Skip to main content

A theory of game trees, based on solution trees

  • Contributed Papers
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
SOFSEM'97: Theory and Practice of Informatics (SOFSEM 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1338))

  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, a theory of game tree algorithms is presented, entirely based upon the concept of solution tree. During execution of a game tree algorithm, one may distinguish between so-called alive and dead nodes. It will turn out, that only alive nodes have to be considered, whereas dead nodes should be neglected. The algorithm may stop, when every node is dead. Further, it is proved that every algorithm needs to build a critical tree. Finally, we show, that some common game tree algorithms agree with this theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Victor Allis, Maarten van der Meulen, and H. Jaap van den Herik, Proofnumber search, Artificial Intelligence 66 (1994), pp. 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. de Bruin, W. Pijls, Trends in Game Tree Search, Proceedings Sofsem '96, Theory and Practice of Informatics (Keith G. Jeffery et al. eds.), LNCS vol. 1175, 1996, pp. 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toshihide Ibaraki, Generalization of alpha-beta and SSS* search procedures, Artificial Intelligence 29 (1986), pp. 73–117.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Toshihide Ibaraki, Search Algorithms for Minimax Game Trees, Conference paper Twenty years NP-completeness, Sicily, June 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. Kumar and L.N. Kanal, A General Branch and Bound Formulation for Understanding and Synthesizing And/Or Tree Search Procedures, Artificial Intelligence 21 (1983), pp. 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donald E. Knuth and Ronald W. Moore, An analysis of alpha-beta pruning, Artificial Intelligence 6 (1975), no. 4, pp. 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wim Pijls, Arie de Bruin, Aske Plaat, A theory of game trees, based on solution trees, Tech. Report EUR-CS-96-06, Erasmus University Rotterdam, December 1996, also available as: http://www. cs. few. eur.nl/few/inf/publicaties/rapporten.eur-few-cs-96-06. ps

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aske Plaat, Jonathan Schaeffer, Wim Pijls and Arie de Bruin, Best-first fixed depth game tree search in practice, Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), vol. 1, pp. 273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aske Plaat, Jonathan Schaeffer, Wim Pijls and Arie de Bruin, A Minimax Algorithm Better than SSS*, Artificial Intelligence 84 (1996) pp. 299–337.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Stockman, A minimax algorithm better than alpha-beta?, Artificial Intelligence 12 (1979), no. 2, pp. 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

František Plášil Keith G. Jeffery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pijls, W., de Bruin, A. (1997). A theory of game trees, based on solution trees. In: Plášil, F., Jeffery, K.G. (eds) SOFSEM'97: Theory and Practice of Informatics. SOFSEM 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63774-5_136

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63774-5_136

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63774-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69645-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics