Skip to main content

Effects of Kolmogorov complexity present in inductive inference as well

  • Session 7
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 1997)

Abstract

For all complexity measures in Kolmogorov complexity the effect discovered by P. Martin-Löf holds. For every infinite binary sequence there is a wide gap between the supremum and the infimum of the complexity of initial fragments of the sequence. It is assumed that that this inevitable gap is characteristic of Kolmogorov complexity, and it is caused by the highly abstract nature of the unrestricted Kolmogorov complexity.

We consider the complexity of inductive inference for recursively enumerable classes of total recursive functions. This object is considered as a rather simple object where no effects from highly abstract theories are likely to be met. Here, similar gaps were discovered. Moreover, the existence of these gaps is proved by an explicit use of the theorem by P. Martin-Löf.

In our paper, we study a modification of inductive inference complexity. The complexity is usually understood as the maximum of mindchanges over the functions defined by the first n indices of the numbering. Instead we consider the mindchange complexity as the maximum over the first n functions in the numbering (disregarding the repeated functions. Linear upper and lower bounds for the mindchange complexity are proved. However, the gap between bounds for all n and bounds for infinitely many n, remains.

Supported by Latvia Science Council Grant 96.0282

Supported by NSF Grant 9301339.

Supported by Auckland University Research Grants A18/XXXXX/62090/3414012, A18/XXXXX/62090/F3414022

Supported by the Internatonal Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, California, by the DFG grant KA 673/4-1, and by the ESPRIT BR Grants 7079 and ECUS030

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Ambainis and J.Smotrovs, Enumerable classes of total recursive functions: complexity of inductive inference. Proceedings of the AII'94, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 872 (1994), pp. 10–25

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bārzdiņš. On the frequency solution of the membership problem for recursively enumerable sets. Trudi of V.A.Steklov Mathematics Institute, Moscow, 1973, pp. 133–160

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. Blum and M.Blum, Towards a mathematical theory of inductive inference, Information and Control, 28 (1975), pp.122–155

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Bārziņš and R. Freivalds. On the prediction of general recursive functions. Soviet Math. Doklady, 13 (1972), pp.1224–1228.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Case, C. Smith, Comparison of identification criteria for machine inductive inference. Theoretical Computer Science, 25 (1983), pp.193–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Freivalds, J. Bārzdiņš, K. Podnieks. Inductive inference of recursive functions: complexity bounds. Baltic Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 502 (1991), pp.111–155.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Freivalds and A.C. Hoffman. An inductive inference approach to classification. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Inteligence, 6 (1994), pp.63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Freivalds, C. H. Smith, The role of procrastination in machine learning. Information and Computation, vol. 107 (1993), pp. 237–271

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.M.Gold, Limiting recursion. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 30 (1965), pp.28–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.M.Gold, Language identification in the limit. Information and Control, 10 (1967), pp.447–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Efim Kinber and Frank Stephan. Language learning from texts: mind changes, limited memory and monotonicity. Proc. 8th Annu. Conf. on Comput. Learning Theory,ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 182–189, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.N. Kolmogorov, Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information. Problems of Information Transmission, vol. 1, No. 1, 1965, pp.1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Lange, T. Zeugmann, Trading monotonicity demands versus mind changes. Proceedings of EuroCOLT'95, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 904 (1995), pp. 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Li, P. Vitanyi, Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer-Verlag, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Martin-Löf. On the definition of random sequence. Information and Control, 9 (1966), pp.602–619

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Rogers, Jr. Gödel numberings of partial recursive functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 23:331–341, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Rogers, Jr. Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw-Hill, 1967. Reprinted, MIT Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Soare, Recursively Enumerable Sets and Degrees. Springer-Verlag, 1987 *** DIRECT SUPPORT *** A0008157 00005

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ming Li Akira Maruoka

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ambainis, A. et al. (1997). Effects of Kolmogorov complexity present in inductive inference as well. In: Li, M., Maruoka, A. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1316. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63577-7_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63577-7_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63577-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69602-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics