Advertisement

Towards an Intelligent Tutoring System for Situation Awareness Training in Complex, Dynamic Environments

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1452)

Abstract

Some accidents in complex systems have been attributed to a lack of situation awareness. Despite increased use of automation and improvements in display design, accidents of these types have not been eliminated. One option is to train operators to acquire and to maintain situation awareness. This paper describes an instructional design, human-computer interface, and the computational architecture for implementing an intelligent tutoring system for training situation awareness. The system furnishes detailed guidance in the early practice stages of training and provides performance feedback in the reinforcement stages of training. The system includes a debriefing capability to structure the review after performance and aid in the evaluation of student performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Kulik, C.C., Kulik, J.A & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bass, E.J., Ernst-Fortin, S.T., & Duncan, P.C. (In press). An intelligent debriefing tool for situation awareness training. In Proceedings of the 11th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society (FLAIRS) Conference, May 17–20, 1998, Sanibel Island, FL.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass, E.J., Ernst-Fortin, S.T., Duncan, P.C., & Small, R.L. (1997). Training and aiding situation awareness: A context based approach. (Final Report under US Air Force contract # F41624-97-C-5027). Norcross, GA: Search Technology, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bass, E.J., Zenyuh, J.P., Small, R.L., & Fortin, S.T. (1996). A context-based approach to training situation awareness. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Symposium on Human Interaction with Complex Systems. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burton, R.R. & Brown, J.S. (1982). An investigation of computer coaching for informal learning activities. In D. H. Sleeman and J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp.79–98)., London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chappell, A.R., Crowther, E.G., Mitchell, C.M. & Govindaraj, T. (1997). The VNAV tutor: Addressing a mode awareness difficulty for pilots of glass cockpit aircraft. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 27(3), 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu, R.W., Mitchell, C.M., & Jones, P.M. (1995). Using the operator function model and OFMspert as the basis for an intelligent tutoring system: Towards a tutor/aid paradigm for operators of supervisory control systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man And Cybernetics, 25(7), 937–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 454–494). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Degani, A. & Wiener, E.L. (1997). Procedures in complex systems: The airline cockpit. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 27(3), 302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Endsley, M.R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ernst-Fortin, S.T., Small, R.L., Bass, E.J. & Hogans, Jr., J. (1997). An adaptive cockpit hazard monitoring system. (Final Report under US Air Force contract #F33615-95-C-3611). Norcross, GA: Search Technology, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fischer, P.M. & Mandl, H. (1988). Improvement in the acquisition of knowledge by informing feedback. In H. Mandl and A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 187–241). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, U., Orasanu, J., & Montalvo, M. (1993). Efficient decision strategies on the flight deck. In R. S. Jensen and D. Neumeister (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 238–243.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klein, G.A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research, 5 (pp. 47–92), Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lesgold, A. (1994). Ideas about feedback and their implications for intelligent coached apprenticeship. Machine Mediated Learning, 4(1), 67–80.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Randle, R.J., Larsen, W.E., & Williams, D.H. (1980). Some human factors issues in the development and evaluation of cockpit alerting and warning systems. NASA Reference Publication 1055. Moffett Field, CA: NASA Ames Research Center.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rouse, W.B., & Morris, N.M. (1985). On looking into the black box: Prospects and limits in the search for mental models (DTIC AD-A159080). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology, Center for Human-Machine Systems Research.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schneider, W. (1985). Training high-performance skills: Fallacies and guidelines. Human Factors, 27(3), 285–300.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shrestha, L.B., Prince, C., Baker, D.P. & Salas, E. (1995). Understanding situation awareness: Concepts, methods, and training. In W. B. Rouse (Ed.), Human/Technology Interaction in Complex Systems, 7 (pp. 45–83). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stout, R.J., Salas, E., & Kraiger, K. (1997). The role of trainee knowledge structures in aviation team environments. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7(3), 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stout, R.J., Cannon-Bowers, J.A. & Salas, E. (In preparation). Team situational awareness. Cue-recognition training. To appear in D. J. Garland and M. R. Endsley (Eds.), Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    USAF (1995). Flying Operations, Aircrew Standardization/Evaluation Program: Air Force Instruction 11-408/ACC Sup 1, November 1, 1995.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    VanLehn, K. (1988). Student Modeling. In M. C. Polson and J. J. Richardson (Eds.), Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 55–78). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilson, B. & Cole, P. (1991). A review of cognitive teaching models. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Search TechnologyNorcross

Personalised recommendations