Abstract
Spatial information is typically represented in memory in a form that facilitates operations like spatial reasoning, mental navigation, search, and perspective shifts. This apparently happens whether learning is through primary experience or description, and it appears to happen whether the learned configuration is large- or small-scale. Typical methods used in the cognitive map and mental models literatures diverge, however, in several ways that might affect representation (e.g., medium of input at learning, size of the referent situation, and delay from learning to test). The cognitive map literature shows that spatial representation of large-scale environments persists, though often biased toward spatial simplification over time. This represents one optimal solution to the problem of retaining information in a form that facilitates likely cognitive operations while minimizing resources devoted to storing the information. The current studies investigate whether mental models learned from description are subject to the same tendencies or whether they revert with time to a less spatial format that better optimizes cognitive economy. Secondly, these studies investigate the extent to which visual input at learning affects how the information is represented.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition by components. Psychological Review, 94, 115–147.
Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scenes. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98.
Ehrlich, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1982). Spatial descriptions and referential continuity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 21, 296–306.
Franklin, N., & Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 119, 63–76.
Franklin, N., Tversky, B., & Coon, V. (1992). Switching points of view in spatial mental models. Memory & Cognition, 20, 507–518.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kruley, P. (1992). Pictures and anaphora: Evidence for independent processes. Memory & Cognition, 20, 461–471.
Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151.
Glenberg, A., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
Hitch, G. J., Brandimonte, M.A., & Walker, P. (1995). Two types of representation in visual memory: Evidence from the effects of stimulus contrast on image combination. Memory & Cognition, 23, 147–154.
Hochberg, J. (1968). In the mind's eye. In R. N. Haber (Ed.), Contemporary theory and research in visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. pp. 309–331.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S.M. (1973). Scanning visual images: Some structural implications. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 90–94.
Kosslyn, S.M., Ball, T., & Reiser, B. (1978). Visual images preserve metric spatial information: Evidence from studies of image scanning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4 47–60.
Landau, B., & Jackendoff, R. (1993). “What” and “Where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 217–265.
Levine, M., Jankovic, I., & Palij, M. (1982). Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 157–175.
Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. pp. 65–89.
Maki, R., Grandy, & Hauge. (1979). Why is telling right from left more difficult than telling above from below? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 52.
Mani, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1982). The mental representation of spatial descriptions. Memory and Cognition, 10, 181–187.
Moar, I., & Bower, G. H. (1983). Cognitive maps as impossible figures: The internal inconsistency of spatial knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 11, 107–113.
Morrow, D. G., & Clark, H. H. (1988). Interpreting words in spatial descriptions. Language & Cognitive Processes, 3, 275–292.
Morrow, D. G., Greenspan, S. L., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Accessibility and situation models in narrative comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 165–187.
Nelson, D. L., Reed, V. S., & McEvoy, C. L. (1977). Learning to order pictures and words: A model of sensory and semantic encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 485–497.
Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1984). Representation of spatial descriptions in working memory. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, Spring, 52-62.
Payne, S. J. (1993). Memory for mental models of spatial descriptions: An episodic-construction-trace hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 6, 591–603.
Posner, M. I., Nissen, M. J., & Klein, R. M. (1976). Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance. Psyhchological Review, 83, 157–171.
Radvansky, G. A., & Zacks, R. T. (1991). Mental models and the fan effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 17, 940–953.
Santa, J. (1977). Spatial transformation of words and pictures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning Memory 3 418–427.
Schmalhofer, F., & Glavanov, D. (1986). Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional, and situational representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 279–294.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Behavior, 6, 156–163.
Stevens, A., & Coupe, P. (1976). Distortions in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437.
Taylor, H. A., & Tversky, B. (1992). Spatial mental models derived from survey and route descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 261–292.
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.
Van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. NY: Academic Press.
Waddill, P. J., & McDaniel, M. A. (1992). Pictorial enhancement of text memory: Limitations imposed by picture type and comprehension skill. Memory & Cognition, 20, 472–482.
Wender, K.F., Wagener, M., & Wagner, V. (1990). Poster presented at the 31st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, New Orleans, 1990.
Zwaan, R. A., & van Oostendorp, H. (1993). Do readers construct spatial representations in naturalistic story comprehension? Discourse Processes, 16, 125–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Federico, T., Franklin, N. (1997). Long-term spatial representations from pictorial and textual input. In: Hirtle, S.C., Frank, A.U. (eds) Spatial Information Theory A Theoretical Basis for GIS. COSIT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1329. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_55
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63623-4_55
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63623-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69616-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive