention and Performance, IX. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, New Jersey (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pani, J. R., William, C. T., and Shippey, G. T.: Determinants of the perception of rotational motion: Orientation of the motion to the object and to the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nelson, T. O. and Chaiklin, S.: Immediate memory for spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, (1980) 212–228

    Google Scholar 

  54. Perrig, W. and Kintsch, W.: Propositional and situational representations of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, (1985) 503–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rifkin, A.: Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies. Memory and Cognition, 13, (1985) 538–556

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rock, I.: The logic of perception. MIT Press, Cambridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rosch, E.: Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, (1975) 192–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Rosch, E.: Principles of categorization. In: E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd: Cognition and categorization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1978) 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D. and Boyes-Braem, P.: Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 6, (1976) 382–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schooler, J. W. and Engstler-Schooler, T. Y.: Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, (1991) 36–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schwartz, D. L. & Black, J. B.: Analog imagery in mental model reasoning: Depictive models. Cognitive Psychology, 30, (1996) 154–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Shapiro, P. N. and Penrod, S.: Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, (1986) 39–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Shiffrar, M. M. & Shepard, R. N.: Comparison of cube rotations around axes inclined relative to the environment or to the cube. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, (1991) 44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Spelke, E. S., Breinlinger, K., Macomber, J., and Jacobson, K.: Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, (1992) 605–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Streeter, L. A., Vitello, D. and Wonsiewicz, S. A.: How to tell people where to go: Comparing navigational aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 22, (1985) 549–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Talmy, L.: Semantics and syntax of motion. In: John P. Kimball (ed.): Syntax and semantics, Vol. 4. Academic Press, NY (1975) 181–238

    Google Scholar 

  67. Talmy, L.: How language structures space. In: H. L. Pick, Jr. & L. P. Acredolo (eds.): Spatial orientation: Theory, research and application. Plenum, NY (1983) 225–282

    Google Scholar 

  68. Talmy, L.: Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In: Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 3, T. Shopen (ed.): Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985) 57–149

    Google Scholar 

  69. Talmy, L.: Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12, (1988) 49–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Talmy, L.: Fictive motion and change in language and perception. In: P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett (eds.): Language and space. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996) 211–276

    Google Scholar 

  71. Taylor, H. A., Naylor, S. J. and Chechile, N. A.: (In press) Goal-specific influences on the representation of spatial perspectives. Memory and Cognition.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Taylor, H. A. & Tversky, B.: Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition, 20, (1992a) 483–496

    Google Scholar 

  73. Taylor, H. A. & Tversky, B.: Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, (1992b) 261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B.: Perspective in spatial descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, (1996) 371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Taylor, M. M.: Effect of anchoring and distance perception on the reproduction of forms. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 12 (1961) 203–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tversky, B.: Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, (1981) 407–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Tversky, B.: Categories and parts. In: C. Craig and T. Givon (Eds.): Noun classes and categorization. John Benjamins Publishing Co, Philadelphia (1985) 63–75

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tversky, B.: Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, (1981) 407–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tversky, B.: Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum, 23, (1992) 131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Tversky, B. and Hemenway, K.: Objects, parts, and categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, (1984) 169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Tversky, B., Taylor, H. A., and Mainwaring, S.: Langage et perspective spatial (Spatial perspectives in language). In: M. Denis (Eds.): Langage et cognition spatiale. Masson, Paris (1997) 25–49

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vandeloise, C.: L’espace en francais: Semantique des prepositions spatiales. Editions du Seuil, Paris. (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Wunderlich, D. and Reinelt, R.: How to get there from here. In R. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds.): Speech, place, and action. Wiley, Chichester (1982) 183–201

    Google Scholar 

  84. Yin, R. K.: Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, (1969) 141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zacks, J. and Tversky, B.: What’s happening? The structure of event perception. Proceedings of the Meetings of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Bldg. 420, Stanford, California, 94305-2130

    Barbara Tversky & Paul U. Lee

Authors
  1. Barbara Tversky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul U. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg, Vogt-Kölln-Straße 30, D-22527, Hamburg, Germany

    Christian Freksa  & Christopher Habel  & 

  2. Fachbereich Psychologie, Universität Trier, D-54286, Trier, Germany

    Karl F. Wender

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tversky, B., Lee, P.U. (1998). How Space Structures Language. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64603-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69342-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation