Advertisement

A Formative Evaluation of the PACT Algebra II Tutor: Support for Simple Hierarchical Reasoning

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1452)

Abstract

This paper reports a formative analysis of a principal interface tool in the PACT Algebra II Tutor (PAT2). PAT2 employs modern computational tools to support student reasoning about real-world problem situations. This paper examines a curriculum section on general linear form equations and evaluates the effectiveness of a worksheet tool in reifying the hierarchical structure of the problem situations. Performance analyses suggest that the worksheet effectively supports students in mapping from natural language situations to hierarchical symbolic structures, and that this accounts for the preponderance of observed learning gains. Analyses also suggest that students incur a performance cost in using the worksheet and that the worksheet might be deployed more efficiently in problem solving.

Keywords

Problem Situation Solution Path Hierarchical Representation Cognitive Tutor Posttest Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R.: Rules of the mind. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson, J.R., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger K.R., Pelletier, R.: Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. Journal of the Learning Sciences, (1995), 4, 167–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Corbett, A.T., Anderson, J.R.,: Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction, (1995), 4, 253–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Corbett, A.T., Bhatnagar, A.: Student modeling in the ACT Programming Tutor: Adjusting a procedural learning model with declarative knowledge Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on User Modeling. Springer-Verlag Wein, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R.: Intelligent tutoring systems. In M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer and P. Prabhu (Eds.) Handbook of human computer interaction, 2nd edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koedinger, K.R., Anderson, J.R., Hadley, W.H., Mark, M.A.: Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Artificial Intelligence and Education, 1995: The Proceedings of AI-ED 95. AACE, Charlottesville, VA (1995)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. The Council, Reston, VA (1989)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Computer Interaction InstituteCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations