Advertisement

On the continuum between on-line and off-line E-cash systems — I

  • Yacov Yacobi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 1318)

Abstract

Electronic cash systems for small transactions are discussed, with the functionality goal of minimizing involvement of third parties in transactions between users. To this end the potential role of randomized audit mechanisms is discussed. A continuum exists between the extremes of totally on-line and totally off-line payment systems, and there exist business motivations to establishing an intermediate “working point.”

Our security goal is to protect the systems against economically motivated adversaries. Let the adversarial expenses (to interfere with normal operation of wallets) be Cb, and 1/d be the audit sampling rate, and for simplicity assume that each payment has a value of one unit. Then when the adversarial payer breaks even with her investment, Cb, the probability not to detect her is O(exp(-Cb/d)).

A curious observation on the so called “after the fact double-spender exposure” mechanisms unexpectedly falls from the analysis of randomized audit mechanisms.

Keywords

Banking System Payment System Fraud Detection Burst Attack Electronic Payment System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Chaum Fiat and Naor: Untraceable Electronic Cash, Proc. Crypto 1988.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Even, O. Goldreich, Y. Yacobi: Electronic Wallet, Proc. Crypto'83 (See also the Zurich'94 Seminar.)Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Feller: An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, Wiley, Vol. I, 3rd AdditionGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.D. Gitlin, J.F. Hayes, and S.B. Weinstein: “Data Communications Principles,” Plenum Press 1992, ISBN 0-306-43777-5.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    E. Gabber and A. Silberschatz: “Agora: A Minimal Distributed Protocol for Electronic Commerce,” USENIX Workshop on E-Commerce, Oakland CA, Nov. 1996.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    S. Jarecki and A. M. Odlyzko: “An efficient micropayment system based on probabilistic polling,” Proc. Financial Cryptography-97.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Okamoto: An Efficient Divisible Electronic Cash Scheme, Proc. Crypto'95, Springer Verlag LNCS 963, pp. 438–451.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Y. Yacobi: Efficient E-money, in Proc. Asiacrypt'94, Springer Verlag LNCS 917 pp. 153–163.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yacov Yacobi
    • 1
  1. 1.MicrosoftRedmond

Personalised recommendations