Abstract
This chapter gives an overview of our ongoing experimental research in the MeMoSpace project, concerning the cognitive processes underlying human spatial reasoning. Our theoretical background is mental model theory, which conceives reasoning as a process in which mental models of the given information are constructed and inspected to solve a reasoning task. We first report some findings of our previous work and then two new experiments on spatial relational inference, which were conducted to investigate well-known effects from relational and syllogistic reasoning. (1) Continuity effect: n-term-series problems with continuous (W r 1 X, X r 2 Y, Y r 3 Z) and semi-continuous (X r 2 Y, Y r 3 Z, W r 1 X) premise order are easier than tasks with discontinuous order (Y r 3 Z, W r 1 X, X r 2 Y). (2) Figural bias: the order of terms in the premises (X r Y, Y r Z or Y r X, Z r Y) effects the order of terms in the conclusion (X r Z or Z r X). In the first experiment subjects made more errors and took more time to process the premises when in discontinuous order. In the second experiment subjects showed the general preference for the term order Z r X in the generated conclusions, modulated by a “figural bias”: subjects used X r Z more often if the premise term order was X r Y, Y r Z, whereas Z r X was used most often for the premise term order Y r X, Z r Y. Results are discussed in the framework of mental model theory with special reference to computational models of spatial reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J. F. (1983). Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, 26, 832–843.
Berendt, B. (1996). Explaining preferred mental models in Allen inferences with a metrical model of imagery. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. (pp. 489–494). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 564–575.
De Soto, L. B., London, M. & Handel, L. S. (1965). Social reasoning and spatial para-logic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 513–521.
De Vooght, G., & Vandierendonck, A. (in press). Spatial mental models in linear reasoning. Kognitionswissenschaft (Special issue “Räumliche mentale Modelle / Spatial mental models”).
Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296–306.
Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning. The psychology of deduction. Hove (UK): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Freksa, C. (1991). Qualitative spatial reasoning. In D. M. Mark & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space (pp. 361–372). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gapp, K.-P. (1997). Objektlokalisation [Object Localisation]. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Hunter, I. M. L. (1957). The solving of three-term series problems. British Journal of Psychology, 48, 286–298.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). The three-term series problem. Cognition, 1, 58–82.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Bara, B. G. (1984). Syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 16, 1–62.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R.M.J. (1991). Deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Steedman, M. (1978). The psychology of syllogisms. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 64–99.
Knauff, M. (1997). Räumliches Wissen und Gedächtnis [Spatial knowledge and memory]. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., & Renz, J. (1997). A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: Results from an empirical investigation. In S. C. Hirtle & A. U. Frank (Eds.), Spatial information theory. A theoretical basis for GIS. Proceedings of COSIT’ 97 (pp.193–206). New York: Springer.
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (1995). Preferred mental models in qualitative spatial reasoning: A cognitive assessment of Allen’s calculus. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 200–205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Knauff, M. Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (1997). Analogizität und Perspektive in räumlichen mentalen Modellen [Analog representation and perspective in spatial mental models]. In C. Umbach, M. Grabski & R. Hörnig (Hrsg.). Perspektive in Sprache und Raum (pp. 35–60). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Strube, G. (1998). Continuity effect and figural bias in spatial relational inference. Submitted to the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison-Wisconsin.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ligozat, G. (1990). Weak representations of interval algebras. Proceedings of the Eighth. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2, pp. 715–720). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press / MIT Press.
Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Maybery, M.T., Bain, J.D., & Halford, G. S. (1986). Information-processing demands of transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 600–613.
Nebel, B., & Bürckert, H.J. (1995). Reasoning about temporal relations: A maximal tractable subclass of Allen’s interval algebra. Communication of the ACM, 42, 43–66.
Potts, G. R., & Scholz, K.W. (1975). The internal representation of a three-term series problem. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 439–452.
Rauh, R., & Schlieder, C. (1997). Symmetries of model construction in spatial relational inference. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 638–643). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., & Knauff, M. (1997). Präferierte mentale Modelle beim räumlich-relationalen Schließen: Empirie und kognitive Modellierung [Preferred mental models in spatial relational inference: Empirical results and cognitive modeling]. Kognitionswissenschaft, 6, 21–34.
Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schlieder, C. (1995). The construction of preferred mental models in reasoning with the interval relations (Tech. Rep. 5/95). Freiburg: Institut für Informatik und Gesellschaft der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (appears also in: C. Habel & al. (Eds.), Mental models in discourse comprehension and reasoning).
Trabasso, T., Riley, C. A., & Wilson, E. G. (1975). The representation of linear orders and spatial strategies in reasoning. A developmenal study. In R. J. Falmagne (Ed.), Reasoning: Representation and Processes. New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Knauff, M., Rauh, R., Schlieder, C., Strube, G. (1998). Mental Models in Spatial Reasoning. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69342-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64603-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69342-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive