Skip to main content

Combatting Shallow Learning in a Tutor for Geometry Problem Solving

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1452))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The PACT Geometry tutor has been designed, with guidance from mathematics educators, to be an integrated part of a complete, new-standards-oriented course for highschool geometry. We conducted a formative evaluation of the third “geometric properties” lesson and saw significant student learning gains. We also found that students were better able to provide numerical answers to problems than to articulate the reasons that are presumably involved in finding these answers. This suggests that students may provide answers using superficial (and possibly unreliable) visual associations rather than reason logically from definitions and conjectures. To combat this type of shallow learning, we are developing a new version of the tutor’s third lesson, aimed at getting students to reason more deliberately with definitions and theorems as they work on geometry problems. In the new version, students are required to state a reason for their answers, which they can select from a Glossary of geometry definitions and theorems. We will conduct an experiment to test whether providing tutoring on reasoning will transfer to better performance on answer giving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J. R., 1993. Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., A. T. Corbett, K. R. Koedinger, and R. Pelletier, 1995. Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4,167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R., and R. Pelletier, 1991. A development system for model-tracing tutors. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1–8. Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, R. R., and J. S. Brown, 1982. An Investigation of Computer Coaching for Informal Learning Activities. In D. H. Sleeman and J. S. Brown (eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 79–98. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T. H., P. J. Feltovich, and R. Glaser, 1981. Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. T., and J. R. Anderson, 1995. Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4: 253–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H., K. J. Holyoak, R. E. Nisbett, and P. R. Thagard, 1986. Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., and J. R. Anderson, 1990. Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science, 14, 511–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koedinger, K. R., and J. R. Anderson, 1993. Reifying implicit planning in geometry. In S. Lajoie and S. Derry (eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools, 15–45. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. S., J. F. Lehman, and K. R. Koedinger, 1997. Goals and learning in microworlds. Submitted to Cognitive Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM, 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A., 1971. Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S., and K. R. Koedinger, 1997. An architecture for plug-in tutoring agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 7(3/4), 315–347. Charlottesville, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, S., and J. R. Anderson, 1995. Calculation and strategy in the equation solving tutor. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 413–418. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R., Colleen Sinclair, H., Snyder, J. (1998). Combatting Shallow Learning in a Tutor for Geometry Problem Solving. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64770-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68716-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics