Advertisement

Highly scalable on-line payments via task decoupling

  • David W. Kravitz
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1318)

Abstract

Several digital payment systems have been described which attempt to simulate or extend already existing payment mechanisms so as to make them suitable for electronic commerce. Such mechanisms or instruments include cash or coins (e.g., DigiCash, NetCash), checks (e.g., NetCheque), and credit cards (e.g., CyberCash). The anonymity, off-line, and peer-to-peer aspects of some of these systems can introduce security weaknesses and major scalability problems. One approach to security, as taken by the Millicent architecture, is to only allow very low cost transactions. True security, unlike the approach taken by First Virtual, requires clear delineation of the customer and merchant roles. The goal of this paper is to outline an approach which is inexpensive enough to allow for very low value transactions but secure enough to allow for intermediate value transactions, while providing true customer anonymity with respect to merchants and electronic handling of refund requests. Unlike NetBill and the GC Tech GlobelD system, under the default operation of the system the customer in no way authenticates or identifies itself to the merchant, pseudonymously or otherwise. This is an example of the decoupling of tasks used as a basic design principle: Each system component deals directly with only those aspects in its narrowly defined scope of responsibilities, and within this asynchronous system time-consuming or time-varying issues not directly related to the payment flow, such as actual delivery of digital goods, are handled outside of the basic payment flow. After presenting a high-level comparison of our approach to those of two other instant debit systems, GlobelD and NetBill, we give a more detailed explanation of the design criteria and characteristics exhibited by this new approach to on-line payments.

Keywords

Hard Good Digital Good Original Transaction Payment Request Voice Response Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    CyberCash, URL: http://www.cybercash.com/Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    DigiCash, URL: http://www.digicash.com/Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    First Virtual, URL: http://www.fv.com/Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    GC Tech GlobelD, URL: http://www.gctec.com/us/Technical/: FAQ about the GlobeID Technology; URL: http://www5conf.inria.fr/fich_html/papers/: Paul-Andre Pays, Fabrice de Comarmond, “An Intermediation and Payment System Technology,” Fifth International World Wide Web Conference, May 6–10, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Millicent, URL: http://www.research.digital.com/SRC/millicent/Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    NetBill, Cox, B., Tygar, J.D., Sirbu, M., “NetBill Security and Transaction Protocol,” First USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, July 11–12, 1995; URL: http://www.ini.cmu.edu/netbill/: Sirbu, M., Tygar, J.D., “NetBill: An Internet Commerce System Optimized for Network Delivered Services.”Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    NetCash, Medvinsky G. and Neuman, B.C., NetCash: A Design for Practical Electronic Currency on the Internet, Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, November 1993.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    NetCheque, Medvinsky, G. and Neuman, B.C., Requirements for Network Payment: The NetChequeTM Perspective, Proceedings of IEEE Compcon '95, San Francisco, March 1995.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    SPECTRUM, IEEE, February 1997.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Kravitz
    • 1
  1. 1.CertCo, LLCAlbuquerque

Personalised recommendations