Skip to main content

Cognitive Task Analysis in Service of Intelligent Tutoring System Design: A Case Study in Statistics

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1452))

Abstract

Cognitive task analysis involves identifying the components of a task that are required for adequate performance. It is thus an important step in ITS design because it circumscribes the curriculum to be taught and provides a decomposition of that curriculum into the knowledge and subskills students must learn. This paper describes several different kinds of cognitive task analysis and organizes them according to a taxonomy of theoretical/empirical ∞ prescriptive/descriptive approaches. Examples are drawn from the analysis of a particular statistical reasoning task. The discussion centers on how different approaches to task analysis provide different perspectives on the decomposition of a complex skill and compares these approaches to more traditional methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: Lessons learned. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(2), 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, B. J. (1996). A look at the literature (and other resources) on teaching statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne, M., & Bovair, S. (1997). A working memory model of a common procedural error. Cognitive Science, 21, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, S., Smith, G., Chechile, R. A., Burns, G. & Tsai, F. (1996). Identifying impediments to learning probability and statistics from an assessment of instructional software. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Durkin, J. (1994). Knowledge acquisition. In J. Durkin (Ed.) Expert systems: Design and development. (pp. 518–599). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ericcson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol Analysis (Rev.). Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garfield, J. & delMas, R. (1991). Students’ conceptions of probability. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Teaching Statistics, D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Volume 1. pp. 340–349. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1993). Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines for model-based intelligent tutoring system design. In Lajoie, S., & Derry, S. (Eds.) Computers as Cognitive Tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lang, J., Coyne, G., & Wackerly, D. (1993). ExplorStat. Computer Program.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loomis, J., & Boynton, G. (1992). Stat Visuals. Univ. of Calif. Computer program.

    Google Scholar 

  11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pittenger, D. J. (1995). Teaching students about graphs. Teach. of Psych. 22(2), 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shute, V. J., & Gluck, K. A. (1994). Stat Lady Descriptive Statistics Tutor: Data Organization and Plotting Module. Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shute, V. J. (1995). SMART: Student Modeling Approach for Responsive Tutoring. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shute, V.J., Gawlick-Grendell, L. A., Young, R.K., and Burnham, C.A. (1995). An Experiential System for Learning Probability: Stat Lady Description and Evaluation. Instructional Science (4), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ware, M. E., & Chastain, J. D. (1991). Developing selection skills in introductory statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 18(4), 219–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lovett, M.C. (1998). Cognitive Task Analysis in Service of Intelligent Tutoring System Design: A Case Study in Statistics. In: Goettl, B.P., Halff, H.M., Redfield, C.L., Shute, V.J. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-68716-5_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64770-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68716-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics